Predictive Tools for the Presence of Significant Coronary Artery Disease Requiring Intervention in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Thana Thongsricome, Sarawut Siwamogsatham, Weerapat Kositanurit, Somchai Eiam-Ong, Khajohn Tiranathanagul
{"title":"Predictive Tools for the Presence of Significant Coronary Artery Disease Requiring Intervention in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Thana Thongsricome, Sarawut Siwamogsatham, Weerapat Kositanurit, Somchai Eiam-Ong, Khajohn Tiranathanagul","doi":"10.1111/sdi.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hemodialysis (HD) patients have increased cardiovascular risk. Coronary artery disease (CAD) may not typically manifest in these patients, and the investigational results can be confounded by the fluctuation of body fluid and electrolytes. This study explored the accuracy of these findings in identifying CAD in HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical record data of all HD patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed as a discovery cohort to identify factors discriminating patients with and without significant CAG-established CAD. HD patients receiving CAG between April 2021 and March 2023 were assigned as a validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discovery and validation cohorts included 108 and 41 patients, respectively. Chest pain out of the dialysis session, but not pulmonary congestion/edema nor other intradialytic events, was associated with significant CAD (odds ratio 3.281, 95% CI 1.313-8.200). The presence of regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) from echocardiogram, but not other echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings, significantly predicted significant CAD (odds ratio 2.579, 95% CI 1.052-6.324). Initial high-sensitivity troponin T > 111 ng/L and percent of troponin change > 22% had area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.89) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.85), respectively, for predicting CAD. Applying a combination of these predictors resulted in a specificity of 100%, but low sensitivity for CAD in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most intradialytic symptoms possibly result from noncardiac etiologies, while chest pain out of the HD session should alarm the physicians for further management. Applying the suggested cardiac enzyme cut points or the presence of RWMA could prioritize at-risk patients for timed cardiologist referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have increased cardiovascular risk. Coronary artery disease (CAD) may not typically manifest in these patients, and the investigational results can be confounded by the fluctuation of body fluid and electrolytes. This study explored the accuracy of these findings in identifying CAD in HD patients.

Methods: Medical record data of all HD patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed as a discovery cohort to identify factors discriminating patients with and without significant CAG-established CAD. HD patients receiving CAG between April 2021 and March 2023 were assigned as a validation cohort.

Results: The discovery and validation cohorts included 108 and 41 patients, respectively. Chest pain out of the dialysis session, but not pulmonary congestion/edema nor other intradialytic events, was associated with significant CAD (odds ratio 3.281, 95% CI 1.313-8.200). The presence of regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) from echocardiogram, but not other echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings, significantly predicted significant CAD (odds ratio 2.579, 95% CI 1.052-6.324). Initial high-sensitivity troponin T > 111 ng/L and percent of troponin change > 22% had area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.89) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.85), respectively, for predicting CAD. Applying a combination of these predictors resulted in a specificity of 100%, but low sensitivity for CAD in the validation cohort.

Conclusion: Most intradialytic symptoms possibly result from noncardiac etiologies, while chest pain out of the HD session should alarm the physicians for further management. Applying the suggested cardiac enzyme cut points or the presence of RWMA could prioritize at-risk patients for timed cardiologist referral.

慢性血液透析患者存在需要干预的显著冠状动脉疾病的预测工具
目的:血液透析(HD)患者心血管风险增加。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)可能不会在这些患者中典型地表现出来,并且研究结果可能因体液和电解质的波动而混淆。本研究探讨了这些发现在鉴别HD患者CAD时的准确性。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年3月在一家三级医院接受冠状动脉造影(CAG)的所有HD患者的病历数据,作为一个发现队列,以确定区分有或没有明显CAG建立的CAD患者的因素。2021年4月至2023年3月期间接受CAG治疗的HD患者被分配为验证队列。结果:发现队列和验证队列分别包括108例和41例患者。透析后的胸痛与显著的CAD相关(优势比3.281,95% CI 1.313-8.200),但与肺充血/水肿或其他透析内事件无关。超声心动图显示区域壁运动异常(RWMA),但其他超声心动图和心电图结果未显示,可显著预测冠心病(优势比2.579,95% CI 1.052-6.324)。用于预测CAD的初始高灵敏度肌钙蛋白T > 111 ng/L和肌钙蛋白变化百分比> 22%的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.89)和0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.85)。在验证队列中,应用这些预测因子的组合导致对CAD的特异性为100%,但敏感性较低。结论:大多数分析症状可能是由非心脏病因引起的,而HD期的胸痛应引起医生的注意,以便进一步处理。应用建议的心脏酶切点或RWMA的存在可以优先考虑有风险的患者,以便定时转诊心脏病专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书