Real-World Phenobarbital Use, Treatment Escalation, and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001466
Zeeshan M Rizwan, Kiyan Heybati, Ross Dierkhising, Jacqueline L Stark, Jacob Schwarz, Sara Toufar, Alberto Marquez, Lucrezia Rovati, Ognjen Gajic
{"title":"Real-World Phenobarbital Use, Treatment Escalation, and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Zeeshan M Rizwan, Kiyan Heybati, Ross Dierkhising, Jacqueline L Stark, Jacob Schwarz, Sara Toufar, Alberto Marquez, Lucrezia Rovati, Ognjen Gajic","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Phenobarbital use in ICU alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) may reflect severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation, making multicenter data important to understand its use within ICU practice and its relationship with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate phenobarbital use in real-world ICU AWS as a marker of severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation. We also examined its association with time-to-discharge and safety outcomes compared with nonphenobarbital regimens.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Adults with AWS, defined as Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) score greater than or equal to 10, were included if they received a phenobarbital-based or nonphenobarbital-based regimen in ICUs across a large academic health system from June 30, 2017, to July 1, 2024. Postoperative ICU admissions were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were time to ICU and hospital discharge alive from treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were hypotension, new intubation, and aspiration within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1216 patients, 345 (28.4%) received phenobarbital. Before matching, phenobarbital-treated patients had higher CIWA-Ar, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and pre-ICU benzodiazepine exposure, consistent with more severe or refractory withdrawal. In adjusted time-to-discharge models, phenobarbital use was not significantly associated with time to hospital discharge alive (discharge rate ratio [DRR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12; p = 0.370) or ICU discharge alive (DRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.01; p = 0.057). Hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a contemporary ICU cohort, phenobarbital use reflected treatment escalation in patients with more severe or refractory AWS. After adjustment, time to ICU and hospital discharge alive did not differ significantly, hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. Future studies should define optimal timing, dosing, and patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"8 8","pages":"e1466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Phenobarbital use in ICU alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) may reflect severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation, making multicenter data important to understand its use within ICU practice and its relationship with clinical outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate phenobarbital use in real-world ICU AWS as a marker of severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation. We also examined its association with time-to-discharge and safety outcomes compared with nonphenobarbital regimens.

Design, setting, and participants: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Adults with AWS, defined as Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) score greater than or equal to 10, were included if they received a phenobarbital-based or nonphenobarbital-based regimen in ICUs across a large academic health system from June 30, 2017, to July 1, 2024. Postoperative ICU admissions were excluded.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were time to ICU and hospital discharge alive from treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were hypotension, new intubation, and aspiration within 48 hours.

Results: Of 1216 patients, 345 (28.4%) received phenobarbital. Before matching, phenobarbital-treated patients had higher CIWA-Ar, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and pre-ICU benzodiazepine exposure, consistent with more severe or refractory withdrawal. In adjusted time-to-discharge models, phenobarbital use was not significantly associated with time to hospital discharge alive (discharge rate ratio [DRR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12; p = 0.370) or ICU discharge alive (DRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.01; p = 0.057). Hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital.

Conclusions: In a contemporary ICU cohort, phenobarbital use reflected treatment escalation in patients with more severe or refractory AWS. After adjustment, time to ICU and hospital discharge alive did not differ significantly, hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. Future studies should define optimal timing, dosing, and patient selection.

酒精戒断综合征危重患者实际使用苯巴比妥、治疗升级和临床结果:一项多中心倾向匹配队列研究
重要性:苯巴比妥在ICU酒精戒断综合征(AWS)中的使用可能反映了严重或难治性戒断和治疗升级,因此多中心数据对于了解其在ICU实践中的使用及其与临床结果的关系非常重要。目的:评估苯巴比妥在现实ICU AWS中的使用,作为严重或难治性停药和治疗升级的标志。我们还研究了与非苯巴比妥方案相比,其与出院时间和安全性结果的关系。设计、环境和参与者:多中心回顾性队列研究,采用多重输入和倾向评分匹配。在2017年6月30日至2024年7月1日期间,在大型学术卫生系统的icu中接受以苯巴比妥为基础或非苯巴比妥为基础的治疗方案的成人AWS,定义为临床研究所酒精戒断评估,修订(CIWA-Ar)评分大于或等于10分。排除术后ICU住院。主要结局和措施:主要结局是到ICU的时间和治疗开始后活着出院。安全性结果为48小时内低血压、新插管和误吸。结果:1216例患者中,345例(28.4%)接受了苯巴比妥治疗。配对前,接受苯巴比巴断治疗的患者CIWA-Ar、急性生理和慢性健康评估III以及icu前苯二氮卓暴露较高,与更严重或难治的戒断一致。在调整后的出院时间模型中,苯巴比妥使用与存活出院时间(出院率比[DRR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12; p = 0.370)或存活出院ICU (DRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.01; p = 0.057)无显著相关。低血压和插管相似,苯巴比妥吸入性较低。结论:在当代ICU队列中,苯巴比妥的使用反映了更严重或难治性AWS患者的治疗升级。调整后,入住ICU的时间和活着出院的时间差异无统计学意义,低血压和插管相似,苯巴比妥误吸次数较少。未来的研究应确定最佳的时间、剂量和患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书