Recovery-Oriented Care Planning in Mental Healthcare Services: A Combined Concept Analysis and Scoping Review.

IF 3.3
Natthapon Inta, Prapan Phetlerthirunkul, Jirada Kaewchuchuen, Chonmanan Khanthavudh, Wilailak Sakharang
{"title":"Recovery-Oriented Care Planning in Mental Healthcare Services: A Combined Concept Analysis and Scoping Review.","authors":"Natthapon Inta, Prapan Phetlerthirunkul, Jirada Kaewchuchuen, Chonmanan Khanthavudh, Wilailak Sakharang","doi":"10.1111/inm.70337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recovery-oriented care planning is increasingly promoted within international mental health policy and practice; however, the concept remains inconsistently defined and operationalised across the literature. This study aimed to clarify the concept of recovery-oriented care planning using Walker and Avant's concept analysis method alongside a scoping review. Literature was systematically searched across six electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest One Academic and Scopus. Data were analysed across 28 included papers to identify antecedents, defining attributes, consequences, empirical referents and model cases of recovery-oriented care planning. The findings demonstrated that recovery-oriented care planning emerged from broader philosophical and policy shifts away from paternalistic and symptom-focused models towards collaborative, person-centred and recovery-oriented mental healthcare. Defining attributes included collaboration and shared decision-making, strengths-based and person-centred approaches, recovery-focused goal setting, empowering therapeutic relationships and viewing care planning as an ongoing and dynamic process. Recovery-oriented care planning was associated with increased empowerment, hope, autonomy, therapeutic alliance, self-management and more holistic and individualised care. Empirical referents included recovery-oriented care planning tools, collaborative planning processes and recovery-focused outcome and fidelity measures. This concept analysis provides greater conceptual clarity regarding recovery-oriented care planning and may support future research, education, policy development and implementation of recovery-oriented mental healthcare practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":"35 4","pages":"e70337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mental health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recovery-oriented care planning is increasingly promoted within international mental health policy and practice; however, the concept remains inconsistently defined and operationalised across the literature. This study aimed to clarify the concept of recovery-oriented care planning using Walker and Avant's concept analysis method alongside a scoping review. Literature was systematically searched across six electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest One Academic and Scopus. Data were analysed across 28 included papers to identify antecedents, defining attributes, consequences, empirical referents and model cases of recovery-oriented care planning. The findings demonstrated that recovery-oriented care planning emerged from broader philosophical and policy shifts away from paternalistic and symptom-focused models towards collaborative, person-centred and recovery-oriented mental healthcare. Defining attributes included collaboration and shared decision-making, strengths-based and person-centred approaches, recovery-focused goal setting, empowering therapeutic relationships and viewing care planning as an ongoing and dynamic process. Recovery-oriented care planning was associated with increased empowerment, hope, autonomy, therapeutic alliance, self-management and more holistic and individualised care. Empirical referents included recovery-oriented care planning tools, collaborative planning processes and recovery-focused outcome and fidelity measures. This concept analysis provides greater conceptual clarity regarding recovery-oriented care planning and may support future research, education, policy development and implementation of recovery-oriented mental healthcare practices.

以康复为导向的精神卫生服务照护计划:概念分析与范围检讨相结合。
国际精神卫生政策和实践日益促进以康复为导向的护理规划;然而,在整个文献中,这个概念的定义和操作仍然不一致。本研究旨在利用Walker和Avant的概念分析方法以及范围回顾来阐明康复导向护理计划的概念。文献系统地检索了六个电子数据库:MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest One Academic和Scopus。对纳入的28篇论文的数据进行分析,以确定以康复为导向的护理计划的前因由、定义属性、后果、经验参考和模型案例。研究结果表明,以康复为导向的护理计划源于更广泛的哲学和政策转变,从家长式和以症状为中心的模式转向协作式、以人为中心和以康复为导向的精神卫生保健。定义属性包括协作和共同决策、基于优势和以人为本的方法、以康复为中心的目标设定、增强治疗关系以及将护理计划视为一个持续和动态的过程。以康复为导向的护理计划与增强的权力、希望、自主性、治疗联盟、自我管理以及更全面和个性化的护理有关。实证参考包括以康复为导向的护理计划工具、协作计划过程和以康复为重点的结果和保真度测量。这一概念分析为面向康复的护理计划提供了更清晰的概念,并可能支持未来的研究、教育、政策制定和实施面向康复的精神保健实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书