Environmental controls over greenhouse gas dynamics of tropical peatlands of the Central Congo Basin.

IF 4.7
Nicholas Girkin, Alice Johnston, Hayley Curran, Sofie Sjögersten, A Jonay Jovani-Sancho, Yannick Enock Bocko, Pierre Bola, Arnoud Boom, Hannah Cooper, Bart Crezee, Dafydd Egryn Crabtree, Greta Dargie, Ovide Emba Botuli, Joseph Kanyama, Ian Lawson, Yeto Emmanuel Wenina Mampouya, Mackline Mbemba, Vicky Moss-Hayes, Guy Rodrigue Mouanda Niamba, Susan E Page, Kirby Robinson, Christopher H Vane, Corneille E N Ewango, Suspense Ifo, Simon L Lewis
{"title":"Environmental controls over greenhouse gas dynamics of tropical peatlands of the Central Congo Basin.","authors":"Nicholas Girkin, Alice Johnston, Hayley Curran, Sofie Sjögersten, A Jonay Jovani-Sancho, Yannick Enock Bocko, Pierre Bola, Arnoud Boom, Hannah Cooper, Bart Crezee, Dafydd Egryn Crabtree, Greta Dargie, Ovide Emba Botuli, Joseph Kanyama, Ian Lawson, Yeto Emmanuel Wenina Mampouya, Mackline Mbemba, Vicky Moss-Hayes, Guy Rodrigue Mouanda Niamba, Susan E Page, Kirby Robinson, Christopher H Vane, Corneille E N Ewango, Suspense Ifo, Simon L Lewis","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2024.0482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The central Congo Basin hosts the world's largest tropical peatland complex, storing 29.0 Pg of carbon, the equivalent to three years of global CO₂ emissions. These peatlands are significant natural sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O, but the environmental controls on their emissions remain poorly understood. To address this, we collected surface peat samples from six regional landscapes, spanning palm- and hardwood-dominated sites, and incubated them under three hydrological regimes: flooded aerobic, flooded anoxic and mesic (aerobic and no surface water). This allowed us to quantify how hydrology and peat chemistry (carbon, nutrients and organic chemistry) influence GHG dynamics. We observed strong differences in GHG production between vegetation types, and high sensitivity to hydrological change. Using random forest models, we assessed 27 potential drivers of GHG fluxes, identifying distinct controls across GHGs and hydrological regimes. Incubation of deeper peat samples (up to 1.5 m) highlighted that surface layers dominate peat GHG production. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that hydrology, vegetation, nutrients and peat organic chemistry shape regional GHG emissions, driving substantial spatial variability. Changes to peatland hydrology, for example from land use or climate change, could significantly shift GHG balances, with important implications for global climate feedbacks. A French translation of this abstract is available in the supplementary material. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'African tropical peatlands: function, value and vulnerability'.</p>","PeriodicalId":520748,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences","volume":"381 1956","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central Congo Basin hosts the world's largest tropical peatland complex, storing 29.0 Pg of carbon, the equivalent to three years of global CO₂ emissions. These peatlands are significant natural sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O, but the environmental controls on their emissions remain poorly understood. To address this, we collected surface peat samples from six regional landscapes, spanning palm- and hardwood-dominated sites, and incubated them under three hydrological regimes: flooded aerobic, flooded anoxic and mesic (aerobic and no surface water). This allowed us to quantify how hydrology and peat chemistry (carbon, nutrients and organic chemistry) influence GHG dynamics. We observed strong differences in GHG production between vegetation types, and high sensitivity to hydrological change. Using random forest models, we assessed 27 potential drivers of GHG fluxes, identifying distinct controls across GHGs and hydrological regimes. Incubation of deeper peat samples (up to 1.5 m) highlighted that surface layers dominate peat GHG production. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that hydrology, vegetation, nutrients and peat organic chemistry shape regional GHG emissions, driving substantial spatial variability. Changes to peatland hydrology, for example from land use or climate change, could significantly shift GHG balances, with important implications for global climate feedbacks. A French translation of this abstract is available in the supplementary material. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'African tropical peatlands: function, value and vulnerability'.

中刚果盆地热带泥炭地温室气体动态的环境控制。
刚果盆地中部拥有世界上最大的热带泥炭地,储存了29.0 Pg的碳,相当于全球三年的二氧化碳排放量。这些泥炭地是温室气体(ghg)的重要天然来源,包括CO₂,CH₄和N₂O,但对其排放的环境控制仍然知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们从六个区域景观中收集了地表泥炭样本,包括棕榈树和硬木为主的地点,并在三种水文制度下进行培养:淹水好氧、淹水缺氧和中氧(好氧和无地表水)。这使我们能够量化水文和泥炭化学(碳、营养物质和有机化学)如何影响温室气体动力学。不同植被类型的温室气体产量差异较大,对水文变化的敏感性较高。利用随机森林模型,我们评估了温室气体通量的27个潜在驱动因素,确定了温室气体和水文制度之间的不同控制因素。对深层泥炭样品(深达1.5米)的孵化研究表明,表层主导泥炭温室气体的产生。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,水文、植被、营养物质和泥炭有机化学决定了区域温室气体排放,驱动了实质性的空间变异。泥炭地水文的变化,例如由土地利用或气候变化引起的变化,可能显著改变温室气体平衡,对全球气候反馈具有重要影响。该摘要的法文译本可在补充材料中找到。这篇文章是讨论会议“非洲热带泥炭地:功能、价值和脆弱性”的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书