Safety Comparison of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Using FAERS Spontaneous-Reporting Data: Drug-Specific Reporting Signals and Time-to-Onset Dynamics.

IF 1.9
Yidan Du, Jia Li, Fei Han, Jianjun Li, Hong Lin, Fangfang Ge
{"title":"Safety Comparison of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Using FAERS Spontaneous-Reporting Data: Drug-Specific Reporting Signals and Time-to-Onset Dynamics.","authors":"Yidan Du, Jia Li, Fei Han, Jianjun Li, Hong Lin, Fangfang Ge","doi":"10.2174/0115672050497124260720115932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors (AChEIs) are widely used for symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease, but their post-marketing reporting profiles may differ. This study compared FAERS disproportional reporting signals and Time-To-Onset (TTO) patterns for donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS reports from Q1 2004 to Q2 2025 were analyzed. Reports listing donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine as the primary suspect drug were retained. Unique case-drug-Preferred Term (PT) triplets were constructed after case-level and drug-event-level de-duplication. Positive signals were defined conservatively by the intersection of ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS/EBGM criteria. TTO was evaluated using cumulative onset-distribution curves, Weibull models, and Accelerated Failure-Time (AFT) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 9,474 donepezil reports, 3,042 galantamine reports, and 14,666 rivastigmine reports. The four-method intersection identified 286 positive PT reporting signals for donepezil, 143 for galantamine, and 259 for rivastigmine. Donepezil showed prominent cardiac reporting signals, including sinus bradycardia (ROR = 49.0) and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (ROR = 16.75). Rivastigmine showed application-site signals, including application-site erythema (ROR = 21.36) and application-site pruritus (ROR = 18.07). Galantamine showed signals including bradycardia (ROR = 15.37), fall (ROR = 3.44), and decreased appetite (ROR = 3.57). Median TTOs were 38, 44, and 64 days for donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine, respectively. Rivastigmine showed a later reported onset than donepezil in the AFT model (TR = 1.08; p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest shared cholinergic reporting patterns and drug-specific signal profiles. Because FAERS lacks exposure denominators, these results indicate disproportional reporting rather than incidence, causality, or comparative clinical risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine showed distinct FAERS reporting profiles and early post-initiation TTO patterns. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in independent pharmacovigilance or clinical datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050497124260720115932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objective: Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors (AChEIs) are widely used for symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease, but their post-marketing reporting profiles may differ. This study compared FAERS disproportional reporting signals and Time-To-Onset (TTO) patterns for donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine.

Methods: FAERS reports from Q1 2004 to Q2 2025 were analyzed. Reports listing donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine as the primary suspect drug were retained. Unique case-drug-Preferred Term (PT) triplets were constructed after case-level and drug-event-level de-duplication. Positive signals were defined conservatively by the intersection of ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS/EBGM criteria. TTO was evaluated using cumulative onset-distribution curves, Weibull models, and Accelerated Failure-Time (AFT) models.

Results: The analysis included 9,474 donepezil reports, 3,042 galantamine reports, and 14,666 rivastigmine reports. The four-method intersection identified 286 positive PT reporting signals for donepezil, 143 for galantamine, and 259 for rivastigmine. Donepezil showed prominent cardiac reporting signals, including sinus bradycardia (ROR = 49.0) and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (ROR = 16.75). Rivastigmine showed application-site signals, including application-site erythema (ROR = 21.36) and application-site pruritus (ROR = 18.07). Galantamine showed signals including bradycardia (ROR = 15.37), fall (ROR = 3.44), and decreased appetite (ROR = 3.57). Median TTOs were 38, 44, and 64 days for donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine, respectively. Rivastigmine showed a later reported onset than donepezil in the AFT model (TR = 1.08; p = 0.008).

Discussion: The findings suggest shared cholinergic reporting patterns and drug-specific signal profiles. Because FAERS lacks exposure denominators, these results indicate disproportional reporting rather than incidence, causality, or comparative clinical risk.

Conclusion: Donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine showed distinct FAERS reporting profiles and early post-initiation TTO patterns. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in independent pharmacovigilance or clinical datasets.

使用FAERS自发报告数据的乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂的安全性比较:药物特异性报告信号和发病时间动态。
简介/目的:乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂(AChEIs)广泛用于阿尔茨海默病的对症治疗,但其上市后报告概况可能不同。本研究比较了多奈哌齐、加兰他明和利瓦斯汀的FAERS不成比例报告信号和发病时间(TTO)模式。方法:对2004年第一季度至2025年第二季度的FAERS报告进行分析。将多奈哌齐、加兰他明或利瓦斯替明列为主要可疑药物的报告被保留。在病例级和药物-事件级去重复之后,构建了独特的病例-药物首选术语(PT)三元组。阳性信号由ROR、PRR、BCPNN和MGPS/EBGM标准的交叉保守定义。使用累积发病分布曲线、威布尔模型和加速失效时间(AFT)模型评估TTO。结果:共纳入多奈哌齐9474篇,加兰他明3042篇,雷瓦斯汀14666篇。四种方法交叉鉴定了多奈哌齐286例阳性PT报告信号,加兰他明143例,雷瓦斯汀259例。多奈哌齐表现出明显的心脏报告信号,包括窦性心动过缓(ROR = 49.0)和心电图QT间期延长(ROR = 16.75)。利瓦斯替明显示应用部位信号,包括应用部位红斑(ROR = 21.36)和应用部位瘙痒(ROR = 18.07)。加兰他明显示的信号包括心动过缓(ROR = 15.37)、跌倒(ROR = 3.44)和食欲下降(ROR = 3.57)。多奈哌齐、加兰他明和雷瓦斯汀的中位总生存时间分别为38、44和64天。在AFT模型中,利瓦斯汀比多奈哌齐报告的起效时间晚(TR = 1.08; p = 0.008)。讨论:研究结果提示共享的胆碱能报告模式和药物特异性信号谱。由于FAERS缺乏暴露因子,这些结果表明报告比例失调,而不是发病率、因果关系或比较临床风险。结论:多奈哌齐、加兰他明和利瓦斯汀具有不同的FAERS报告特征和早期开始后TTO模式。这些发现是假设产生的,需要在独立的药物警戒或临床数据集中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书