Effect of Pre-Transplant Sensitization on Kidney Allograft Survival Following Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Decade of Experience from an Academic Transplant Center.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Andrew D Santeusanio, Fahima Mahir, Matias Facciuto, Ron Shapiro, Veronica Delaney, Thomas Schiano, Jang Moon, Sander Florman, Leona Kim-Schluger, Fasika Tedla, Arjun Bhansali
{"title":"Effect of Pre-Transplant Sensitization on Kidney Allograft Survival Following Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Decade of Experience from an Academic Transplant Center.","authors":"Andrew D Santeusanio, Fahima Mahir, Matias Facciuto, Ron Shapiro, Veronica Delaney, Thomas Schiano, Jang Moon, Sander Florman, Leona Kim-Schluger, Fasika Tedla, Arjun Bhansali","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding the impact of pre-transplant sensitization on kidney allograft outcomes following simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult SLK transplant recipients during the decade from 2010 to 2020. Patients were classified based on complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatching (CDC-CXM) as well as the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) and followed until study conclusion on January 1, 2021. Cox-proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify clinical variables associated with combined patient and allograft survival as well as biopsy proven kidney rejection (BPAR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients were included in the study (16 positive CDC-CXM and 31 with DSA). Overall patient and allograft survival was 91.1% at 1-year and 68.9% at study conclusion after a median of 4.4 years, with corresponding death-censored kidney survival of 98.8% and 91.2%. In the multivariable analysis, a positive CDC-CXM (HR = 3.79; 95% CI 1.70-8.46) but not pre-formed DSA was associated with patient and graft loss. BPAR occurred in 12 patients (13.3%) and was higher among patients with DSA >5,000 (HR = 3.69; 95% CI 1.14-11.98), although this did not impact overall kidney survival. DSA cleared in 85% of patients following SLK transplant but persisted in three patients with DQ-specific antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A positive CDC-CXM but not the presence of pre-formed DSA was associated with worse outcomes following SLK transplantation, with overall kidney survival primarily driven by death with a functioning allograft. DSA >5,000 MFI increased the risk for BPAR, and DSA to the class II DQ antigen were incompletely cleared following SLK transplant; however, overall kidney survival was not impacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"40 8","pages":"e70656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13500032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are conflicting data regarding the impact of pre-transplant sensitization on kidney allograft outcomes following simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult SLK transplant recipients during the decade from 2010 to 2020. Patients were classified based on complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatching (CDC-CXM) as well as the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) and followed until study conclusion on January 1, 2021. Cox-proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify clinical variables associated with combined patient and allograft survival as well as biopsy proven kidney rejection (BPAR).

Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the study (16 positive CDC-CXM and 31 with DSA). Overall patient and allograft survival was 91.1% at 1-year and 68.9% at study conclusion after a median of 4.4 years, with corresponding death-censored kidney survival of 98.8% and 91.2%. In the multivariable analysis, a positive CDC-CXM (HR = 3.79; 95% CI 1.70-8.46) but not pre-formed DSA was associated with patient and graft loss. BPAR occurred in 12 patients (13.3%) and was higher among patients with DSA >5,000 (HR = 3.69; 95% CI 1.14-11.98), although this did not impact overall kidney survival. DSA cleared in 85% of patients following SLK transplant but persisted in three patients with DQ-specific antibodies.

Conclusions: A positive CDC-CXM but not the presence of pre-formed DSA was associated with worse outcomes following SLK transplantation, with overall kidney survival primarily driven by death with a functioning allograft. DSA >5,000 MFI increased the risk for BPAR, and DSA to the class II DQ antigen were incompletely cleared following SLK transplant; however, overall kidney survival was not impacted.

移植前致敏对同时进行肝肾移植后同种异体肾移植存活的影响:来自学术移植中心的十年经验。
背景:关于移植前致敏对同时肝肾(SLK)移植后同种异体肾移植结果的影响,有相互矛盾的数据。方法:这是一项2010 - 2020年间成人SLK移植受者的单中心、回顾性研究。根据补体依赖性细胞毒性交叉配型(CDC-CXM)和供体特异性抗体(DSA)对患者进行分类,并随访至2021年1月1日研究结束。采用cox -比例风险模型来确定与患者和同种异体移植联合生存以及活检证实的肾排斥反应(BPAR)相关的临床变量。结果:共纳入90例患者,其中CDC-CXM阳性16例,DSA阳性31例。患者和同种异体移植的总生存率在1年时为91.1%,研究结束时为68.9%,中位时间为4.4年,相应的死亡切除肾生存率为98.8%和91.2%。在多变量分析中,CDC-CXM阳性(HR = 3.79; 95% CI 1.70-8.46)但未预形成DSA与患者和移植物损失相关。12例患者(13.3%)发生了BPAR, DSA患者中BPAR发生率更高(HR = 3.69; 95% CI 1.14-11.98),尽管这并不影响总体肾脏生存。SLK移植后,85%的患者清除了DSA,但有3名患者存在dq特异性抗体。结论:CDC-CXM阳性但不存在预形成的DSA与SLK移植后较差的结果相关,总体肾脏存活主要由功能正常的同种异体移植物死亡驱动。DSA bb0 5000 MFI增加了BPAR的风险,SLK移植后DSAⅱ类DQ抗原未完全清除;然而,总体肾脏存活并未受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书