Fitting in or standing out: a scoping review of gender-related findings in Nordic EMS through an organizational socialization lens.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lindström Veronica, R C Ericsson, R Sinisalo, A Venesoja
{"title":"Fitting in or standing out: a scoping review of gender-related findings in Nordic EMS through an organizational socialization lens.","authors":"Lindström Veronica, R C Ericsson, R Sinisalo, A Venesoja","doi":"10.1186/s13049-026-01677-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and map research on workplace culture, occupational health, exposure to violence, and organizational dynamics among Emergency Medical Service (EMS) professionals in Nordic countries, focusing on studies reporting gender-related findings between 2010 and 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodological guidance and reported using the PRISMA-ScR framework. Searches were performed in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering the period 2010-2025. Studies focusing on EMS professionals and workplace experiences related to gender, workplace culture, discrimination, leadership, or organizational factors were eligible. Data were charted descriptively, using an inductive content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven peer-reviewed studies and five master's theses met the inclusion criteria, comprising cross-sectional, prospective cohort, and observational designs. Three explicitly examined gender/equality; other gender-related differentiated findings were reported as secondary observations. Women reported higher physical and psychosocial work demands (43% vs. 22%; 41% vs. 20%), greater concerns about threats and violence (58% vs. 38%), and higher levels of mental health problems (29% vs. 8%) and sleep disturbances (60% vs. 39%). Despite this, women demonstrated higher physical capacity, while men had higher cardiovascular disease risk factors. Men reported greater exposure to certain critical incidents, whereas stress levels were similar between genders. Workplace violence was common, with differences between men and women observed in exposure, perception, and support-seeking behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review found that gender-related patterns are present across workplace demands, health outcomes, exposure to violence, and critical incidents, but are rarely explicitly addressed in Nordic EMS research. Rather than isolated findings, these patterns appear to be embedded in organizational processes that shape norms, expectations, and professional identities. For example, women reported higher work demands, greater concern about workplace risks, and poorer mental health outcomes, despite demonstrating high physical capacity, while men reported greater exposure to certain critical incidents. Interpreted through the lens of organizational socialization, these findings suggest unequal access to legitimacy, well-being, and career opportunities, with implications for workforce sustainability. Addressing these issues through organizational and educational strategies may improve working conditions, reduce workplace risks, and support a more equitable and sustainable Nordic EMS workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-026-01677-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore and map research on workplace culture, occupational health, exposure to violence, and organizational dynamics among Emergency Medical Service (EMS) professionals in Nordic countries, focusing on studies reporting gender-related findings between 2010 and 2025.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodological guidance and reported using the PRISMA-ScR framework. Searches were performed in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering the period 2010-2025. Studies focusing on EMS professionals and workplace experiences related to gender, workplace culture, discrimination, leadership, or organizational factors were eligible. Data were charted descriptively, using an inductive content analysis approach.

Results: Seven peer-reviewed studies and five master's theses met the inclusion criteria, comprising cross-sectional, prospective cohort, and observational designs. Three explicitly examined gender/equality; other gender-related differentiated findings were reported as secondary observations. Women reported higher physical and psychosocial work demands (43% vs. 22%; 41% vs. 20%), greater concerns about threats and violence (58% vs. 38%), and higher levels of mental health problems (29% vs. 8%) and sleep disturbances (60% vs. 39%). Despite this, women demonstrated higher physical capacity, while men had higher cardiovascular disease risk factors. Men reported greater exposure to certain critical incidents, whereas stress levels were similar between genders. Workplace violence was common, with differences between men and women observed in exposure, perception, and support-seeking behaviors.

Conclusion: This scoping review found that gender-related patterns are present across workplace demands, health outcomes, exposure to violence, and critical incidents, but are rarely explicitly addressed in Nordic EMS research. Rather than isolated findings, these patterns appear to be embedded in organizational processes that shape norms, expectations, and professional identities. For example, women reported higher work demands, greater concern about workplace risks, and poorer mental health outcomes, despite demonstrating high physical capacity, while men reported greater exposure to certain critical incidents. Interpreted through the lens of organizational socialization, these findings suggest unequal access to legitimacy, well-being, and career opportunities, with implications for workforce sustainability. Addressing these issues through organizational and educational strategies may improve working conditions, reduce workplace risks, and support a more equitable and sustainable Nordic EMS workforce.

适应或脱颖而出:通过组织社会化镜头对北欧EMS中与性别相关的发现进行范围审查。
目的:探索和绘制北欧国家紧急医疗服务(EMS)专业人员的工作场所文化、职业健康、暴力暴露和组织动态的研究地图,重点关注2010年至2025年间报告性别相关发现的研究。方法:根据JBI方法学指南进行范围审查,并使用PRISMA-ScR框架进行报告。在CINAHL、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar中进行了检索,检索时间为2010-2025年。关注EMS专业人员和与性别、工作场所文化、歧视、领导或组织因素相关的工作场所经验的研究是合格的。使用归纳内容分析方法,对数据进行描述性绘制。结果:7项同行评议研究和5篇硕士论文符合纳入标准,包括横断面、前瞻性队列和观察性设计。其中三个明确审查了性别/平等;其他与性别相关的差异发现作为次要观察报告。女性报告了更高的生理和心理工作要求(43%对22%;41%对20%),更担心威胁和暴力(58%对38%),更严重的心理健康问题(29%对8%)和睡眠障碍(60%对39%)。尽管如此,女性表现出更高的体能,而男性则有更高的心血管疾病风险因素。男性更容易受到某些关键事件的影响,而男女之间的压力水平相似。工作场所暴力很常见,男性和女性在暴露、感知和寻求支持行为方面存在差异。结论:本范围审查发现,与性别相关的模式存在于工作场所需求、健康结果、暴力暴露和关键事件中,但在北欧EMS研究中很少明确解决。这些模式不是孤立的发现,而是嵌入到组织过程中,形成规范、期望和职业身份。例如,妇女报告的工作要求更高,对工作场所风险的担忧更大,心理健康结果更差,尽管她们表现出很高的身体能力,而男子报告的某些重大事件的风险更大。从组织社会化的角度来看,这些研究结果表明,获得合法性、福利和职业机会的机会不平等,这对劳动力的可持续性有影响。通过组织和教育策略解决这些问题可以改善工作条件,减少工作场所风险,并支持北欧EMS劳动力更加公平和可持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书