Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with different types of joint configurations linked by old to new epoxy treatment

Q2 Engineering
Alhussein Abbas Fadhel, Ra’id Fadhil Abbas, Asma Mahdi Ali
{"title":"Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with different types of joint configurations linked by old to new epoxy treatment","authors":"Alhussein Abbas Fadhel,&nbsp;Ra’id Fadhil Abbas,&nbsp;Asma Mahdi Ali","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01734-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study experimentally investigates the structural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with different construction-joint configurations treated using an Old-New epoxy bonding agent. Eleven simply supported RC beams with dimensions of 250× 300 × 1850 mm and a concrete grade of 35 MPa were cast and tested under two-point loading. The experimental program included one monolithic reference beam and ten jointed beams cast in two stages with a 24-hour interval. The investigated joint configurations were a 45° inclined joint, a 90° vertical joint, a horizontal joint, and a key joint located in the flexural zone, in addition to a 90° vertical joint located in the shear zone. For each joint configuration, one specimen was left untreated, while the corresponding specimen was treated with Old-New epoxy before the second concrete pour. The beams were evaluated in terms of ultimate load, first visible cracking load, load–deflection response, stiffness, ductility, toughness, strain behavior, and crack pattern. The results showed that construction joints reduced the ultimate load compared with the monolithic reference beam, with untreated specimens showing reductions between 8.3% and 13.1%. The epoxy treatment improved the ultimate load of most flexural-zone joints, especially the 90° vertical flexural joint, which achieved a 7.16% increase compared with its untreated counterpart, although it remained 4.5% below the reference beam. The treatment also enhanced cracking resistance, increasing the first visible cracking load by 68.1% for the 90° flexural joint and 88.4% for the 90° shear-zone joint. However, the shear-zone joint showed a 7.01% reduction in ultimate load after treatment, indicating that epoxy alone was less effective under shear-dominated interface conditions. Overall, the Old-New epoxy treatment was more beneficial for flexural-zone joints than shear-zone joints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4559 - 4575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01734-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the structural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with different construction-joint configurations treated using an Old-New epoxy bonding agent. Eleven simply supported RC beams with dimensions of 250× 300 × 1850 mm and a concrete grade of 35 MPa were cast and tested under two-point loading. The experimental program included one monolithic reference beam and ten jointed beams cast in two stages with a 24-hour interval. The investigated joint configurations were a 45° inclined joint, a 90° vertical joint, a horizontal joint, and a key joint located in the flexural zone, in addition to a 90° vertical joint located in the shear zone. For each joint configuration, one specimen was left untreated, while the corresponding specimen was treated with Old-New epoxy before the second concrete pour. The beams were evaluated in terms of ultimate load, first visible cracking load, load–deflection response, stiffness, ductility, toughness, strain behavior, and crack pattern. The results showed that construction joints reduced the ultimate load compared with the monolithic reference beam, with untreated specimens showing reductions between 8.3% and 13.1%. The epoxy treatment improved the ultimate load of most flexural-zone joints, especially the 90° vertical flexural joint, which achieved a 7.16% increase compared with its untreated counterpart, although it remained 4.5% below the reference beam. The treatment also enhanced cracking resistance, increasing the first visible cracking load by 68.1% for the 90° flexural joint and 88.4% for the 90° shear-zone joint. However, the shear-zone joint showed a 7.01% reduction in ultimate load after treatment, indicating that epoxy alone was less effective under shear-dominated interface conditions. Overall, the Old-New epoxy treatment was more beneficial for flexural-zone joints than shear-zone joints.

新旧环氧树脂处理连接不同类型节点配置的钢筋混凝土梁的结构性能
本研究通过实验研究了使用新旧环氧胶粘剂处理的不同结构节点配置的钢筋混凝土梁的结构性能。对11根尺寸为250× 300 × 1850 mm、混凝土等级为35 MPa的钢筋混凝土简支梁进行了浇筑和两点荷载试验。实验方案包括1根整体参考梁和10根节理梁,分两阶段浇筑,间隔24小时。研究的节理构型包括45°倾斜节理、90°垂直节理、水平节理和位于受弯区的关键节理,以及位于剪切区的90°垂直节理。对于每一种节点配置,一个试件不进行处理,对应的试件在第二次混凝土浇筑前进行旧-新环氧树脂处理。根据极限荷载、首次可见开裂荷载、荷载-挠度响应、刚度、延性、韧性、应变行为和裂纹模式对梁进行了评估。结果表明,与整体参考梁相比,施工缝降低了极限荷载,未经处理的试件的极限荷载降低幅度在8.3%至13.1%之间。环氧树脂处理提高了大多数弯曲区节点的极限载荷,特别是90°垂直弯曲节点,与未处理的节点相比,其极限载荷增加了7.16%,但仍比参考梁低4.5%。该处理还增强了抗裂性,90°弯曲节点的第一次可见开裂载荷增加了68.1%,90°剪切区节点增加了88.4%。然而,剪切区接头处理后的极限载荷降低了7.01%,表明在剪切为主的界面条件下,单独使用环氧树脂的效果较差。总的来说,新旧环氧树脂处理对弯曲区接缝比剪切区接缝更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书