Rakesh Gupta, Miguel Villagómez-Galindo, Gohar Ali, T. C. Manjunath, K. Ravibabu, Surajit Murasingh
{"title":"An opposition-based multi-objective Grey Wolf optimizer for time–cost–quality trade-off optimization in subcontractor selection","authors":"Rakesh Gupta, Miguel Villagómez-Galindo, Gohar Ali, T. C. Manjunath, K. Ravibabu, Surajit Murasingh","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01715-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subcontractor selection in construction projects involves complex decision-making due to the conflicting nature of multiple performance criteria, particularly time, cost, and quality (TCQ). This study proposes a novel Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (OBL-GWO) to effectively solve the multi-objective TCQS trade-off optimization problem in subcontractor selection. The proposed approach integrates opposition-based learning (OBL) into the standard Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) to enhance population diversity, accelerate convergence, and improve exploration–exploitation balance. A discrete 20-activity construction project is considered as a case study, where each activity can be executed by alternative subcontractors with varying performance levels. The optimization framework evaluates project duration and total cost using the Critical Path Method (CPM), while quality are incorporated as additional objective functions within a multi-objective optimization setting. The performance of the proposed OBL-GWO is benchmarked against Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO) and NDSII-GWO algorithm. To ensure a robust comparative assessment, widely accepted performance metrics, including Hypervolume (HV) and Spread (SP), are employed to evaluate the convergence and diversity of the obtained Pareto fronts. The results demonstrate that OBL-GWO consistently achieves superior performance in terms of solution quality, convergence speed, and distribution uniformity compared to the competing algorithms. Specifically, the proposed method provides a well-distributed Pareto front with higher HV values and lower SP values, indicating better diversity and proximity to the true Pareto-optimal front. The findings confirm that incorporating opposition-based learning significantly enhances the optimization capability of GWO for complex multi-objective construction problems. This study contributes a robust and efficient decision-support tool for subcontractor selection, enabling project managers to achieve balanced and sustainable trade-offs among time, cost and quality objectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4227 - 4237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01715-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subcontractor selection in construction projects involves complex decision-making due to the conflicting nature of multiple performance criteria, particularly time, cost, and quality (TCQ). This study proposes a novel Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (OBL-GWO) to effectively solve the multi-objective TCQS trade-off optimization problem in subcontractor selection. The proposed approach integrates opposition-based learning (OBL) into the standard Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) to enhance population diversity, accelerate convergence, and improve exploration–exploitation balance. A discrete 20-activity construction project is considered as a case study, where each activity can be executed by alternative subcontractors with varying performance levels. The optimization framework evaluates project duration and total cost using the Critical Path Method (CPM), while quality are incorporated as additional objective functions within a multi-objective optimization setting. The performance of the proposed OBL-GWO is benchmarked against Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO) and NDSII-GWO algorithm. To ensure a robust comparative assessment, widely accepted performance metrics, including Hypervolume (HV) and Spread (SP), are employed to evaluate the convergence and diversity of the obtained Pareto fronts. The results demonstrate that OBL-GWO consistently achieves superior performance in terms of solution quality, convergence speed, and distribution uniformity compared to the competing algorithms. Specifically, the proposed method provides a well-distributed Pareto front with higher HV values and lower SP values, indicating better diversity and proximity to the true Pareto-optimal front. The findings confirm that incorporating opposition-based learning significantly enhances the optimization capability of GWO for complex multi-objective construction problems. This study contributes a robust and efficient decision-support tool for subcontractor selection, enabling project managers to achieve balanced and sustainable trade-offs among time, cost and quality objectives.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.