Revision of failed Rubis II prostheses with a dual-mobility Touch implant.

IF 1
Alix Dessirier, Oussama Abcha, Emmanuel Mimran, Mirdad Moughabghab, Nicolas Lebeau
{"title":"Revision of failed Rubis II prostheses with a dual-mobility Touch implant.","authors":"Alix Dessirier, Oussama Abcha, Emmanuel Mimran, Mirdad Moughabghab, Nicolas Lebeau","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2026.102763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is the most prevalent upper limb arthropathy. Total joint arthroplasty has established itself as a trapezium-preserving alternative to trapeziectomy, but single-mobility implants carry a significant risk of dislocation. When revision is required, conversion to a dual-mobility implant is an appealing option, yet no published series has specifically evaluated the outcomes of this procedure. This study aimed to assess implant survival, functional outcomes and complications after revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion from the single-mobility Rubis II prosthesis to the dual-mobility Touch prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at the Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Quentin, including all consecutive patients who underwent revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion to the Touch prosthesis between 2019 and 2025, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores; pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Complications and reoperations were recorded for all 30 cases. Implant survival without reoperation was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cases were included. Functional analysis was performed in 18 cases with available functional follow-up data (four excluded after secondary prosthesis removal, eight with missing data). Mean QuickDASH was 30.3 ± 26.2 and mean PRWE was 26.5 ± 23.5. VAS at rest was low (mean 0.9, median 0). Complications occurred in six cases (20.0%), comprising five mechanical complications (16.7%) and one persistent pain without reoperation (3.3%). Reoperation was required in five cases (16.7%), of which three occurred within four months. Kaplan-Meier survival without reoperation was 86.7% (95% CI: 68.3-94.8 %) at one year and 83.3% (95% CI: 64.5-92.7 %) at two years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion from a single-mobility Rubis II prosthesis to a dual-mobility Touch prosthesis is a feasible salvage option, achieving satisfactory functional outcomes, near-complete rest pain relief, and an implant survival without reoperation of 83.3% at two years.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV (retrospective observational study).</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102763"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2026.102763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is the most prevalent upper limb arthropathy. Total joint arthroplasty has established itself as a trapezium-preserving alternative to trapeziectomy, but single-mobility implants carry a significant risk of dislocation. When revision is required, conversion to a dual-mobility implant is an appealing option, yet no published series has specifically evaluated the outcomes of this procedure. This study aimed to assess implant survival, functional outcomes and complications after revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion from the single-mobility Rubis II prosthesis to the dual-mobility Touch prosthesis.

Material and methods: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at the Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Quentin, including all consecutive patients who underwent revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion to the Touch prosthesis between 2019 and 2025, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores; pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Complications and reoperations were recorded for all 30 cases. Implant survival without reoperation was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Thirty cases were included. Functional analysis was performed in 18 cases with available functional follow-up data (four excluded after secondary prosthesis removal, eight with missing data). Mean QuickDASH was 30.3 ± 26.2 and mean PRWE was 26.5 ± 23.5. VAS at rest was low (mean 0.9, median 0). Complications occurred in six cases (20.0%), comprising five mechanical complications (16.7%) and one persistent pain without reoperation (3.3%). Reoperation was required in five cases (16.7%), of which three occurred within four months. Kaplan-Meier survival without reoperation was 86.7% (95% CI: 68.3-94.8 %) at one year and 83.3% (95% CI: 64.5-92.7 %) at two years.

Conclusion: Revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty by conversion from a single-mobility Rubis II prosthesis to a dual-mobility Touch prosthesis is a feasible salvage option, achieving satisfactory functional outcomes, near-complete rest pain relief, and an implant survival without reoperation of 83.3% at two years.

Level of evidence: IV (retrospective observational study).

用双活动触觉植入物修复失败的Rubis II假体。
目的:梯形骨关节炎是最常见的上肢关节病。全关节置换术已成为保留梯形的替代方法,但单活动植入物有明显的脱位风险。当需要翻修时,转换为双活动种植体是一个很有吸引力的选择,但没有发表的系列文章专门评估该手术的结果。本研究旨在评估由单活动Rubis II假体转换为双活动Touch假体的改良型斜骨腕关节置换术后的假体存活、功能结果和并发症。材料和方法:在圣昆廷医院中心进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,包括所有在2019年至2025年期间连续接受Touch假体置换翻修的患者,随访时间至少为6个月。使用QuickDASH和患者腕部评估(PRWE)评分评估功能结局;采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。30例均有并发症及再手术记录。使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计无再次手术的种植体存活。结果:共纳入30例。对18例有功能随访资料的患者进行功能分析(其中4例在二次假体移除后被排除,8例数据缺失)。平均QuickDASH为30.3 +/- 26.2,平均PRWE为26.5 +/- 23.5。静止时VAS较低(平均0.9,中位数0)。并发症6例(20.0%),其中机械性并发症5例(16.7%),持续性疼痛1例(3.3%)。5例(16.7%)需要再次手术,其中3例在4个月内发生。无再手术的Kaplan-Meier生存率1年为86.7% (95% CI: 68.3-94.8%), 2年为83.3% (95% CI: 64.5-92.7%)。结论:将单活动Rubis II假体转化为双活动Touch假体是一种可行的修复选择,可获得满意的功能结果,几乎完全缓解休息疼痛,两年内种植体存活率为83.3%,无需再次手术。证据水平:IV(回顾性观察性研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书