Explainable machine learning surrogates for lateral pile response prediction in soft clay

Q2 Engineering
Saif Ahmed Santo, Md. Majidur Rahman, Matiur Rahman Raju
{"title":"Explainable machine learning surrogates for lateral pile response prediction in soft clay","authors":"Saif Ahmed Santo,&nbsp;Md. Majidur Rahman,&nbsp;Matiur Rahman Raju","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01739-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate prediction of lateral pile response requires computationally intensive nonlinear finite element analysis, limiting its use in routine design and large-scale parametric studies. This study presents a machine learning surrogate framework trained on 15,351 Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation simulations, generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling across an eleven-variable parametric space covering pile geometry, soil properties, loading conditions, and head fixity. Six structural response quantities were predicted simultaneously: maximum bending moment (<i>M</i><sub>max</sub>), lateral deflection (<i>δ</i><sub>max</sub>), shear force (<i>V</i><sub>max</sub>), pile head rotation (<i>θ</i><sub>head</sub>), peak soil reaction (<i>p</i><sub>max</sub>), and the soil capacity utilization ratio (<i>p/p</i><sub>ult</sub>). Extreme Gradient Boosting achieved R<sup>2</sup> of 0.989 (<i>M</i><sub>max</sub>), 0.819 (<i>δ</i><sub>max</sub>), 0.999 (<i>V</i><sub>max</sub>), 0.824 (<i>θ</i><sub>head</sub>), 0.988 (<i>p</i><sub>max</sub>), and 0.981 (<i>p/p</i><sub>ult</sub>) on a 20% hold-out set, with normalized root mean squared error not exceeding 5.86% across all targets. SHAP TreeExplainer analysis confirmed that lateral load and pile diameter are the dominant predictors, with opposing roles: lateral load governs moment demand while diameter controls deflection and rotation. Undrained shear strength ranked third across most targets. Head fixity reduces deflection by approximately 30 to 40% at high loads while increasing peak bending moment by 25 to 30%, indicating a clear trade-off between deflection control and structural moment demand. Three practical design tools were derived from the surrogate: a joint fixity and eccentricity design chart, closed-form power-law expressions for hand calculation, and a soil utilization index quantifying proximity to plastic failure. The framework provides a computationally efficient and physically interpretable basis for sensitivity analysis and preliminary design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4669 - 4695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01739-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate prediction of lateral pile response requires computationally intensive nonlinear finite element analysis, limiting its use in routine design and large-scale parametric studies. This study presents a machine learning surrogate framework trained on 15,351 Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation simulations, generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling across an eleven-variable parametric space covering pile geometry, soil properties, loading conditions, and head fixity. Six structural response quantities were predicted simultaneously: maximum bending moment (Mmax), lateral deflection (δmax), shear force (Vmax), pile head rotation (θhead), peak soil reaction (pmax), and the soil capacity utilization ratio (p/pult). Extreme Gradient Boosting achieved R2 of 0.989 (Mmax), 0.819 (δmax), 0.999 (Vmax), 0.824 (θhead), 0.988 (pmax), and 0.981 (p/pult) on a 20% hold-out set, with normalized root mean squared error not exceeding 5.86% across all targets. SHAP TreeExplainer analysis confirmed that lateral load and pile diameter are the dominant predictors, with opposing roles: lateral load governs moment demand while diameter controls deflection and rotation. Undrained shear strength ranked third across most targets. Head fixity reduces deflection by approximately 30 to 40% at high loads while increasing peak bending moment by 25 to 30%, indicating a clear trade-off between deflection control and structural moment demand. Three practical design tools were derived from the surrogate: a joint fixity and eccentricity design chart, closed-form power-law expressions for hand calculation, and a soil utilization index quantifying proximity to plastic failure. The framework provides a computationally efficient and physically interpretable basis for sensitivity analysis and preliminary design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay.

软粘土中可解释的机器学习替代侧桩响应预测
侧桩响应的准确预测需要计算量大的非线性有限元分析,限制了其在常规设计和大规模参数研究中的应用。本研究提出了一个机器学习代理框架,该框架在非线性温克勒地基模拟的15,351根梁上进行了训练,该模型由拉丁超立方体采样生成,跨越11变量参数空间,包括桩的几何形状、土壤特性、加载条件和头部固固性。同时预测了6个结构响应量:最大弯矩(Mmax)、侧向挠度(δmax)、剪力(Vmax)、桩顶旋转(θhead)、峰值土反力(pmax)和土壤容量利用率(p/pult)。在20%的持有集上,Extreme Gradient Boosting实现了R2为0.989 (Mmax)、0.819 (δmax)、0.999 (Vmax)、0.824 (θhead)、0.988 (pmax)和0.981 (p/pult),所有目标的标准化均方根误差不超过5.86%。SHAP TreeExplainer分析证实,横向荷载和桩径是主要的预测因子,它们具有相反的作用:横向荷载控制弯矩需求,而直径控制挠度和旋转。不排水抗剪强度在大多数靶材中排名第三。在高负载下,头部固定减少了大约30 - 40%的挠度,同时增加了25 - 30%的峰值弯矩,这表明挠度控制和结构力矩需求之间存在明确的权衡。从代理中导出了三个实用的设计工具:联合固结和偏心设计图表,用于手动计算的封闭形式幂律表达式,以及量化塑性破坏接近程度的土壤利用指数。该框架为软土中横向荷载桩的敏感性分析和初步设计提供了计算效率高、物理可解释的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书