A novel GA-GBM based model to construct CPT-SPT relationship

Q2 Engineering
Shuai Fang, Haoqing Xu, Nan Zhang, Xinpeng Lv, Shi He
{"title":"A novel GA-GBM based model to construct CPT-SPT relationship","authors":"Shuai Fang,&nbsp;Haoqing Xu,&nbsp;Nan Zhang,&nbsp;Xinpeng Lv,&nbsp;Shi He","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01731-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous relationships between Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) have been developed which consist of empirical formulas, statistical models, and machine learning models. However, these models often suffer from low prediction accuracy and limited generalizability when converting CPT data to SPT <i>N</i> or SPT <i>N</i><sub><i>60</i></sub>. In this study, a GA-GBM based model was developed to construct the CPT-SPT relationship in order to address the aforementioned issues. The raw database was segmented by intervals of soil behavior type index (<i>I</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>) using the GA, and the BP method was then employed to identify and eliminate outliers within each <i>I</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> interval. The preprocessed dataset was analyzed using the GBM technique with the results returned to the GA to iteratively adjust boundaries of each <i>I</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> interval (i.e. Method A) or obtain an optimal number of <i>I</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> interval (i.e. Method B) that optimizes the predictive performance of the proposed model. As compared to other widely used models reported in literature, the accuracy of predicted SPT <i>N</i><sub><i>60</i></sub> from CPT data was significantly improved with an R² of 0.80 and an RMSE of only 5.80. For the new dataset, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.73 was obtained by the proposed model which is much higher than other models. It is demonstrated the proposed GA-GBM model exhibits strong generalization capability and can predict SPT <i>N</i><sub><i>60</i></sub> more accurately. Overall, the proposed model offers new insights into the relationship between CPT and SPT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4497 - 4513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01731-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous relationships between Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) have been developed which consist of empirical formulas, statistical models, and machine learning models. However, these models often suffer from low prediction accuracy and limited generalizability when converting CPT data to SPT N or SPT N60. In this study, a GA-GBM based model was developed to construct the CPT-SPT relationship in order to address the aforementioned issues. The raw database was segmented by intervals of soil behavior type index (Ic) using the GA, and the BP method was then employed to identify and eliminate outliers within each Ic interval. The preprocessed dataset was analyzed using the GBM technique with the results returned to the GA to iteratively adjust boundaries of each Ic interval (i.e. Method A) or obtain an optimal number of Ic interval (i.e. Method B) that optimizes the predictive performance of the proposed model. As compared to other widely used models reported in literature, the accuracy of predicted SPT N60 from CPT data was significantly improved with an R² of 0.80 and an RMSE of only 5.80. For the new dataset, R2 of 0.73 was obtained by the proposed model which is much higher than other models. It is demonstrated the proposed GA-GBM model exhibits strong generalization capability and can predict SPT N60 more accurately. Overall, the proposed model offers new insights into the relationship between CPT and SPT.

基于GA-GBM的CPT-SPT关系构建模型
锥贯入测试(CPT)和标准贯入测试(SPT)之间的许多关系已经发展起来,包括经验公式、统计模型和机器学习模型。然而,当将CPT数据转换为SPT N或SPT N60时,这些模型往往存在预测精度低和推广能力有限的问题。为了解决上述问题,本研究构建了基于GA-GBM的CPT-SPT关系模型。利用遗传算法对原始数据库进行土壤行为类型指数(Ic)区间的分割,然后利用BP方法对每个Ic区间内的异常值进行识别和剔除。使用GBM技术对预处理数据集进行分析,并将结果返回给遗传算法,迭代调整每个Ic区间的边界(即方法A)或获得优化所提模型预测性能的最佳Ic区间数(即方法B)。与文献报道的其他广泛使用的模型相比,CPT数据预测SPT N60的准确性显著提高,R²为0.80,RMSE仅为5.80。对于新数据集,该模型的R2为0.73,远高于其他模型。结果表明,GA-GBM模型具有较强的泛化能力,能较准确地预测SPT N60。总的来说,该模型为CPT和SPT之间的关系提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书