Brachial artery reactivity in sepsis and septic shock patients in the intensive care unit: a prospective exploratory study in an Indian population.

IF 2.3 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Karrothu Trimurthulu, Afzal Azim, Banani Poddar, Mohan Gurjar, Zafar Neyaz
{"title":"Brachial artery reactivity in sepsis and septic shock patients in the intensive care unit: a prospective exploratory study in an Indian population.","authors":"Karrothu Trimurthulu, Afzal Azim, Banani Poddar, Mohan Gurjar, Zafar Neyaz","doi":"10.4266/acc.001508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is increasingly recognized as a state of profound endothelial dysfunction triggered by infection, leading to microvascular injury and multi-organ failure. Non-invasive assessment of brachial artery reactivity using ultrasound following transient ischemia provides an indirect yet practical tool for evaluating endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to determine the association between brachial artery reactivity indices and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective analysis, 120 participants were enrolled, with 40 in each group (sepsis, septic shock, and healthy controls). Within 24 hours of ICU admission, baseline and post-deflation arterial diameters and velocity time integral (VTI) were measured using ultrasonography after three minutes of cuff occlusion at 50 mm Hg above systolic pressure and compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare survivors and non-survivors, correlating with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flow mediated dilation (FMD), hyperemic VTI, and change in VTI (ΔVTI) were significantly reduced (P<0.001) in sepsis and septic shock compared with controls. Non-survivors (n=38) had significantly lower hyperemic VTI (53.40 cm/cardiac cycle [interquartile range, 40.28-65.95] vs. 61.30 [48.18-84.85], P=0.041) and lower ΔVTI (35.80 [20.3-43.66] vs. 44.65 [30.95-57.23], P=0.011) than survivors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed ΔVTI (cutoff, 43.07 cm/cardiac cycle) had higher specificity (59.5% vs. 54.8%) than hyperemic VTI (cutoff, 60.15), while both showed equal sensitivity (71.1%) for discriminating ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brachial artery reactivity indices were impaired in sepsis and septic shock. Hyperemic VTI and ΔVTI may have potential as complementary bedside prognostic markers requiring further validation in larger multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.001508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is increasingly recognized as a state of profound endothelial dysfunction triggered by infection, leading to microvascular injury and multi-organ failure. Non-invasive assessment of brachial artery reactivity using ultrasound following transient ischemia provides an indirect yet practical tool for evaluating endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to determine the association between brachial artery reactivity indices and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients.

Methods: In this prospective analysis, 120 participants were enrolled, with 40 in each group (sepsis, septic shock, and healthy controls). Within 24 hours of ICU admission, baseline and post-deflation arterial diameters and velocity time integral (VTI) were measured using ultrasonography after three minutes of cuff occlusion at 50 mm Hg above systolic pressure and compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare survivors and non-survivors, correlating with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.

Results: Flow mediated dilation (FMD), hyperemic VTI, and change in VTI (ΔVTI) were significantly reduced (P<0.001) in sepsis and septic shock compared with controls. Non-survivors (n=38) had significantly lower hyperemic VTI (53.40 cm/cardiac cycle [interquartile range, 40.28-65.95] vs. 61.30 [48.18-84.85], P=0.041) and lower ΔVTI (35.80 [20.3-43.66] vs. 44.65 [30.95-57.23], P=0.011) than survivors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed ΔVTI (cutoff, 43.07 cm/cardiac cycle) had higher specificity (59.5% vs. 54.8%) than hyperemic VTI (cutoff, 60.15), while both showed equal sensitivity (71.1%) for discriminating ICU mortality.

Conclusions: Brachial artery reactivity indices were impaired in sepsis and septic shock. Hyperemic VTI and ΔVTI may have potential as complementary bedside prognostic markers requiring further validation in larger multicenter studies.

重症监护室脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的肱动脉反应性:一项印度人群的前瞻性探索性研究。
背景:脓毒症越来越被认为是一种由感染引发的严重内皮功能障碍状态,导致微血管损伤和多器官功能衰竭。短暂性缺血后使用超声无创评估肱动脉反应性为评估内皮功能障碍提供了一种间接但实用的工具。本研究旨在确定脓毒症和感染性休克患者肱动脉反应性指数与重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率之间的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性分析中,120名参与者入组,每组40名(败血症、感染性休克和健康对照组)。在ICU入院24小时内,在收缩压以上50 mm Hg袖带闭塞3分钟后,用超声测量基线和放气后动脉直径和速度时间积分(VTI),并进行比较。进行亚组分析,比较幸存者和非幸存者,与急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE) II和顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分相关。结果:血流介导的舒张(FMD)、充血性VTI和VTI变化(ΔVTI)明显降低(p结论:脓毒症和感染性休克时肱动脉反应性指标受损。充血性VTI和ΔVTI可能有潜力作为补充的床边预后指标,需要在更大的多中心研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书