Subclinical Atherosclerosis Markers in Alzheimer's and Vascular Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with Healthy Controls.

IF 1.9
Aylin Güneşli, Fazirah Hussein
{"title":"Subclinical Atherosclerosis Markers in Alzheimer's and Vascular Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with Healthy Controls.","authors":"Aylin Güneşli, Fazirah Hussein","doi":"10.2174/0115672050495193260728050343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vascular mechanisms are increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. This study aimed to evaluate the association between subclinical atherosclerosis markers and cognitive performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia compared with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 79 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 69 patients with vascular dementia, and 69 age- and sex-matched controls. Vascular markers were measured, and cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Correlation, multivariable regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dementia groups had greater epicardial fat thickness (Alzheimer's disease: 6.49 ± 0.93 mm; vascular dementia: 6.36 ± 1.04 mm) than controls (5.77 ± 0.87 mm, p < 0.001). Carotid intima- media thickness was higher (0.53 ± 0.08 mm and 0.55 ± 0.10 mm versus 0.48 ± 0.08 mm, p < 0.001). Carotid distensibility and strain were lower in dementia (0.21 ± 0.03 and 10.26 ± 1.58; 0.21 ± 0.03 and 9.93±1.77) than in controls (0.25 ± 0.05 and 11.3 ± 1.75, p < 0.05). Mini-Mental State Examination scores correlated negatively with epicardial fat thickness (r = -0.30) and carotid intima- media thickness (r = -0.27), and positively with distensibility (r = 0.40) and strain (r = 0.31). Epicardial fat thickness (area under the curve 0.716) and carotid intima-media thickness (0.678) showed moderate ability to distinguish dementia from controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support a significant association between vascular structural and functional alterations and cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subclinical atherosclerosis markers were significantly associated with cognitive impairment; however, causal relationships cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design. These markers may support early identification and risk stratification of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050495193260728050343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular mechanisms are increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. This study aimed to evaluate the association between subclinical atherosclerosis markers and cognitive performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia compared with healthy controls.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 79 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 69 patients with vascular dementia, and 69 age- and sex-matched controls. Vascular markers were measured, and cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Correlation, multivariable regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

Results: The dementia groups had greater epicardial fat thickness (Alzheimer's disease: 6.49 ± 0.93 mm; vascular dementia: 6.36 ± 1.04 mm) than controls (5.77 ± 0.87 mm, p < 0.001). Carotid intima- media thickness was higher (0.53 ± 0.08 mm and 0.55 ± 0.10 mm versus 0.48 ± 0.08 mm, p < 0.001). Carotid distensibility and strain were lower in dementia (0.21 ± 0.03 and 10.26 ± 1.58; 0.21 ± 0.03 and 9.93±1.77) than in controls (0.25 ± 0.05 and 11.3 ± 1.75, p < 0.05). Mini-Mental State Examination scores correlated negatively with epicardial fat thickness (r = -0.30) and carotid intima- media thickness (r = -0.27), and positively with distensibility (r = 0.40) and strain (r = 0.31). Epicardial fat thickness (area under the curve 0.716) and carotid intima-media thickness (0.678) showed moderate ability to distinguish dementia from controls.

Discussion: These findings support a significant association between vascular structural and functional alterations and cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: Subclinical atherosclerosis markers were significantly associated with cognitive impairment; however, causal relationships cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design. These markers may support early identification and risk stratification of dementia.

阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆的亚临床动脉粥样硬化标志物:与健康对照的横断面比较
血管机制越来越多地涉及阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆的病理生理。本研究旨在评估与健康对照相比,阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆患者的亚临床动脉粥样硬化标志物与认知表现之间的关系。方法:这项横断面研究包括79例阿尔茨海默病患者、69例血管性痴呆患者和69例年龄和性别匹配的对照组。测量血管标志物,并使用简易精神状态检查评估认知功能。进行了相关分析、多变量回归分析和受试者工作特征分析。结果:痴呆组心外膜脂肪厚度(阿尔茨海默病:6.49±0.93 mm;血管性痴呆:6.36±1.04 mm)高于对照组(5.77±0.87 mm, p < 0.001)。颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度较高(0.53±0.08 mm和0.55±0.10 mm vs 0.48±0.08 mm, p < 0.001)。痴呆组颈动脉舒张度和张力分别为0.21±0.03和10.26±1.58,0.21±0.03和9.93±1.77,低于对照组(0.25±0.05和11.3±1.75,p < 0.05)。迷你精神状态检查评分与心外膜脂肪厚度(r = -0.30)、颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(r = -0.27)呈负相关,与扩张性(r = 0.40)、张力(r = 0.31)呈正相关。心外膜脂肪厚度(曲线下面积0.716)和颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(0.678)与对照组区分痴呆的能力中等。讨论:这些发现支持血管结构和功能改变与认知障碍之间的重要联系。结论:亚临床动脉粥样硬化标志物与认知功能障碍有显著相关性;然而,由于横断面设计,因果关系无法推断。这些标记可能支持痴呆的早期识别和风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书