[Potential of Machine Learning for Predicting Individual Treatment Success in Inpatient Psychosomatic Rehabilitation].

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2822-5523
Paul-Gerrit Velthuysen, Christoph Kröger, Axel Kobelt-Poenicke
{"title":"[Potential of Machine Learning for Predicting Individual Treatment Success in Inpatient Psychosomatic Rehabilitation].","authors":"Paul-Gerrit Velthuysen, Christoph Kröger, Axel Kobelt-Poenicke","doi":"10.1055/a-2822-5523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate prediction models of individual psychosomatic rehabilitation success based on patient characteristics might help to identify potential non-responders and to optimize the fit between patients and treatment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of machine learning in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Random forest models were trained to predict treatment success in terms of the dimensions of symptom severity, health-related quality of life, interpersonal relationship building, and self-efficacy. In addition, relevant predictors were analyzed. Since random forest allows using both scale values and individual items as independent predictors, the present study utilized 555 potential predictors from 16 self-assessment instruments and 11 personal characteristics. This is a secondary data analysis of a dataset collected in a naturalistic single-group pre-post design. The random forest models were implemented using nested cross-validation. In the outer cross-validation, the final model was validated, and the included predictors were analyzed for their respective permutation importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on the dimension, between 30.02% and 38.94% of the variance in individual treatment success could be explained. In external cross-validation, between 29.33% and 37.83% of the variance was explained. Across all dimensions, a total of 45 predictors - 17 scale scores and 28 single items - were included. Only two predictors were relevant for all dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using random forest models, large proportions of variance in individual treatment success could be explained for all investigated dimensions. In cross-validation, the large effect sizes and generalizability regarding new observations could be confirmed for all investigated dimensions. The analysis of relevant predictors provides additional evidence for predictors already associated with treatment success, while emphasizing the need of a nuanced consideration of psychosomatic rehabilitation success. A practical implementation of personalized treatments in the sense of personalized medicine does not seem feasible in the near future due to numerous limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"65 4","pages":"207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2822-5523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate prediction models of individual psychosomatic rehabilitation success based on patient characteristics might help to identify potential non-responders and to optimize the fit between patients and treatment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of machine learning in this context.

Methods: Random forest models were trained to predict treatment success in terms of the dimensions of symptom severity, health-related quality of life, interpersonal relationship building, and self-efficacy. In addition, relevant predictors were analyzed. Since random forest allows using both scale values and individual items as independent predictors, the present study utilized 555 potential predictors from 16 self-assessment instruments and 11 personal characteristics. This is a secondary data analysis of a dataset collected in a naturalistic single-group pre-post design. The random forest models were implemented using nested cross-validation. In the outer cross-validation, the final model was validated, and the included predictors were analyzed for their respective permutation importance.

Results: Depending on the dimension, between 30.02% and 38.94% of the variance in individual treatment success could be explained. In external cross-validation, between 29.33% and 37.83% of the variance was explained. Across all dimensions, a total of 45 predictors - 17 scale scores and 28 single items - were included. Only two predictors were relevant for all dimensions.

Conclusion: Using random forest models, large proportions of variance in individual treatment success could be explained for all investigated dimensions. In cross-validation, the large effect sizes and generalizability regarding new observations could be confirmed for all investigated dimensions. The analysis of relevant predictors provides additional evidence for predictors already associated with treatment success, while emphasizing the need of a nuanced consideration of psychosomatic rehabilitation success. A practical implementation of personalized treatments in the sense of personalized medicine does not seem feasible in the near future due to numerous limitations.

[机器学习预测住院患者身心康复个体治疗成功的潜力]。
目的:基于患者特征的个体心身康复成功的准确预测模型可能有助于识别潜在的无反应者,并优化患者与治疗之间的匹配。本研究的目的是研究机器学习在这种情况下的潜力。方法:训练随机森林模型,从症状严重程度、健康相关生活质量、人际关系建立和自我效能等维度预测治疗成功。并对相关预测因素进行了分析。由于随机森林允许使用量表值和个别项目作为独立的预测因子,本研究利用了来自16个自我评估工具和11个个人特征的555个潜在预测因子。这是在自然的单组前后设计中收集的数据集的二次数据分析。随机森林模型采用嵌套交叉验证实现。在外部交叉验证中,对最终模型进行验证,并分析所包含的预测因子各自的排列重要性。结果:根据不同的维度,个体治疗成功率的差异在30.02%至38.94%之间可以解释。在外部交叉验证中,29.33% ~ 37.83%的方差被解释。在所有维度中,共有45个预测因素——17个量表得分和28个单项——被包括在内。只有两个预测因子与所有维度相关。结论:使用随机森林模型,个体治疗成功的大比例方差可以解释所有调查维度。在交叉验证中,对于所有被调查的维度,可以确认关于新观察的大效应量和概括性。相关预测因素的分析为已经与治疗成功相关的预测因素提供了额外的证据,同时强调需要细致入微地考虑身心康复的成功。由于许多限制,个性化医疗意义上的个性化治疗的实际实施在不久的将来似乎是不可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书