Machine learning prediction of seismic response parameters of reinforced concrete buildings under different site and ground motion conditions

Q2 Engineering
Hudson Gnanadurai, Revathy Jayaseelan, Gajalakshmi Pandulu
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of seismic response parameters of reinforced concrete buildings under different site and ground motion conditions","authors":"Hudson Gnanadurai,&nbsp;Revathy Jayaseelan,&nbsp;Gajalakshmi Pandulu","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01712-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting seismic response parameters is vital for designing reinforced concrete structures, but traditional approaches can become computationally intensive when multiple seismic scenarios are evaluated. This study presents a unified machine learning framework to predict storey-level seismic responses of a 10-storey RC special moment-resisting frame building. It explicitly integrates seismic hazard features, site conditions, and response variability. A comprehensive dataset of around 1300 samples was generated using ETABS-based nonlinear analyses, considering seismic zones, soil types, and ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground acceleration, velocity, and displacement as inputs. The key response parameters analysed include storey displacement, inter-storey drift ratio, storey shear, and overturning moment. Three machine learning models, viz., Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, were developed and optimised via cross-validation. Among these methods, XGBoost performed the best, with test R² scores of 0.9936 for displacement, 0.9955 for inter-storey drift ratio, 0.9973 for storey shear, and 0.9941 for overturning moment. It reduced prediction errors by approximately 30% to 90% compared to RF and SVR, with the greatest improvement observed in storey shear prediction, resulting in a 21% increase in R² over SVR. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively models complex nonlinear seismic behaviour while significantly reducing computational costs. This method provides a practical, efficient tool for rapid seismic performance assessments and supports data-driven structural design aligned with Indian seismic code standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4199 - 4214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01712-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting seismic response parameters is vital for designing reinforced concrete structures, but traditional approaches can become computationally intensive when multiple seismic scenarios are evaluated. This study presents a unified machine learning framework to predict storey-level seismic responses of a 10-storey RC special moment-resisting frame building. It explicitly integrates seismic hazard features, site conditions, and response variability. A comprehensive dataset of around 1300 samples was generated using ETABS-based nonlinear analyses, considering seismic zones, soil types, and ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground acceleration, velocity, and displacement as inputs. The key response parameters analysed include storey displacement, inter-storey drift ratio, storey shear, and overturning moment. Three machine learning models, viz., Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, were developed and optimised via cross-validation. Among these methods, XGBoost performed the best, with test R² scores of 0.9936 for displacement, 0.9955 for inter-storey drift ratio, 0.9973 for storey shear, and 0.9941 for overturning moment. It reduced prediction errors by approximately 30% to 90% compared to RF and SVR, with the greatest improvement observed in storey shear prediction, resulting in a 21% increase in R² over SVR. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively models complex nonlinear seismic behaviour while significantly reducing computational costs. This method provides a practical, efficient tool for rapid seismic performance assessments and supports data-driven structural design aligned with Indian seismic code standards.

不同场地和地震动条件下钢筋混凝土建筑物地震反应参数的机器学习预测
预测地震反应参数对于设计钢筋混凝土结构至关重要,但当评估多种地震情景时,传统方法的计算量可能会很大。本研究提出了一个统一的机器学习框架来预测10层钢筋混凝土特殊抗弯矩框架建筑的层级地震反应。它明确地整合了地震危险特征、场地条件和响应变异性。使用基于etabs的非线性分析,将地震带、土壤类型和地面运动强度指标(如峰值地面加速度、速度和位移)作为输入,生成了大约1300个样本的综合数据集。分析的关键响应参数包括层间位移、层间位移比、层间剪力和倾覆力矩。三个机器学习模型,即随机森林,支持向量回归和极端梯度增强,通过交叉验证开发和优化。其中,XGBoost效果最好,位移试验R²值为0.9936,层间位移比试验R²值为0.9955,层间剪力试验R²值为0.9973,倾覆力矩试验R²值为0.9941。与RF和SVR相比,它将预测误差降低了约30%至90%,其中在层间剪切预测中观察到的改善最大,导致R²比SVR增加21%。这些发现表明,所提出的框架有效地模拟了复杂的非线性地震行为,同时显著降低了计算成本。该方法为快速地震性能评估提供了实用、高效的工具,并支持数据驱动的结构设计,符合印度地震规范标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书