Performance evaluation and parametric optimization of advanced mechanical rebar couplers as an alternative to conventional lap splicing

Q2 Engineering
Atul S. Kurzekar, Sanjivkumar Harinkhede, Payal Pendharkar
{"title":"Performance evaluation and parametric optimization of advanced mechanical rebar couplers as an alternative to conventional lap splicing","authors":"Atul S. Kurzekar,&nbsp;Sanjivkumar Harinkhede,&nbsp;Payal Pendharkar","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01729-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reinforcing bar splices are an important part of reinforced concrete construction. Conventional lap splicing is widely used, but it often creates reinforcement congestion, increases steel consumption, and makes concreting and bar placement difficult. To overcome these problems, this study developed and evaluated an optimized mechanical rebar coupler as an alternative to conventional lap splices. The proposed coupler was analysed using finite element modelling in ANSYS under different tensile loading conditions. Coupler lengths of 80 mm, 100 mm, 120 mm, and 150 mm were studied for 12 mm, 16 mm, and 20 mm diameter reinforcing bars. The behaviour of the coupler was evaluated in terms of equivalent stress, elongation, elastic strain, and tensile strength based on the provisions of ACI 318, IS 16,172, IS 1786, and IS 456. The results showed that increasing the coupler length reduced stress concentration and elastic strain while keeping deformation within allowable limits. Finite element analysis under a tensile load of 10,000 N showed that the stress in the 12 mm reinforcement bar reduced from about 221 MPa for the 80 mm coupler to nearly 200 MPa for the 150 mm coupler. This shows that longer couplers helped distribute the stress more evenly. Experimental tensile testing of the developed coupler specimens gave ultimate tensile strengths of 563.48 MPa, 641.34 MPa, and 643.39 MPa for the 12 mm, 16 mm, and 20 mm reinforcement bars, respectively.These values were about 25%, 32%, and 34% higher than welded splice specimens and much higher than conventional lap splices. The developed coupler also showed better stress distribution, stable deformation behaviour, and reduced reinforcement congestion. Overall, the study shows that the proposed mechanical rebar coupler can be used as an efficient and practical alternative to conventional lap splicing in reinforced concrete construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 9","pages":"4431 - 4462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01729-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforcing bar splices are an important part of reinforced concrete construction. Conventional lap splicing is widely used, but it often creates reinforcement congestion, increases steel consumption, and makes concreting and bar placement difficult. To overcome these problems, this study developed and evaluated an optimized mechanical rebar coupler as an alternative to conventional lap splices. The proposed coupler was analysed using finite element modelling in ANSYS under different tensile loading conditions. Coupler lengths of 80 mm, 100 mm, 120 mm, and 150 mm were studied for 12 mm, 16 mm, and 20 mm diameter reinforcing bars. The behaviour of the coupler was evaluated in terms of equivalent stress, elongation, elastic strain, and tensile strength based on the provisions of ACI 318, IS 16,172, IS 1786, and IS 456. The results showed that increasing the coupler length reduced stress concentration and elastic strain while keeping deformation within allowable limits. Finite element analysis under a tensile load of 10,000 N showed that the stress in the 12 mm reinforcement bar reduced from about 221 MPa for the 80 mm coupler to nearly 200 MPa for the 150 mm coupler. This shows that longer couplers helped distribute the stress more evenly. Experimental tensile testing of the developed coupler specimens gave ultimate tensile strengths of 563.48 MPa, 641.34 MPa, and 643.39 MPa for the 12 mm, 16 mm, and 20 mm reinforcement bars, respectively.These values were about 25%, 32%, and 34% higher than welded splice specimens and much higher than conventional lap splices. The developed coupler also showed better stress distribution, stable deformation behaviour, and reduced reinforcement congestion. Overall, the study shows that the proposed mechanical rebar coupler can be used as an efficient and practical alternative to conventional lap splicing in reinforced concrete construction.

替代传统搭接的新型机械螺纹钢连接件的性能评价与参数优化
钢筋拼接是钢筋混凝土施工的重要组成部分。传统搭接被广泛使用,但它经常造成钢筋堵塞,增加钢材消耗,并使混凝土和钢筋放置困难。为了克服这些问题,本研究开发并评估了一种优化的机械钢筋耦合器,作为传统搭接接头的替代方案。在ANSYS中对所设计的联轴器进行了不同拉伸载荷条件下的有限元建模分析。针对直径为12mm、16mm和20mm的钢筋,研究了80mm、100mm、120mm和150mm的扣件长度。根据ACI 318、IS 16,172、IS 1786和IS 456的规定,用等效应力、伸长率、弹性应变和抗拉强度来评估联轴器的性能。结果表明,增加联轴器长度可以降低应力集中和弹性应变,同时使变形控制在允许范围内。有限元分析表明,在10,000 N的拉伸载荷下,12 mm钢筋的应力从80 mm联轴器的约221 MPa减小到150 mm联轴器的近200 MPa。这表明较长的耦合器有助于更均匀地分配应力。试验结果表明,12 mm、16 mm和20 mm钢筋的极限抗拉强度分别为563.48 MPa、641.34 MPa和643.39 MPa。这些值分别比焊接接头高25%、32%和34%,比传统搭接接头高得多。所开发的联轴器还具有更好的应力分布、稳定的变形行为和减少钢筋堵塞。总的来说,研究表明,所提出的机械钢筋耦合器可以作为钢筋混凝土施工中传统搭接的一种有效和实用的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书