Implementing Group Clinical Supervision for Mental Health Nurses in Acute Adult Inpatient Wards. A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

IF 3.3
Whitney Johnson, Michael Kelly, Bridget Poole, Jas Ulger, Liza Hopkins
{"title":"Implementing Group Clinical Supervision for Mental Health Nurses in Acute Adult Inpatient Wards. A Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Whitney Johnson, Michael Kelly, Bridget Poole, Jas Ulger, Liza Hopkins","doi":"10.1111/inm.70336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical supervision for health care workers is well established across many disciplines; however, supervision for nurses has proven more difficult to implement and sustain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the experience of establishing regular, ongoing group clinical supervision for mental health nurses in two acute adult inpatient wards. The study took a qualitative descriptive approach to data collection, gathering and triangulating data from nurses who took part in the supervision sessions, as well as supervision facilitators and ward managers. Data were collected through a brief anonymous online survey with open text options (n = 21) followed up with one-on-one semi-structured interviews (n = 10). Interview questions covered issues such as the experience of taking part in group supervision sessions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, enabling environmental factors, and ways to overcome challenges and build psychological safety for participants as well as a sustainable program. Quantitative survey data were analysed using simple counting, while qualitative data from open-ended survey responses and interviews were coded independently by the authors using an inductive grounded theory approach to identify emergent themes. The study found that successful implementation of group supervision required careful attention to the design and development of the program prior to and during establishment, with support from all levels of management as well as addressing administrative and logistic requirements. Sustainability was ensured through enabling attendance for all staff working the relevant shift, as well as by ensuring skilled facilitation of the sessions. Broader cultural change ensured the meaning, relevance, and value of supervision for nurses was built over time. In addition, a positive experience during the group supervision sessions meant that nurses felt more confident and better supported in their care of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":"35 4","pages":"e70336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13498433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mental health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical supervision for health care workers is well established across many disciplines; however, supervision for nurses has proven more difficult to implement and sustain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the experience of establishing regular, ongoing group clinical supervision for mental health nurses in two acute adult inpatient wards. The study took a qualitative descriptive approach to data collection, gathering and triangulating data from nurses who took part in the supervision sessions, as well as supervision facilitators and ward managers. Data were collected through a brief anonymous online survey with open text options (n = 21) followed up with one-on-one semi-structured interviews (n = 10). Interview questions covered issues such as the experience of taking part in group supervision sessions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, enabling environmental factors, and ways to overcome challenges and build psychological safety for participants as well as a sustainable program. Quantitative survey data were analysed using simple counting, while qualitative data from open-ended survey responses and interviews were coded independently by the authors using an inductive grounded theory approach to identify emergent themes. The study found that successful implementation of group supervision required careful attention to the design and development of the program prior to and during establishment, with support from all levels of management as well as addressing administrative and logistic requirements. Sustainability was ensured through enabling attendance for all staff working the relevant shift, as well as by ensuring skilled facilitation of the sessions. Broader cultural change ensured the meaning, relevance, and value of supervision for nurses was built over time. In addition, a positive experience during the group supervision sessions meant that nurses felt more confident and better supported in their care of patients.

成人急症住院病房精神卫生护士临床小组督导的实施。定性描述性研究。
对卫生保健工作者的临床监督在许多学科中都得到了很好的建立;然而,事实证明,对护士的监督更难实施和维持。摘要本研究旨在探讨在两间急症成人住院病房对心理健康护士进行定期、持续的小组临床督导的经验。该研究采用定性描述性方法收集数据,收集和三角测量参与监督会议的护士,以及监督协调员和病房管理员的数据。数据通过简短的匿名在线调查(n = 21)和一对一的半结构化访谈(n = 10)收集。采访问题包括参加小组监督会议的经验、实施的障碍和促进因素、有利的环境因素、克服挑战的方法、为参与者建立心理安全以及可持续的项目。定量调查数据使用简单的计数进行分析,而来自开放式调查回应和访谈的定性数据由作者使用归纳基础理论方法独立编码,以确定紧急主题。研究发现,小组监督的成功实施需要在计划建立之前和建立期间仔细关注计划的设计和发展,并得到各级管理人员的支持,并解决行政和后勤要求。通过使所有在相关班次工作的工作人员都能出席会议,以及确保熟练地为会议提供便利,确保了可持续性。随着时间的推移,更广泛的文化变革确保了护士监督的意义、相关性和价值。此外,在小组监督会议期间的积极体验意味着护士在护理患者时感到更自信和更好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书