Exploring the Impact of Child Opportunity on PICU Utilization and the Role of Public Insurance.

IF 2.9 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001464
Carlie N Myers, Qing Duan, Paula M Magee, Zachary Pitkowsky, Carley L Riley, Andrew F Beck
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Child Opportunity on PICU Utilization and the Role of Public Insurance.","authors":"Carlie N Myers, Qing Duan, Paula M Magee, Zachary Pitkowsky, Carley L Riley, Andrew F Beck","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Public insurance reduces financial barriers to healthcare but may not fully mitigate the influence of neighborhood opportunity on pediatric critical care utilization. We examined the association between neighborhood opportunity and PICU utilization, including costs, and assessed whether public insurance modified these relationships.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-level retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single, free-standing quaternary children's hospital in southwestern Ohio.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 18 years or younger admitted to the PICU between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, residing within the hospital's primary service area.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary outcomes were census tract (CT) level PICU admission rates and median PICU costs. Very low opportunity neighborhoods had the highest PICU admission rates (3.41 vs. 1.76 admissions per 1000 children in very high opportunity neighborhoods; p < 0.001). Overall CT level median PICU costs did not differ by Child Opportunity Index (COI; p = 0.582). Publicly insured children were more likely to reside in very low opportunity neighborhoods (44% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Within very low opportunity neighborhoods, publicly insured children had lower median PICU costs than children with other insurance ($16,693 vs. $22,585; p = 0.008); costs were similar across insurance groups in other COI quintiles. In multivariable analyses, the interaction between insurance status and neighborhood opportunity was not statistically significant (p = 0.099).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children from low opportunity neighborhoods experienced higher PICU admission rates, while neighborhood opportunity and public insurance jointly influenced patterns of PICU resource utilization. Expanding insurance coverage alone is unlikely to eliminate disparities; improving neighborhood conditions and implementing place-based strategies may help mitigate PICU utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"8 8","pages":"e1464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Public insurance reduces financial barriers to healthcare but may not fully mitigate the influence of neighborhood opportunity on pediatric critical care utilization. We examined the association between neighborhood opportunity and PICU utilization, including costs, and assessed whether public insurance modified these relationships.

Design: Population-level retrospective observational study.

Setting: A single, free-standing quaternary children's hospital in southwestern Ohio.

Patients: Children 18 years or younger admitted to the PICU between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, residing within the hospital's primary service area.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Primary outcomes were census tract (CT) level PICU admission rates and median PICU costs. Very low opportunity neighborhoods had the highest PICU admission rates (3.41 vs. 1.76 admissions per 1000 children in very high opportunity neighborhoods; p < 0.001). Overall CT level median PICU costs did not differ by Child Opportunity Index (COI; p = 0.582). Publicly insured children were more likely to reside in very low opportunity neighborhoods (44% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Within very low opportunity neighborhoods, publicly insured children had lower median PICU costs than children with other insurance ($16,693 vs. $22,585; p = 0.008); costs were similar across insurance groups in other COI quintiles. In multivariable analyses, the interaction between insurance status and neighborhood opportunity was not statistically significant (p = 0.099).

Conclusions: Children from low opportunity neighborhoods experienced higher PICU admission rates, while neighborhood opportunity and public insurance jointly influenced patterns of PICU resource utilization. Expanding insurance coverage alone is unlikely to eliminate disparities; improving neighborhood conditions and implementing place-based strategies may help mitigate PICU utilization.

探讨儿童机会对重症监护病房使用的影响及公共保险的作用。
目的:公共保险减少了医疗保健的财务障碍,但可能不能完全减轻邻里机会对儿科重症护理利用的影响。我们研究了社区机会和PICU使用之间的关系,包括成本,并评估了公共保险是否改变了这些关系。设计:人群水平的回顾性观察研究。环境:俄亥俄州西南部一所独立的第四系儿童医院。患者:2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间入住PICU的18岁或以下儿童,居住在医院的主要服务区域内。干预措施:没有。测量方法和主要结果:主要结果是普查区(CT)水平PICU入院率和PICU费用中位数。机会非常低的社区PICU入院率最高(机会非常高的社区每1000名儿童入院率3.41比1.76;p < 0.001)。总体CT水平PICU费用中位数没有因儿童机会指数而异(COI; p = 0.582)。公共保险儿童更有可能居住在机会非常低的社区(44%对10%;p < 0.001)。在机会非常低的社区,公共保险儿童的PICU费用中位数低于其他保险儿童(16,693美元对22,585美元,p = 0.008);其他COI五分之一的保险集团的成本相似。在多变量分析中,保险状况与邻里机会之间的相互作用无统计学意义(p = 0.099)。结论:来自低机会社区的儿童PICU住院率较高,而社区机会和公共保险共同影响PICU资源利用模式。仅仅扩大保险覆盖面不太可能消除差距;改善社区条件和实施基于地方的策略可能有助于减少重症监护病房的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书