Assessing the reliability and validity for metabolic syndrome diagnosis using point-of-care analyzers in a mobile setup - a pilot study.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sanne Houtenbos, Anne Schraplau, Pia-Maria Wippert, Michael Rapp, Heinz Völler, Klaus Bonaventura, Frank Mayer
{"title":"Assessing the reliability and validity for metabolic syndrome diagnosis using point-of-care analyzers in a mobile setup - a pilot study.","authors":"Sanne Houtenbos, Anne Schraplau, Pia-Maria Wippert, Michael Rapp, Heinz Völler, Klaus Bonaventura, Frank Mayer","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03502-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by having three or more of these risk factors: increased blood glucose (Glc), serum triglycerides (TG), blood pressure (BP), waist circumference (WC), and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Mobile diagnostics using point-of-care (POC) blood analyzers could help identify individuals at risk. This pilot study assessed reliability and validity of MetS risk factor analysis using POC analyzers in a mobile examination unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty participants (52 ± 7y; 170 ± 10 cm; 80 ± 19 kg, m/f: 21/29) were included for analysis. The mobile examination unit was equipped with different POC analyzers (Alere, LABGEO, CardioChek for Glc, HDL, TG; Quo-Test-A1C Testkit for HbA1c'). Agreement compared to a reference laboratory (RefLab) was analyzed by Bland-Altman (bias, Limits of Agreement (LoA)), ICC, SEM and McNemar's test. Test-retest analysis was assessed on two different days (max. two weeks apart) using Spearman's rho, ICC, test-retest variability (TRV%) and McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the smallest bias and low number of missing values (Glc: -5 [LoA - 25 to 6] mg/dl; TG: 8 [LoA - 58 to 30] mg/dl; HDL: -2 [LoA - 14 to 9] mg/dl), and the highest agreement in MetS diagnosis compared to the results of RefLab, the Alere POC device was chosen. Test-retest reliability (n = 16) for MetS risk factors and HbA1c measured in the mobile setup ranged from poor to excellent with low TRV (0.9-5.8%). Risk factor classification and MetS diagnosis did not differ between measurement days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mobile setup using the Alere POC analyzer could be used as a valid mobile screening method for MetS to ensure early detection of risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03502-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by having three or more of these risk factors: increased blood glucose (Glc), serum triglycerides (TG), blood pressure (BP), waist circumference (WC), and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Mobile diagnostics using point-of-care (POC) blood analyzers could help identify individuals at risk. This pilot study assessed reliability and validity of MetS risk factor analysis using POC analyzers in a mobile examination unit.

Methods: Fifty participants (52 ± 7y; 170 ± 10 cm; 80 ± 19 kg, m/f: 21/29) were included for analysis. The mobile examination unit was equipped with different POC analyzers (Alere, LABGEO, CardioChek for Glc, HDL, TG; Quo-Test-A1C Testkit for HbA1c'). Agreement compared to a reference laboratory (RefLab) was analyzed by Bland-Altman (bias, Limits of Agreement (LoA)), ICC, SEM and McNemar's test. Test-retest analysis was assessed on two different days (max. two weeks apart) using Spearman's rho, ICC, test-retest variability (TRV%) and McNemar's test.

Results: Based on the smallest bias and low number of missing values (Glc: -5 [LoA - 25 to 6] mg/dl; TG: 8 [LoA - 58 to 30] mg/dl; HDL: -2 [LoA - 14 to 9] mg/dl), and the highest agreement in MetS diagnosis compared to the results of RefLab, the Alere POC device was chosen. Test-retest reliability (n = 16) for MetS risk factors and HbA1c measured in the mobile setup ranged from poor to excellent with low TRV (0.9-5.8%). Risk factor classification and MetS diagnosis did not differ between measurement days.

Conclusions: A mobile setup using the Alere POC analyzer could be used as a valid mobile screening method for MetS to ensure early detection of risk factors.

评估代谢综合征诊断的可靠性和有效性使用点护理分析仪在移动设置-一个试点研究。
背景:代谢综合征(MetS)的特征是具有以下三个或更多的危险因素:血糖(Glc)升高、血清甘油三酯(TG)、血压(BP)、腰围(WC)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)降低。使用即时血液分析仪的移动诊断可以帮助识别有风险的个体。本初步研究评估了在移动检查装置中使用POC分析仪进行MetS风险因素分析的可靠性和有效性。方法:纳入50例受试者(52±7y; 170±10cm; 80±19kg, m/f: 21/29)进行分析。移动检测单元配备了不同的POC分析仪(Alere、LABGEO、CardioChek用于Glc、HDL、TG; quoo - test - a1c Testkit用于HbA1c)。与参考实验室(RefLab)相比,一致性通过Bland-Altman(偏倚、一致性限(LoA))、ICC、SEM和McNemar检验进行分析。测试-重测分析在两个不同的天进行评估。使用Spearman的rho, ICC,测试-重测试变异性(TRV%)和McNemar的测试。结果:基于最小偏差和低缺失值(Glc: -5 [LoA - 25 ~ 6] mg/dl; TG: 8 [LoA - 58 ~ 30] mg/dl; HDL: -2 [LoA - 14 ~ 9] mg/dl),以及与refab结果相比,MetS诊断一致性最高,选择了Alere POC装置。在移动装置中测量的met危险因素和HbA1c的重测信度(n = 16)从差到优,TRV较低(0.9-5.8%)。危险因素分类和MetS诊断在测量日之间没有差异。结论:使用Alere POC分析仪的移动装置可作为一种有效的MetS移动筛查方法,确保早期发现危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书