Risky business on TikTok: Content analysis of hazardous challenges among youth.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Abby Shah, Aleezay Khan, Alexander Schafer, Abriel Reister, Jared Bengston, Nour Rammal, Nicholas Mulder, Coby Fan, Jeffrey S Jones
{"title":"Risky business on TikTok: Content analysis of hazardous challenges among youth.","authors":"Abby Shah, Aleezay Khan, Alexander Schafer, Abriel Reister, Jared Bengston, Nour Rammal, Nicholas Mulder, Coby Fan, Jeffrey S Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2026.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>TikTok is a major platform for hazardous user-generated content involving adolescents and young adults. Hazardous videos extend beyond named challenges to include stunts, dares, and copycat behaviors that may encourage imitation through algorithmic promotion and peer engagement. This study characterized hazardous TikTok videos, identified their mechanisms and clinical consequences, explored why adolescents and young adults engage with them, and examined the social network and algorithmic features that accelerate their spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive qualitative content analysis examined public TikTok videos depicting potentially hazardous behaviors among adolescents and young adults. Videos were identified through direct TikTok searches and supplemented by media, regulatory, and toxicology sources. They were then archived, transcribed, and coded using a standardized abstraction form. Qualitative thematic analysis examined motives for participation and dissemination mechanisms, while physician review assessed medical risk and misinformation or disinformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine videos met inclusion criteria; 55 (79.7%) addressed highly prevalent youth challenges and had more than 30,000 views. Twenty-eight videos (40.6%) were associated with challenge types with documented fatalities, and all identified behaviors were deemed medically dangerous. Medical misinformation or disinformation was present in 62 of 69 videos (90.0%). Dissemination was facilitated by recommendation-feed amplification, shared audiovisual templates, hashtag aggregation, social proof, behavioral reinforcement, and moderation evasion through re-uploads, altered hashtags, or coded language. Interrater reliability was substantial (Kappa = 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hazardous TikTok videos are widely disseminated, medically serious, and shaped by misinformation, peer influence, and algorithmic amplification. These findings are relevant to clinicians and public health professionals seeking to recognize, document, and prevent social media-related injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2026.08.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: TikTok is a major platform for hazardous user-generated content involving adolescents and young adults. Hazardous videos extend beyond named challenges to include stunts, dares, and copycat behaviors that may encourage imitation through algorithmic promotion and peer engagement. This study characterized hazardous TikTok videos, identified their mechanisms and clinical consequences, explored why adolescents and young adults engage with them, and examined the social network and algorithmic features that accelerate their spread.

Methods: This descriptive qualitative content analysis examined public TikTok videos depicting potentially hazardous behaviors among adolescents and young adults. Videos were identified through direct TikTok searches and supplemented by media, regulatory, and toxicology sources. They were then archived, transcribed, and coded using a standardized abstraction form. Qualitative thematic analysis examined motives for participation and dissemination mechanisms, while physician review assessed medical risk and misinformation or disinformation.

Results: Sixty-nine videos met inclusion criteria; 55 (79.7%) addressed highly prevalent youth challenges and had more than 30,000 views. Twenty-eight videos (40.6%) were associated with challenge types with documented fatalities, and all identified behaviors were deemed medically dangerous. Medical misinformation or disinformation was present in 62 of 69 videos (90.0%). Dissemination was facilitated by recommendation-feed amplification, shared audiovisual templates, hashtag aggregation, social proof, behavioral reinforcement, and moderation evasion through re-uploads, altered hashtags, or coded language. Interrater reliability was substantial (Kappa = 0.80).

Conclusions: Hazardous TikTok videos are widely disseminated, medically serious, and shaped by misinformation, peer influence, and algorithmic amplification. These findings are relevant to clinicians and public health professionals seeking to recognize, document, and prevent social media-related injuries.

TikTok上的风险业务:青少年危险挑战的内容分析。
简介:TikTok是一个主要的用户生成危险内容的平台,涉及青少年和年轻人。危险视频不仅仅局限于命名的挑战,还包括特技、冒险和模仿行为,这些行为可能会通过算法推广和同伴参与来鼓励模仿。这项研究描述了危险的TikTok视频,确定了它们的机制和临床后果,探讨了青少年和年轻人参与其中的原因,并研究了加速它们传播的社交网络和算法特征。方法:这种描述性定性内容分析检查了公开的TikTok视频,这些视频描述了青少年和年轻人中潜在的危险行为。视频是通过TikTok直接搜索确定的,并辅以媒体、监管机构和毒理学来源。然后使用标准化的抽象形式对它们进行归档、转录和编码。定性专题分析审查了参与的动机和传播机制,而医生审查则评估了医疗风险和错误信息或虚假信息。结果:69个视频符合纳入标准;其中55条(79.7%)涉及了非常普遍的青少年挑战,点击量超过3万次。28个视频(40.6%)与记录死亡的挑战类型相关,所有确定的行为都被认为是医学上危险的。69个视频中有62个(90.0%)存在医学错误信息或虚假信息。传播通过推荐feed放大、共享视听模板、标签聚合、社会证明、行为强化和通过重新上传、更改标签或编码语言逃避审核来促进。量表间信度显著(Kappa = 0.80)。结论:危险的TikTok视频被广泛传播,在医学上是严重的,并受到错误信息、同伴影响和算法放大的影响。这些发现与临床医生和公共卫生专业人员寻求识别、记录和预防社交媒体相关伤害有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书