Temporal light modulation from LED lighting and seizure risk: A focused review of visible flicker, invisible modulation, and evidence gaps.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wieslaw Brodaczewski, Olivier Brodaczewski
{"title":"Temporal light modulation from LED lighting and seizure risk: A focused review of visible flicker, invisible modulation, and evidence gaps.","authors":"Wieslaw Brodaczewski, Olivier Brodaczewski","doi":"10.1002/epd2.70366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critically assess whether light emitting diode (LED) lighting temporal light modulation (TLM) is linked to seizure risk while distinguishing established evidence on visible flicker in photosensitive epilepsy from weaker evidence on prolonged exposure to invisible or supra-critical flicker fusion (CFF) modulation. The review also lists desired data: modulation depth at 100/120 Hz, waveform and driver parameters, neurological symptoms, and ethically possible seizure-incidence observations under measured lighting. The narrative focused review used a structured search of recent literature and targeted inclusion of foundational and immediately relevant findings. Intermittent photic stimulation and visible flicker, prolonged exposure to invisible or supra-CFF TLM, temporal light artifacts during eye movements, modulation depth and waveform, and practical study designs for neurological and seizure data were categorized. Visible flicker in photosensitive epilepsy, notably in the 3-65 Hz range, with maximal sensitivity at 15-25 Hz, is the strongest evidence. Susceptible people may have seizures after intense stroboscopic exposure, but this does not prove that LED illumination with high-frequency imperceptible modulation causes seizures. Even without seeing the flicker, continuous exposure to 100 Hz lights can cause headaches, eyestrain, and increased visual-cortex activity, according to foundational research. Phantom array effects reveal that supra-CFF modulation may cause visual discomfort during saccades. Direct evidence relating typical LED modulation depth to seizures is missing. Evidence suggests caution, not causality. Thus, the paper's goals are to define what is known and what should not be overinterpreted and to suggest ways to gather more data. Because seizures are rare and safety-critical, double-masked studies should initially prioritize more common and lower-risk outcomes like headache, eyestrain, visual discomfort, task performance, and cortical activation in relation to modulation depth, while seizure incidence should be examined through carefully monitored secondary endpoints or prospective surveillance under measured lighting conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.70366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critically assess whether light emitting diode (LED) lighting temporal light modulation (TLM) is linked to seizure risk while distinguishing established evidence on visible flicker in photosensitive epilepsy from weaker evidence on prolonged exposure to invisible or supra-critical flicker fusion (CFF) modulation. The review also lists desired data: modulation depth at 100/120 Hz, waveform and driver parameters, neurological symptoms, and ethically possible seizure-incidence observations under measured lighting. The narrative focused review used a structured search of recent literature and targeted inclusion of foundational and immediately relevant findings. Intermittent photic stimulation and visible flicker, prolonged exposure to invisible or supra-CFF TLM, temporal light artifacts during eye movements, modulation depth and waveform, and practical study designs for neurological and seizure data were categorized. Visible flicker in photosensitive epilepsy, notably in the 3-65 Hz range, with maximal sensitivity at 15-25 Hz, is the strongest evidence. Susceptible people may have seizures after intense stroboscopic exposure, but this does not prove that LED illumination with high-frequency imperceptible modulation causes seizures. Even without seeing the flicker, continuous exposure to 100 Hz lights can cause headaches, eyestrain, and increased visual-cortex activity, according to foundational research. Phantom array effects reveal that supra-CFF modulation may cause visual discomfort during saccades. Direct evidence relating typical LED modulation depth to seizures is missing. Evidence suggests caution, not causality. Thus, the paper's goals are to define what is known and what should not be overinterpreted and to suggest ways to gather more data. Because seizures are rare and safety-critical, double-masked studies should initially prioritize more common and lower-risk outcomes like headache, eyestrain, visual discomfort, task performance, and cortical activation in relation to modulation depth, while seizure incidence should be examined through carefully monitored secondary endpoints or prospective surveillance under measured lighting conditions.

来自LED照明的时间光调制和癫痫风险:对可见闪烁、不可见调制和证据差距的重点回顾。
严格评估发光二极管(LED)照明时间光调制(TLM)是否与癫痫发作风险有关,同时区分光敏性癫痫中可见闪烁的既定证据与长时间暴露于不可见或超临界闪烁融合(CFF)调制的较弱证据。该综述还列出了所需的数据:100/120 Hz的调制深度,波形和驱动器参数,神经症状,以及在测量照明下道德上可能的癫痫发生率观察。以叙述为重点的综述对近期文献进行了结构化搜索,并有针对性地纳入了基础和直接相关的发现。间歇光刺激和可见闪烁、长时间暴露于不可见或超cff TLM、眼动期间的时间光伪影、调制深度和波形,以及神经学和癫痫数据的实际研究设计进行了分类。光敏性癫痫的可见闪烁,特别是在3-65 Hz范围内,最大灵敏度为15-25 Hz,是最有力的证据。易受影响的人在强烈频闪照射后可能会癫痫发作,但这并不能证明具有难以察觉的高频调制的LED照明会导致癫痫发作。根据一项基础研究,即使没有看到闪烁,持续暴露在100赫兹的灯光下也会导致头痛、眼睛疲劳和视觉皮层活动增加。幻像阵列效应揭示了超cff调制可能导致扫视期间的视觉不适。有关典型LED调制深度与癫痫发作的直接证据缺失。证据表明需要谨慎,而不是因果关系。因此,本文的目标是定义什么是已知的,什么不应该被过度解释,并建议收集更多数据的方法。由于癫痫发作罕见且对安全性至关重要,双盲研究应首先优先考虑更常见和低风险的结果,如头痛、眼疲劳、视觉不适、任务表现和与调制深度相关的皮质激活,而癫痫发作发生率应通过仔细监测次要终点或在测量照明条件下的前瞻性监测来检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书