Factors Associated With Time in Therapeutic Range Among Thai Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin: Development of AHfHDP Score.
{"title":"Factors Associated With Time in Therapeutic Range Among Thai Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin: Development of AHfHDP Score.","authors":"Pitchapong Kositchaiwat, Ubonwan Sapoo, Nutthada Areepium, Krittin Bunditanukul","doi":"10.1177/10760296261480894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulation quality with warfarin remains suboptimal. Existing prediction tools for poor international normalized ratio (INR) control, such as the SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> score, perform poorly in this population. Identifying population-specific determinants of time in therapeutic range (TTR) may improve risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with NVAF taking warfarin between 2016 and 2019. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, with a target INR range of 2.0-3.0. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of suboptimal anticoagulation control (TTR <65%). A novel risk score was derived from the regression coefficients and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong 1,322 patients (median age 68 years; 57% female), median TTR was 50.5% (IQR 29.8-69.0), and 70% had TTR <65%. Independent predictors of suboptimal TTR included age ≥65 years, heart failure, hypertension, and drug-drug interactions with warfarin, while prior warfarin use ≥1 year was protective (all P<0.05). These variables were incorporated into the AHfHDP score (range, -2 to 4). The AHfHDP score showed modest discrimination (C-statistic 0.64; 95% CI 0.61-0.67), outperforming SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> (C-statistic, 0.53).ConclusionsWarfarin anticoagulation control in Thai patients with NVAF remains suboptimal. The AHfHDP score demonstrated modest predictive performance and superior discrimination compared to the SAMe-TT<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub> score. However, its overall predictive ability remained limited, and external validation is required before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":520590,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"32 ","pages":"10760296261480894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296261480894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundIn Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulation quality with warfarin remains suboptimal. Existing prediction tools for poor international normalized ratio (INR) control, such as the SAMe-TT2R2 score, perform poorly in this population. Identifying population-specific determinants of time in therapeutic range (TTR) may improve risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with NVAF taking warfarin between 2016 and 2019. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, with a target INR range of 2.0-3.0. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of suboptimal anticoagulation control (TTR <65%). A novel risk score was derived from the regression coefficients and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong 1,322 patients (median age 68 years; 57% female), median TTR was 50.5% (IQR 29.8-69.0), and 70% had TTR <65%. Independent predictors of suboptimal TTR included age ≥65 years, heart failure, hypertension, and drug-drug interactions with warfarin, while prior warfarin use ≥1 year was protective (all P<0.05). These variables were incorporated into the AHfHDP score (range, -2 to 4). The AHfHDP score showed modest discrimination (C-statistic 0.64; 95% CI 0.61-0.67), outperforming SAMe-TT2R2 (C-statistic, 0.53).ConclusionsWarfarin anticoagulation control in Thai patients with NVAF remains suboptimal. The AHfHDP score demonstrated modest predictive performance and superior discrimination compared to the SAMe-TT2R2 score. However, its overall predictive ability remained limited, and external validation is required before clinical application.