Factors Associated With Time in Therapeutic Range Among Thai Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin: Development of AHfHDP Score.

IF 2
Pitchapong Kositchaiwat, Ubonwan Sapoo, Nutthada Areepium, Krittin Bunditanukul
{"title":"Factors Associated With Time in Therapeutic Range Among Thai Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin: Development of AHfHDP Score.","authors":"Pitchapong Kositchaiwat, Ubonwan Sapoo, Nutthada Areepium, Krittin Bunditanukul","doi":"10.1177/10760296261480894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulation quality with warfarin remains suboptimal. Existing prediction tools for poor international normalized ratio (INR) control, such as the SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> score, perform poorly in this population. Identifying population-specific determinants of time in therapeutic range (TTR) may improve risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with NVAF taking warfarin between 2016 and 2019. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, with a target INR range of 2.0-3.0. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of suboptimal anticoagulation control (TTR <65%). A novel risk score was derived from the regression coefficients and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong 1,322 patients (median age 68 years; 57% female), median TTR was 50.5% (IQR 29.8-69.0), and 70% had TTR <65%. Independent predictors of suboptimal TTR included age ≥65 years, heart failure, hypertension, and drug-drug interactions with warfarin, while prior warfarin use ≥1 year was protective (all P<0.05). These variables were incorporated into the AHfHDP score (range, -2 to 4). The AHfHDP score showed modest discrimination (C-statistic 0.64; 95% CI 0.61-0.67), outperforming SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> (C-statistic, 0.53).ConclusionsWarfarin anticoagulation control in Thai patients with NVAF remains suboptimal. The AHfHDP score demonstrated modest predictive performance and superior discrimination compared to the SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> score. However, its overall predictive ability remained limited, and external validation is required before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":520590,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"32 ","pages":"10760296261480894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296261480894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulation quality with warfarin remains suboptimal. Existing prediction tools for poor international normalized ratio (INR) control, such as the SAMe-TT2R2 score, perform poorly in this population. Identifying population-specific determinants of time in therapeutic range (TTR) may improve risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with NVAF taking warfarin between 2016 and 2019. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, with a target INR range of 2.0-3.0. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of suboptimal anticoagulation control (TTR <65%). A novel risk score was derived from the regression coefficients and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong 1,322 patients (median age 68 years; 57% female), median TTR was 50.5% (IQR 29.8-69.0), and 70% had TTR <65%. Independent predictors of suboptimal TTR included age ≥65 years, heart failure, hypertension, and drug-drug interactions with warfarin, while prior warfarin use ≥1 year was protective (all P<0.05). These variables were incorporated into the AHfHDP score (range, -2 to 4). The AHfHDP score showed modest discrimination (C-statistic 0.64; 95% CI 0.61-0.67), outperforming SAMe-TT2R2 (C-statistic, 0.53).ConclusionsWarfarin anticoagulation control in Thai patients with NVAF remains suboptimal. The AHfHDP score demonstrated modest predictive performance and superior discrimination compared to the SAMe-TT2R2 score. However, its overall predictive ability remained limited, and external validation is required before clinical application.

服用华法林的泰国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者治疗范围内与时间相关的因素:AHfHDP评分的发展
背景:在泰国的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,华法林的抗凝质量仍然不够理想。现有的国际标准化比率(INR)控制较差的预测工具,如SAMe-TT2R2评分,在这一人群中表现不佳。确定治疗范围内时间(TTR)的人群特异性决定因素可以改善风险分层并为临床决策提供信息。方法对2016 - 2019年服用华法林的成年非瓣膜性房颤患者进行单中心、回顾性队列研究。TTR采用Rosendaal法计算,目标INR范围为2.0-3.0。采用Logistic回归分析确定抗凝控制次优的独立预测因子(TTR 2R2 (c -统计量,0.53)。结论swarfarin在泰国非瓣膜性房颤患者中的抗凝控制效果仍不理想。AHfHDP评分表现出适度的预测性能,与相同的tt2r2评分相比具有更好的辨别能力。然而,其整体预测能力仍然有限,在临床应用前需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书