Integration of Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Network-Based Machine Learning Identifies Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Associated Candidate Biomarkers and Exploratory Immune Correlates in Osteoarthritis.

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Hanyu Wang, Zhikang Chen, Shikai Chen, Honglin Pi, Qianqian Liang, Li Wang
{"title":"Integration of Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Network-Based Machine Learning Identifies Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Associated Candidate Biomarkers and Exploratory Immune Correlates in Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Hanyu Wang, Zhikang Chen, Shikai Chen, Honglin Pi, Qianqian Liang, Li Wang","doi":"10.2174/0115665232502221260728112834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a whole-joint disease involving coordinated changes in subchondral bone, Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem cells (BM-MSCs), and synovium. This study aimed to identify BM-MSC-associated and OA-related candidate biomarkers and evaluate their potential diagnostic and immune-related relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scRNA-seq dataset GSE147287 was used to construct an OA subchondral bonemarrow atlas, identify BM-MSC populations, perform BM-MSC sub-clustering, and derive BMMSC co-expression modules and hub genes using hdWGCNA. Three synovial transcriptomic datasets (GSE55457, GSE55235, and GSE55584) were integrated as the training cohort after datasetspecific log2 (expression + 1) transformation and ComBat correction, whereas GSE12021 was processed independently as an external validation cohort. BM-MSC hub genes were intersected with OA-related synovial DEGs and further prioritized using LASSO, SVM-RFE, and XGBoost. A combined four-gene model was constructed using Firth's penalized logistic regression. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC analysis, cellular expression was validated in IL-1β-stimulated hBMSCs by qRT-PCR, and immune-cell and Hallmark pathway correlations were assessed using ssGSEA and Spearman analysis with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single-cell atlas contained nine major cell types, and BM-MSC sub-clustering identified four transcriptionally distinct subclusters. Cross-tissue integration yielded 35 BM-MSCassociated and OA-related candidate genes, from which EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC were selected. In the training cohort, the AUCs were 0.890 (95% CI, 0.792-0.989) for EFEMP2, 0.896 (95% CI, 0.802-0.990) for CTSO, 0.892 (95% CI, 0.797-0.987) for SPRY1, and 0.769 (95% CI, 0.630-0.908) for NFIC. In GSE12021, the corresponding AUCs were 0.867 (95% CI, 0.698-1.000), 0.922 (95% CI, 0.801-1.000), 0.922 (95% CI, 0.797-1.000), and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.674-1.000), respectively. The combined four-gene model achieved AUCs of 0.998 (0.993-1.000) in the training cohort and 1.000 (1.000-1.000) in GSE12021. qRT-PCR confirmed the upregulation of EFEMP2 and CTSO and the downregulation of SPRY1 and NFIC in IL-1β-stimulated hBMSCs. After Benjamini- Hochberg correction, no immune-cell or Hallmark pathway correlations remained statistically significant, although several moderate exploratory trends were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC represent BM-MSC-associated and OA-related candidate biomarkers. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating framework for characterizing OA-related stromal states and developing future tissue-fitness or patient-stratification tools, but further clinical and tissue-specific validation is required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC were identified as BM-MSC-associated and OArelated candidate biomarkers. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating framework for characterizing OA-related stromal states and developing future tissue-state assessment or patientstratification tools, although further tissue-specific and clinical validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10798,"journal":{"name":"Current gene therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115665232502221260728112834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a whole-joint disease involving coordinated changes in subchondral bone, Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem cells (BM-MSCs), and synovium. This study aimed to identify BM-MSC-associated and OA-related candidate biomarkers and evaluate their potential diagnostic and immune-related relevance.

Methods: The scRNA-seq dataset GSE147287 was used to construct an OA subchondral bonemarrow atlas, identify BM-MSC populations, perform BM-MSC sub-clustering, and derive BMMSC co-expression modules and hub genes using hdWGCNA. Three synovial transcriptomic datasets (GSE55457, GSE55235, and GSE55584) were integrated as the training cohort after datasetspecific log2 (expression + 1) transformation and ComBat correction, whereas GSE12021 was processed independently as an external validation cohort. BM-MSC hub genes were intersected with OA-related synovial DEGs and further prioritized using LASSO, SVM-RFE, and XGBoost. A combined four-gene model was constructed using Firth's penalized logistic regression. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC analysis, cellular expression was validated in IL-1β-stimulated hBMSCs by qRT-PCR, and immune-cell and Hallmark pathway correlations were assessed using ssGSEA and Spearman analysis with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.

Results: The single-cell atlas contained nine major cell types, and BM-MSC sub-clustering identified four transcriptionally distinct subclusters. Cross-tissue integration yielded 35 BM-MSCassociated and OA-related candidate genes, from which EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC were selected. In the training cohort, the AUCs were 0.890 (95% CI, 0.792-0.989) for EFEMP2, 0.896 (95% CI, 0.802-0.990) for CTSO, 0.892 (95% CI, 0.797-0.987) for SPRY1, and 0.769 (95% CI, 0.630-0.908) for NFIC. In GSE12021, the corresponding AUCs were 0.867 (95% CI, 0.698-1.000), 0.922 (95% CI, 0.801-1.000), 0.922 (95% CI, 0.797-1.000), and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.674-1.000), respectively. The combined four-gene model achieved AUCs of 0.998 (0.993-1.000) in the training cohort and 1.000 (1.000-1.000) in GSE12021. qRT-PCR confirmed the upregulation of EFEMP2 and CTSO and the downregulation of SPRY1 and NFIC in IL-1β-stimulated hBMSCs. After Benjamini- Hochberg correction, no immune-cell or Hallmark pathway correlations remained statistically significant, although several moderate exploratory trends were observed.

