Overcoming the opaque side of AI in healthcare: a lifecycle-based approach.

IF 2.7
Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-27 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2026.2723944
Elisabetta Bianchini, Lucia Billeci, Noemi Conditi, Florinda Coro, Alice Ravizza
{"title":"Overcoming the opaque side of AI in healthcare: a lifecycle-based approach.","authors":"Elisabetta Bianchini, Lucia Billeci, Noemi Conditi, Florinda Coro, Alice Ravizza","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2723944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transparency has emerged as a foundational condition for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Despite its centrality, practical approaches to systematically operationalize transparency across the entire lifecycle of AI-enabled medical devices remain fragmented and insufficiently structured. This work addresses this gap by proposing a lifecycle-oriented operational approach to guide the consistent implementation and evaluation of transparency in AI-based medical technologies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A narrative synthesis of regulatory texts, international standards, and scientific literature related to software as a medical device (SaMD), the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), data-protection rules, and relevant ISO/IEC guidance. Using a SaMD lifecycle framework, we mapped transparency requirements to practical development, validation, and governance activities across ideation, data and design inputs, risk management, implementation/verification, technical and clinical validation, market placement, maintenance, and disposal.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Transparency must be engineered as a lifecycle property, not an afterthought. We propose nine operational measures - covering documented design assumptions and datasets, transparency-oriented risk and change control, traceability, subgroup and independent validation, usability-based explainability, calibrated clinical evaluation, structured labeling, version-controlled updates, and regulated end-of-life data handling - to support regulatory readiness, calibrated clinical trust, and safe real-world integration of AI in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1171-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2723944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transparency has emerged as a foundational condition for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Despite its centrality, practical approaches to systematically operationalize transparency across the entire lifecycle of AI-enabled medical devices remain fragmented and insufficiently structured. This work addresses this gap by proposing a lifecycle-oriented operational approach to guide the consistent implementation and evaluation of transparency in AI-based medical technologies.

Areas covered: A narrative synthesis of regulatory texts, international standards, and scientific literature related to software as a medical device (SaMD), the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), data-protection rules, and relevant ISO/IEC guidance. Using a SaMD lifecycle framework, we mapped transparency requirements to practical development, validation, and governance activities across ideation, data and design inputs, risk management, implementation/verification, technical and clinical validation, market placement, maintenance, and disposal.

Expert opinion: Transparency must be engineered as a lifecycle property, not an afterthought. We propose nine operational measures - covering documented design assumptions and datasets, transparency-oriented risk and change control, traceability, subgroup and independent validation, usability-based explainability, calibrated clinical evaluation, structured labeling, version-controlled updates, and regulated end-of-life data handling - to support regulatory readiness, calibrated clinical trust, and safe real-world integration of AI in healthcare.

克服医疗保健领域人工智能不透明的一面:基于生命周期的方法。
简介:透明度已经成为医疗保健领域值得信赖的人工智能(AI)的基础条件。尽管人工智能处于中心地位,但在支持人工智能的医疗设备的整个生命周期中系统地实现透明度的实际方法仍然是分散的,而且不够结构化。这项工作通过提出一种面向生命周期的操作方法来指导基于人工智能的医疗技术透明度的一致实施和评估,从而解决了这一差距。涵盖的领域:与软件作为医疗器械(SaMD)、欧盟医疗器械法规(MDR)、欧盟人工智能法案(AI法案)、数据保护规则和相关ISO/IEC指南相关的法规文本、国际标准和科学文献的叙述性综合。使用SaMD生命周期框架,我们将透明度需求映射到跨概念、数据和设计输入、风险管理、实现/验证、技术和临床验证、市场定位、维护和处置的实际开发、验证和治理活动。专家意见:透明度必须作为生命周期属性来设计,而不是事后的想法。我们提出了九项操作措施,包括文档化的设计假设和数据集、面向透明度的风险和变更控制、可追溯性、子组和独立验证、基于可用性的可解释性、校准的临床评估、结构化标签、版本控制的更新和规范的临终数据处理,以支持监管准备、校准的临床信任和人工智能在医疗保健中的安全实际集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书