Associations between the Pathway to Excellence® framework and nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes: A systematic review.

Q3 Nursing
Nursing Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1097/NSG.0000000000000460
Kathryn A Connell, Nicole George, Hyunmin Yu, Matthew D McHugh
{"title":"Associations between the Pathway to Excellence® framework and nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes: A systematic review.","authors":"Kathryn A Connell, Nicole George, Hyunmin Yu, Matthew D McHugh","doi":"10.1097/NSG.0000000000000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supportive nursing practice environments are consistently associated with improved nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. The American Nurses Credentialing Center's Pathway to Excellence® (Pathway) program is designed to establish and sustain healthy work environments, yet the empirical evidence evaluating its outcomes remains fragmented.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically synthesize quantitative evidence examining the association between Pathway designation or Pathway standards and nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative systematic review was conducted in January 2026 using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase to identify peer-reviewed studies examining nurse, patient, or organizational outcomes associated with Pathway designation or standards. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight US-based observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Across diverse health care settings, Pathway designation or stronger alignment with Pathway standards was consistently associated with more favorable nurse work environments, lower burnout and intent to leave, stronger engagement in evidence-based practice, higher patient satisfaction, and more positive organizational safety climates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence indicates that Pathway designation and standards are positively associated with nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. Although causal inference is limited, the consistency of findings supports Pathway as a meaningful organizational strategy for strengthening professional nursing practice environments and advancing health care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":35641,"journal":{"name":"Nursing","volume":"56 9","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NSG.0000000000000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Supportive nursing practice environments are consistently associated with improved nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. The American Nurses Credentialing Center's Pathway to Excellence® (Pathway) program is designed to establish and sustain healthy work environments, yet the empirical evidence evaluating its outcomes remains fragmented.

Purpose: To systematically synthesize quantitative evidence examining the association between Pathway designation or Pathway standards and nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes.

Methods: A quantitative systematic review was conducted in January 2026 using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase to identify peer-reviewed studies examining nurse, patient, or organizational outcomes associated with Pathway designation or standards. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists.

Results: Eight US-based observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Across diverse health care settings, Pathway designation or stronger alignment with Pathway standards was consistently associated with more favorable nurse work environments, lower burnout and intent to leave, stronger engagement in evidence-based practice, higher patient satisfaction, and more positive organizational safety climates.

Conclusion: The evidence indicates that Pathway designation and standards are positively associated with nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. Although causal inference is limited, the consistency of findings supports Pathway as a meaningful organizational strategy for strengthening professional nursing practice environments and advancing health care quality.

卓越之路®框架与护士、患者和组织结果之间的关系:系统回顾。
背景:支持性护理实践环境始终与改善护士、患者和组织结果相关。美国护士资格认证中心的卓越之路(Pathway)项目旨在建立和维持健康的工作环境,但评估其结果的经验证据仍然是碎片化的。目的:系统地综合量化证据,研究路径指定或路径标准与护士、患者和组织结果之间的关系。方法:于2026年1月使用PubMed、CINAHL和Embase进行了定量系统评价,以确定同行评审的研究,检查与路径指定或标准相关的护士、患者或组织结果。偏见风险由两位作者使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估清单独立评估。结果:8项美国观察性研究符合纳入标准。在不同的医疗保健环境中,路径指定或与路径标准更强的一致性始终与更有利的护士工作环境、更低的倦怠和离职意愿、更强的循证实践参与度、更高的患者满意度和更积极的组织安全氛围相关。结论:有证据表明,路径指定和标准与护士、患者和组织的结果呈正相关。虽然因果推理有限,但研究结果的一致性支持Pathway作为加强专业护理实践环境和提高卫生保健质量的有意义的组织策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing
Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
338
期刊介绍: Nursing2020 (ISSN 0360-4039; online ISSN 1538-8689) published its first issue in November 1971, under founders Gene W. Jackson and Daniel Cheney. In the intervening years, its circulation has grown to over 150,000, making it one of the largest nursing journals in the world. Published monthly, Nursing2020 is widely regarded as offering current, practical contents to its readers, and has won many editorial awards testifying to the quality of its copy and graphics. The editorial and clinical staff, a 19-member Editorial Board of distinguished clinicians and practitioners, and over 100 invited reviewers help ensure the quality of this publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书