Discussion: EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC represent BM-MSC-associated and OA-related candidate biomarkers. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating framework for characterizing OA-related stromal states and developing future tissue-fitness or patient-stratification tools, but further clinical and tissue-specific validation is required.

Conclusion: EFEMP2, CTSO, SPRY1, and NFIC were identified as BM-MSC-associated and OArelated candidate biomarkers. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating framework for characterizing OA-related stromal states and developing future tissue-state assessment or patientstratification tools, although further tissue-specific and clinical validation is required.

整合单细胞转录组学和基于网络的机器学习识别骨关节炎中骨髓间充质干细胞相关的候选生物标志物和探索性免疫相关因子。
骨关节炎(OA)是一种全关节疾病,涉及软骨下骨、骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)和滑膜的协同变化。本研究旨在鉴定脑胶质瘤相关和oa相关的候选生物标志物,并评估其潜在的诊断和免疫相关性。方法:使用scRNA-seq数据集GSE147287构建OA软骨下骨髓图谱,鉴定BM-MSC群体,进行BM-MSC亚聚类,并使用hdWGCNA获得BMMSC共表达模块和枢纽基因。三个滑膜转录组数据集(GSE55457、GSE55235和GSE55584)经过数据特异性log2 (expression + 1)转换和ComBat校正后被整合为训练队列,而GSE12021被独立处理为外部验证队列。BM-MSC中心基因与oa相关滑膜deg相交,并使用LASSO、SVM-RFE和XGBoost进一步确定优先级。采用Firth惩罚逻辑回归构建了四基因组合模型。通过ROC分析评估诊断性能,通过qRT-PCR验证il -1β刺激的hBMSCs的细胞表达,使用ssGSEA和Spearman分析评估免疫细胞和Hallmark通路的相关性,并进行benjami - hochberg校正。结果:单细胞图谱包含9种主要的细胞类型,BM-MSC亚簇鉴定出4个转录不同的亚簇。跨组织整合得到35个bm - mscc相关和oa相关的候选基因,从中选择EFEMP2、CTSO、SPRY1和NFIC。在训练队列中,EFEMP2的auc为0.890 (95% CI, 0.792-0.989), CTSO的auc为0.896 (95% CI, 0.802-0.990), SPRY1的auc为0.892 (95% CI, 0.797-0.987), NFIC的auc为0.769 (95% CI, 0.630-0.908)。在GSE12021中,相应的auc分别为0.867 (95% CI, 0.698-1.000)、0.922 (95% CI, 0.801-1.000)、0.922 (95% CI, 0.797-1.000)和0.856 (95% CI, 0.674-1.000)。四基因联合模型在训练队列中的auc为0.998(0.993-1.000),在GSE12021中的auc为1.000(1.000-1.000)。qRT-PCR证实了il -1β刺激的hBMSCs中EFEMP2和CTSO上调,SPRY1和NFIC下调。在Benjamini- Hochberg校正后,尽管观察到一些适度的探索性趋势,但免疫细胞或贺曼通路的相关性仍然没有统计学意义。讨论:EFEMP2、CTSO、SPRY1和NFIC代表bm - msc相关和oa相关的候选生物标志物。这些发现为表征oa相关的基质状态和开发未来的组织适应度或患者分层工具提供了假设生成框架,但需要进一步的临床和组织特异性验证。结论:EFEMP2、CTSO、SPRY1和NFIC被确定为bm - msc相关和o相关的候选生物标志物。尽管需要进一步的组织特异性和临床验证,但这些发现为表征oa相关的基质状态和开发未来的组织状态评估或患者分层工具提供了假设生成框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current gene therapy
Current gene therapy 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Current Gene Therapy is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal aimed at academic and industrial scientists with an interest in major topics concerning basic research and clinical applications of gene and cell therapy of diseases. Cell therapy manuscripts can also include application in diseases when cells have been genetically modified. Current Gene Therapy publishes full-length/mini reviews and original research on the latest developments in gene transfer and gene expression analysis, vector development, cellular genetic engineering, animal models and human clinical applications of gene and cell therapy for the treatment of diseases. Current Gene Therapy publishes reviews and original research containing experimental data on gene and cell therapy. The journal also includes manuscripts on technological advances, ethical and regulatory considerations of gene and cell therapy. Reviews should provide the reader with a comprehensive assessment of any area of experimental biology applied to molecular medicine that is not only of significance within a particular field of gene therapy and cell therapy but also of interest to investigators in other fields. Authors are encouraged to provide their own assessment and vision for future advances. Reviews are also welcome on late breaking discoveries on which substantial literature has not yet been amassed. Such reviews provide a forum for sharply focused topics of recent experimental investigations in gene therapy primarily to make these results accessible to both clinical and basic researchers. Manuscripts containing experimental data should be original data, not previously published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书