Evaluation of China's "1146" school-based myopia control programme in primary school children: A 12-month study.

IF 2 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Liuying Wang, Mengke Tian, Weiquan Guo, Jialong Wang, Xiangxing Duan, Lina Yun
{"title":"Evaluation of China's \"1146\" school-based myopia control programme in primary school children: A 12-month study.","authors":"Liuying Wang, Mengke Tian, Weiquan Guo, Jialong Wang, Xiangxing Duan, Lina Yun","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2026147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Structured school-based myopia prevention programmes are increasingly promoted, but real-world evidence supporting multicomponent models remains limited. This study evaluated the 12-month effectiveness of the \"1146\" programme in China in a routine primary school setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective, non-randomised controlled study included 24 classes from a single primary school, assigned to intervention or control groups according to teaching schedule. After follow-up, 100 children from the intervention group and 98 children from the control group were analysed. Intervention classes received the multicomponent \"1146\" programme, which integrated education, visual behaviour, environmental measures, outdoor activity promotion, monitoring, and adjunctive professional components. Control classes followed standard teaching. Routine refractive correction was provided to myopic children in both groups when indicated. Continuous outcomes were analysed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline value, age, and sex, with class included as a random effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, axial length increased less in the intervention group than in controls (0.01 ± 0.11 mm versus [vs] 0.29 ± 0.37 mm; adjusted mean difference -0.288 mm; 95% confidence interval -0.363 to -0.213). Spherical equivalent changed by 0.20 ± 0.61 D vs -0.45 ± 0.77 D, and uncorrected visual acuity changed by 0.37 ± 0.30 vs -0.27 ± 0.25 (all adjusted P<0.001). Improvement of ≥2 lines in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) occurred in 53.0% vs 1.0%, indicating meaningful functional gain. No subgroup interaction was significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"1146\" programme was associated with less axial elongation and more favourable refractive and UCVA changes over 12 months. The single-school, non-randomised design limited causal inference and generalisability. Larger randomised multicentre studies with longer follow-up are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":" ","pages":"415-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2026147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Structured school-based myopia prevention programmes are increasingly promoted, but real-world evidence supporting multicomponent models remains limited. This study evaluated the 12-month effectiveness of the "1146" programme in China in a routine primary school setting.

Method: This prospective, non-randomised controlled study included 24 classes from a single primary school, assigned to intervention or control groups according to teaching schedule. After follow-up, 100 children from the intervention group and 98 children from the control group were analysed. Intervention classes received the multicomponent "1146" programme, which integrated education, visual behaviour, environmental measures, outdoor activity promotion, monitoring, and adjunctive professional components. Control classes followed standard teaching. Routine refractive correction was provided to myopic children in both groups when indicated. Continuous outcomes were analysed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline value, age, and sex, with class included as a random effect.

Results: At 12 months, axial length increased less in the intervention group than in controls (0.01 ± 0.11 mm versus [vs] 0.29 ± 0.37 mm; adjusted mean difference -0.288 mm; 95% confidence interval -0.363 to -0.213). Spherical equivalent changed by 0.20 ± 0.61 D vs -0.45 ± 0.77 D, and uncorrected visual acuity changed by 0.37 ± 0.30 vs -0.27 ± 0.25 (all adjusted P<0.001). Improvement of ≥2 lines in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) occurred in 53.0% vs 1.0%, indicating meaningful functional gain. No subgroup interaction was significant.

Conclusion: The "1146" programme was associated with less axial elongation and more favourable refractive and UCVA changes over 12 months. The single-school, non-randomised design limited causal inference and generalisability. Larger randomised multicentre studies with longer follow-up are needed.

中国“1146”校本小学生近视控制项目的评价:一项为期12个月的研究。
导论:以学校为基础的结构化近视预防规划日益得到推广,但支持多成分模型的现实证据仍然有限。本研究评估了“1146”项目在中国一所普通小学12个月的有效性。方法:本前瞻性、非随机对照研究包括来自一所小学的24个班级,根据教学计划分为干预组和对照组。随访后,对干预组100名儿童和对照组98名儿童进行分析。干预班接受了“1146”计划,该计划包括教育、视觉行为、环境措施、户外活动推广、监测和辅助专业内容。对照组遵循标准教学。两组患者均在需要时进行常规屈光矫正。使用线性混合效应模型分析连续结果,调整基线值、年龄和性别,并将类别纳入随机效应。结果:在12个月时,干预组的轴长增加幅度小于对照组(0.01±0.11 mm vs [vs] 0.29±0.37 mm;调整后平均差值为-0.288 mm; 95%可信区间为-0.363 ~ -0.213)。球面等效度变化为0.20±0.61 D vs -0.45±0.77 D,未矫正视力变化为0.37±0.30 vs -0.27±0.25(均调整后)。结论:在12个月内,“1146”方案与更少的轴向伸长率和更有利的屈光和UCVA变化相关。单学派、非随机设计限制了因果推理和普遍性。需要更大的随机多中心研究和更长的随访时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书