Systemic outcomes of anesthesia method in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for retinopathy of prematurity: General vs topical.

Asaad A Al Habsi, Hilal K Al Mandhari, Anuradha S Ganesh, Sana S Al Zuhaibi, Nasra S Al Habsi, Nouf H Al-Farsi
{"title":"Systemic outcomes of anesthesia method in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for retinopathy of prematurity: General <i>vs</i> topical.","authors":"Asaad A Al Habsi, Hilal K Al Mandhari, Anuradha S Ganesh, Sana S Al Zuhaibi, Nasra S Al Habsi, Nouf H Al-Farsi","doi":"10.5409/wjcp.118321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The type of anesthesia needed while performing an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity is not well standardized. In Oman, general anesthesia (GA) remained the first choice by ophthalmologists treating retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) infants at the time of starting the study. Short-term systemic outcome in GA <i>vs</i> topical anesthesia (TA) is the primary outcome of this study.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the short-term systemic outcomes of GA in infants undergoing anti-VEGF injections <i>vs</i> bedside injections under TA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational study with historical comparison. Estimated sample size is 36 (18 in each group), based on the anticipated rate of difference in the outcome between the two cohorts of 50%, type I error (α) probability of 5%, power of 80%, and the allocation ratio of 1:1. The statistical test considered was Fisher's exact test. The calculation was done using the G*Power version 3.1.9.2. Infants were from two main tertiary hospitals in Oman.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 infants with retinopathy of prematurity were enrolled in the study: 18 in the retrospective (GA) cohort and 18 in the prospective (TA) cohort. The Primary outcome-the need for oxygen and/or respiratory support during the 48 hours post-procedure-occurred in 27.8% of the GA cohort, as compared to none of TA cohort (<i>P</i> value = 0.045). Cost and duration of the procedure, including anesthesia, were noted to be higher in the GA group. Surgeons' preference revealed that 70% prefer topical <i>vs</i> 30% general in terms of safety, 75% topical <i>vs</i> 25% general in terms of logistics, and 100% prefer topical in terms of cost and staff efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TA is associated with a reduced need for oxygen and/or respiratory support within 48 hours post-procedure, and better performance in duration, cost, and surgeon preference compared to GA.</p>","PeriodicalId":75338,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","volume":"15 3","pages":"118321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13491099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.118321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The type of anesthesia needed while performing an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity is not well standardized. In Oman, general anesthesia (GA) remained the first choice by ophthalmologists treating retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) infants at the time of starting the study. Short-term systemic outcome in GA vs topical anesthesia (TA) is the primary outcome of this study.

Aim: To analyze the short-term systemic outcomes of GA in infants undergoing anti-VEGF injections vs bedside injections under TA.

Methods: This is an observational study with historical comparison. Estimated sample size is 36 (18 in each group), based on the anticipated rate of difference in the outcome between the two cohorts of 50%, type I error (α) probability of 5%, power of 80%, and the allocation ratio of 1:1. The statistical test considered was Fisher's exact test. The calculation was done using the G*Power version 3.1.9.2. Infants were from two main tertiary hospitals in Oman.

Results: A total of 36 infants with retinopathy of prematurity were enrolled in the study: 18 in the retrospective (GA) cohort and 18 in the prospective (TA) cohort. The Primary outcome-the need for oxygen and/or respiratory support during the 48 hours post-procedure-occurred in 27.8% of the GA cohort, as compared to none of TA cohort (P value = 0.045). Cost and duration of the procedure, including anesthesia, were noted to be higher in the GA group. Surgeons' preference revealed that 70% prefer topical vs 30% general in terms of safety, 75% topical vs 25% general in terms of logistics, and 100% prefer topical in terms of cost and staff efforts.

Conclusion: TA is associated with a reduced need for oxygen and/or respiratory support within 48 hours post-procedure, and better performance in duration, cost, and surgeon preference compared to GA.

麻醉方法抗血管内皮生长因子治疗早产儿视网膜病变的全身结局:全麻vs局部麻。
背景:对患有早产儿视网膜病变的早产儿进行抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射所需的麻醉类型尚未很好地标准化。在阿曼,在研究开始时,全麻(GA)仍然是眼科医生治疗早产儿视网膜病变的首选。GA与表面麻醉(TA)的短期全身转归是本研究的主要转归。目的:分析TA下接受抗vegf注射与床边注射的GA患儿的短期系统结局。方法:这是一项具有历史比较的观察性研究。估计样本量为36个(每组18个),基于两个队列结果的预期差异率为50%,I型误差(α)概率为5%,功率为80%,分配比例为1:1。考虑的统计检验是费雪精确检验。计算使用G*Power版本3.1.9.2完成。婴儿来自阿曼的两家主要三级医院。结果:共有36例早产儿视网膜病变纳入研究:18例为回顾性(GA)队列,18例为前瞻性(TA)队列。主要结果(术后48小时内需要氧气和/或呼吸支持)在GA组中出现了27.8%,而TA组中没有出现(P值= 0.045)。包括麻醉在内的手术费用和持续时间在GA组中较高。外科医生的偏好显示,在安全性方面,70%的人选择局部手术,30%的人选择全科手术;在后勤方面,75%的人选择局部手术,25%的人选择全科手术;在成本和员工努力方面,100%的人选择局部手术。结论:TA与术后48小时内氧气和/或呼吸支持需求减少有关,与GA相比,TA在持续时间、成本和外科医生偏好方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书