[Between claim and reality: Why WHP offers often go unused and how managers can change this].

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2918-6596

Katharina Flaig, Madeleine Renyi, Kirsten Steinhausen, Nathalie Haas

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workplace health promotion (WHP) is essential to counter rising work-related stress, yet participation remains low. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for WHP uptake and derive actionable recommendations.

Methods: Mixed-methods design combining an online survey (n=103) and three workshops (n=23).

Results: Lack of time, inflexible programmes and insufficient managerial support emerged as key barriers. Employees preferred flexible, working-time-integrated offers, company fitness, bonus schemes and digital formats.

Conclusion: Managers are pivotal; a combined action bundle including incentives, leadership training and tailored programmes is recommended.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[在主张和现实之间：为什么WHP报价经常被闲置，以及管理者如何改变这一点]。

背景：工作场所健康促进（WHP）对于应对日益增加的工作压力至关重要，但参与率仍然很低。本研究旨在确定WHP吸收的障碍和促进因素，并得出可行的建议。方法：采用在线调查（n=103）和3个工作坊（n=23）相结合的混合方法设计。结果：缺乏时间、方案不灵活和管理支持不足成为主要障碍。员工更喜欢灵活的、与工作时间相结合的待遇、公司健身、奖金计划和数字格式。结论：管理者是关键；建议采取一揽子联合行动，包括奖励、领导力培训和量身定制的方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

18.20%

发文量

308

期刊介绍： The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.