Health care access, affordability, and satisfaction following enrollment in Medicare Advantage.

IF 4.1
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2026-08-11 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxag202
Andrew S Oseran, Bassel M Shanab, Archana Tale, Yunzhe Qian, Rishi K Wadhera
{"title":"Health care access, affordability, and satisfaction following enrollment in Medicare Advantage.","authors":"Andrew S Oseran, Bassel M Shanab, Archana Tale, Yunzhe Qian, Rishi K Wadhera","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is growing rapidly, yet less is known about how these plans impact health care access, affordability, and satisfaction for adults newly entering Medicare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Event study, difference-in-differences analysis comparing longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes among adults newly enrolled in MA (vs traditional Medicare [TM]) in the Health and Retirement Study (2010-2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 4247 adults who newly enrolled in Medicare between 65 and 67 years of age (34.2% MA; 65.8% TM). Following Medicare enrollment, health care access improved similarly in MA and TM, with no differential change between groups. However, MA enrollees experienced a greater reduction in the proportion of individuals reporting trouble affording medical care (difference-in-differences [DiD] estimate -5.3pp [95% CI, -9.7 to -0.9]). Additionally, the percentage of adults satisfied with their care increased for both groups; however, these gains were larger among MA enrollees and increased over time (DiD +13.3pp [95% CI, 7.9-18.6]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this national, longitudinal study of adults entering Medicare, we found that enrollment in MA was associated with greater improvements in the affordability of care and higher satisfaction compared with enrollment in TM, without meaningful differences in health care access.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 8","pages":"qxag202"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13492085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is growing rapidly, yet less is known about how these plans impact health care access, affordability, and satisfaction for adults newly entering Medicare.

Methods: Event study, difference-in-differences analysis comparing longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes among adults newly enrolled in MA (vs traditional Medicare [TM]) in the Health and Retirement Study (2010-2022).

Results: There were 4247 adults who newly enrolled in Medicare between 65 and 67 years of age (34.2% MA; 65.8% TM). Following Medicare enrollment, health care access improved similarly in MA and TM, with no differential change between groups. However, MA enrollees experienced a greater reduction in the proportion of individuals reporting trouble affording medical care (difference-in-differences [DiD] estimate -5.3pp [95% CI, -9.7 to -0.9]). Additionally, the percentage of adults satisfied with their care increased for both groups; however, these gains were larger among MA enrollees and increased over time (DiD +13.3pp [95% CI, 7.9-18.6]).

Conclusion: In this national, longitudinal study of adults entering Medicare, we found that enrollment in MA was associated with greater improvements in the affordability of care and higher satisfaction compared with enrollment in TM, without meaningful differences in health care access.

医疗保健的可及性、可负担性和满意度。
简介:医疗保险优势(MA)的注册人数正在迅速增长,但人们对这些计划如何影响医疗保健的获取、负担能力和新加入医疗保险的成年人的满意度知之甚少。方法:事件研究,差异中差异分析,比较2010-2022年健康与退休研究中新加入MA的成年人(与传统医疗保险[TM])患者报告结果的纵向变化。结果:65 ~ 67岁的新入组成人4247人(34.2% MA, 65.8% TM)。在医疗保险登记后,MA和TM的医疗保健可及性得到了类似的改善,两组之间没有差异变化。然而,MA入组者报告负担医疗费用困难的个体比例有更大的下降(差异中的差异[DiD]估计为-5.3pp [95% CI, -9.7至-0.9])。此外,两组成年人对他们的护理满意的百分比都有所增加;然而,这些获益在MA患者中更大,并且随着时间的推移而增加(DiD +13.3pp [95% CI, 7.9-18.6])。结论:在这项针对进入医疗保险的成年人的全国性纵向研究中,我们发现,与入组TM相比,入组MA与更大的医疗负担能力改善和更高的满意度相关,在医疗保健可及性方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书