Motion sickness among offshore wind farm workers - a scoping review of current research.

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrew Fenn, Lisa Loloma Froholdt
{"title":"Motion sickness among offshore wind farm workers - a scoping review of current research.","authors":"Andrew Fenn, Lisa Loloma Froholdt","doi":"10.5603/imh.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transfer of offshore wind farm workers (WFWs) between transport vessels and wind turbines is a hazardous operation with a disproportionately high occurrence of “high potential” incidents. Motion sickness (MS) has been reported to affect offshore wind farm workers’ well-being and has been identified as a job demand, especially during crew transfer and ladder-climbing operations. This scoping review sought to determine the extent to which current research defines, describes, and quantifies MS among offshore WFWs and to identify relevant research gaps.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Using terms related to MS and offshore wind farm operations, searches were conducted of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies published in English between 1990 and 2024 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 795 articles retrieved, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The included articles describe MS as a job demand but do not clearly define it in the research context. Consequently, it remains unclear which symptoms of MS constitute a job demand and how workers are affected. Additionally, indications of MS prevalence are required, using a clear definition that accounts for the wide range of subjective symptoms other than vomiting. No research appears to have been carried out in which MS among WFWs was studied as a broad occupational health issue within the offshore wind energy sector.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identifies research gaps concerning MS among offshore WFWs. Motion sickness-re-lated issues have either been overlooked, studied in isolation, or insufficiently addressed. These issues constitute empirical, methodological, and knowledge gaps, necessitating a need for systematic studies that address these research gaps in the context of the offshore wind energy sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":45964,"journal":{"name":"International Maritime Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Maritime Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.101691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transfer of offshore wind farm workers (WFWs) between transport vessels and wind turbines is a hazardous operation with a disproportionately high occurrence of “high potential” incidents. Motion sickness (MS) has been reported to affect offshore wind farm workers’ well-being and has been identified as a job demand, especially during crew transfer and ladder-climbing operations. This scoping review sought to determine the extent to which current research defines, describes, and quantifies MS among offshore WFWs and to identify relevant research gaps.

Material and methods: Using terms related to MS and offshore wind farm operations, searches were conducted of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies published in English between 1990 and 2024 were included.

Results: Of 795 articles retrieved, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The included articles describe MS as a job demand but do not clearly define it in the research context. Consequently, it remains unclear which symptoms of MS constitute a job demand and how workers are affected. Additionally, indications of MS prevalence are required, using a clear definition that accounts for the wide range of subjective symptoms other than vomiting. No research appears to have been carried out in which MS among WFWs was studied as a broad occupational health issue within the offshore wind energy sector.

Conclusions: This review identifies research gaps concerning MS among offshore WFWs. Motion sickness-re-lated issues have either been overlooked, studied in isolation, or insufficiently addressed. These issues constitute empirical, methodological, and knowledge gaps, necessitating a need for systematic studies that address these research gaps in the context of the offshore wind energy sector.

海上风电场工人的晕动病——当前研究的范围综述。
背景:海上风电场工人(WFWs)在运输船和风力涡轮机之间的转移是一项危险的操作,具有不成比例的高发生率€śhigh潜在的事故。据报道,晕动病(MS)会影响海上风电场工人的身心健康,并已被确定为一种工作需求,特别是在船员转移和爬梯作业期间。本综述旨在确定当前研究对近海海洋生物中质谱的定义、描述和量化的程度,并确定相关的研究差距。材料和方法:使用与MS和海上风电场操作相关的术语,对PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了搜索。其中包括1990年至2024年间用英语发表的研究。结果:检索到的795篇文献中,11篇符合纳入标准。纳入的文章将MS描述为一种工作需求,但在研究背景下没有明确定义。因此,目前尚不清楚MS的哪些症状构成了工作需求,以及工人如何受到影响。此外,需要MS患病率的适应症,使用一个明确的定义来解释呕吐以外的广泛主观症状。似乎没有开展任何研究,将wfw中的多发性硬化症作为海上风能部门内广泛的职业健康问题进行研究。结论:本综述明确了近海WFWs中MS研究的空白。晕动病相关的问题要么被忽视,要么被孤立地研究,要么没有得到充分的解决。这些问题构成了经验、方法和知识上的差距,因此需要进行系统的研究,以解决海上风能领域的这些研究差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Maritime Health
International Maritime Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书