Access to assistive technology in Africa: findings from evidence-informed deliberative dialogues on trade and fiscal policies.

IF 2.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2026.1866962
Emiliana Maria Grando Gaiotto, Mariana Gabriel, Magali Favaretto Prieto Fernandes, Odara Gonzaga de Andrade, Natália Hedlund Jardim, Vinicius Delgado Ramos, Nathan Mendes Souza, Bruno Guedes Alcoforado Aguiar
{"title":"Access to assistive technology in Africa: findings from evidence-informed deliberative dialogues on trade and fiscal policies.","authors":"Emiliana Maria Grando Gaiotto, Mariana Gabriel, Magali Favaretto Prieto Fernandes, Odara Gonzaga de Andrade, Natália Hedlund Jardim, Vinicius Delgado Ramos, Nathan Mendes Souza, Bruno Guedes Alcoforado Aguiar","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2026.1866962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to assistive technology remains unequal in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where high costs, dependence on imports, and fiscal and trade barriers can limit availability and affordability. This article aimed to present and analyze deliberative dialogues conducted with participants from Mozambique, Chad, Egypt, and Kenya, informed by an evidence synthesis on reducing tariffs and taxes on assistive technology. Three multilingual deliberative dialogues were conducted between August and October 2025, involving 35 participants from different stakeholder groups. The dialogues were used as a knowledge translation strategy to contextualize scientific evidence through structured discussions among different stakeholders. Representatives from the Republic of the Congo were invited but did not participate. Transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis based on Bardin's approach and organized according to the domains of the SUPPORT tools. The findings revealed common challenges, including high costs, dependence on imports, weaknesses in the implementation of tax exemptions, limitations in local production, territorial inequalities, shortages of specialized professionals, and difficulties in coordination across sectors and institutions. Country-specific issues related to rural access, governance, territorial inequalities, device acceptability, and policy implementation were also identified. The options discussed included fiscal and tariff reforms, strengthening local production, international cooperation, and awareness campaigns. The deliberative dialogues enabled the contextualization of evidence across different national settings and demonstrated that expanding equitable access to assistive technology requires combined strategies adapted to the specific characteristics of each context.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"7 ","pages":"1866962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13486173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1866962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to assistive technology remains unequal in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where high costs, dependence on imports, and fiscal and trade barriers can limit availability and affordability. This article aimed to present and analyze deliberative dialogues conducted with participants from Mozambique, Chad, Egypt, and Kenya, informed by an evidence synthesis on reducing tariffs and taxes on assistive technology. Three multilingual deliberative dialogues were conducted between August and October 2025, involving 35 participants from different stakeholder groups. The dialogues were used as a knowledge translation strategy to contextualize scientific evidence through structured discussions among different stakeholders. Representatives from the Republic of the Congo were invited but did not participate. Transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis based on Bardin's approach and organized according to the domains of the SUPPORT tools. The findings revealed common challenges, including high costs, dependence on imports, weaknesses in the implementation of tax exemptions, limitations in local production, territorial inequalities, shortages of specialized professionals, and difficulties in coordination across sectors and institutions. Country-specific issues related to rural access, governance, territorial inequalities, device acceptability, and policy implementation were also identified. The options discussed included fiscal and tariff reforms, strengthening local production, international cooperation, and awareness campaigns. The deliberative dialogues enabled the contextualization of evidence across different national settings and demonstrated that expanding equitable access to assistive technology requires combined strategies adapted to the specific characteristics of each context.

非洲获得辅助技术:基于证据的贸易和财政政策审议对话的结果。
在许多国家,特别是在低收入和中等收入环境中,获得辅助技术的机会仍然不平等,在这些国家,高昂的成本、对进口的依赖以及财政和贸易壁垒可能限制可得性和可负担性。本文旨在介绍和分析与来自莫桑比克、乍得、埃及和肯尼亚的参与者进行的审议对话,并根据有关降低辅助技术关税和税收的证据综合。2025年8月至10月期间进行了三次多语种审议对话,来自不同利益攸关方群体的35名与会者参加了对话。对话被用作一种知识翻译策略,通过不同利益相关者之间的结构化讨论将科学证据置于语境中。刚果共和国的代表受到邀请,但没有参加。根据Bardin的方法进行主题内容分析,并根据SUPPORT工具的领域进行组织。调查结果揭示了共同的挑战,包括高成本、依赖进口、在实施免税方面的弱点、当地生产的限制、地域不平等、专业人员的短缺以及跨部门和机构协调的困难。还确定了与农村获取、治理、领土不平等、设备可接受性和政策实施有关的具体国家问题。讨论的选项包括财政和关税改革、加强当地生产、国际合作和提高认识运动。审议性对话使不同国家背景下的证据具有背景性,并表明扩大对辅助技术的公平获取需要适应每种情况具体特点的综合战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书