An opposition-based multi-objective Grey Wolf optimizer for time–cost–quality trade-off optimization in subcontractor selection

Q2 Engineering
Rakesh Gupta, Miguel Villagómez-Galindo, Gohar Ali, T. C. Manjunath, K. Ravibabu, Surajit Murasingh
{"title":"An opposition-based multi-objective Grey Wolf optimizer for time–cost–quality trade-off optimization in subcontractor selection","authors":"Rakesh Gupta,&nbsp;Miguel Villagómez-Galindo,&nbsp;Gohar Ali,&nbsp;T. C. Manjunath,&nbsp;K. Ravibabu,&nbsp;Surajit Murasingh","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01715-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subcontractor selection in construction projects involves complex decision-making due to the conflicting nature of multiple performance criteria, particularly time, cost, and quality (TCQ). This study proposes a novel Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (OBL-GWO) to effectively solve the multi-objective TCQS trade-off optimization problem in subcontractor selection. The proposed approach integrates opposition-based learning (OBL) into the standard Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) to enhance population diversity, accelerate convergence, and improve exploration–exploitation balance. A discrete 20-activity construction project is considered as a case study, where each activity can be executed by alternative subcontractors with varying performance levels. The optimization framework evaluates project duration and total cost using the Critical Path Method (CPM), while quality are incorporated as additional objective functions within a multi-objective optimization setting. The performance of the proposed OBL-GWO is benchmarked against Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO) and NDSII-GWO algorithm. To ensure a robust comparative assessment, widely accepted performance metrics, including Hypervolume (HV) and Spread (SP), are employed to evaluate the convergence and diversity of the obtained Pareto fronts. The results demonstrate that OBL-GWO consistently achieves superior performance in terms of solution quality, convergence speed, and distribution uniformity compared to the competing algorithms. Specifically, the proposed method provides a well-distributed Pareto front with higher HV values and lower SP values, indicating better diversity and proximity to the true Pareto-optimal front. The findings confirm that incorporating opposition-based learning significantly enhances the optimization capability of GWO for complex multi-objective construction problems. This study contributes a robust and efficient decision-support tool for subcontractor selection, enabling project managers to achieve balanced and sustainable trade-offs among time, cost and quality objectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4227 - 4237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01715-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subcontractor selection in construction projects involves complex decision-making due to the conflicting nature of multiple performance criteria, particularly time, cost, and quality (TCQ). This study proposes a novel Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (OBL-GWO) to effectively solve the multi-objective TCQS trade-off optimization problem in subcontractor selection. The proposed approach integrates opposition-based learning (OBL) into the standard Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) to enhance population diversity, accelerate convergence, and improve exploration–exploitation balance. A discrete 20-activity construction project is considered as a case study, where each activity can be executed by alternative subcontractors with varying performance levels. The optimization framework evaluates project duration and total cost using the Critical Path Method (CPM), while quality are incorporated as additional objective functions within a multi-objective optimization setting. The performance of the proposed OBL-GWO is benchmarked against Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO) and NDSII-GWO algorithm. To ensure a robust comparative assessment, widely accepted performance metrics, including Hypervolume (HV) and Spread (SP), are employed to evaluate the convergence and diversity of the obtained Pareto fronts. The results demonstrate that OBL-GWO consistently achieves superior performance in terms of solution quality, convergence speed, and distribution uniformity compared to the competing algorithms. Specifically, the proposed method provides a well-distributed Pareto front with higher HV values and lower SP values, indicating better diversity and proximity to the true Pareto-optimal front. The findings confirm that incorporating opposition-based learning significantly enhances the optimization capability of GWO for complex multi-objective construction problems. This study contributes a robust and efficient decision-support tool for subcontractor selection, enabling project managers to achieve balanced and sustainable trade-offs among time, cost and quality objectives.

基于对立的多目标灰狼优化算法在分包商选择中的时间成本质量权衡优化
由于多个绩效标准,特别是时间、成本和质量(TCQ)的冲突性质,建筑项目中分包商的选择涉及复杂的决策。为有效解决分包商选择中的多目标TCQS权衡优化问题,提出了一种基于对立的灰狼优化器(OBL-GWO)。该方法将基于对立的学习(OBL)集成到标准的灰狼优化器(GWO)中,以增强种群多样性,加速收敛,改善探索-开发平衡。一个离散的20个活动的建设项目被视为一个案例研究,其中每个活动可以由具有不同绩效水平的替代分包商执行。优化框架使用关键路径法(CPM)评估项目持续时间和总成本,而质量被纳入多目标优化设置中的附加目标函数。本文提出的OBL-GWO算法与离散粒子群算法(DPSO)和NDSII-GWO算法进行了性能测试。为了确保稳健的比较评估,广泛接受的性能指标,包括Hypervolume (HV)和Spread (SP),被用来评估得到的Pareto front的收敛性和多样性。结果表明,与竞争算法相比,OBL-GWO在解质量、收敛速度和分布均匀性方面始终具有优越的性能。具体而言,该方法提供了一个分布均匀的帕累托锋面,具有较高的HV值和较低的SP值,表明了更好的多样性和接近真正的帕累托最优锋面。研究结果证实,结合基于对立的学习显著提高了GWO对复杂多目标构建问题的优化能力。本研究为分包商选择提供了一个强大而有效的决策支持工具,使项目经理能够在时间、成本和质量目标之间实现平衡和可持续的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书