Therapeutic apartheid: a cross-sectional assessment of estimated cost, accessibility, affordability, and availability among psychotropic medications across 25 regions.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-08-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253261440374
Javier A Flores-Cohaila, Luis Arturo Vílchez Salcedo, Carlos Alexis Salgado Valenzuela, Cesar Li Amenero, Jose Carlos Bojórquez-De la Torre, Ana Maria Zamalloa-Torres, Brayan Miranda-Chavez, Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria, Cesar Copaja-Corzo
{"title":"Therapeutic apartheid: a cross-sectional assessment of estimated cost, accessibility, affordability, and availability among psychotropic medications across 25 regions.","authors":"Javier A Flores-Cohaila, Luis Arturo Vílchez Salcedo, Carlos Alexis Salgado Valenzuela, Cesar Li Amenero, Jose Carlos Bojórquez-De la Torre, Ana Maria Zamalloa-Torres, Brayan Miranda-Chavez, Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria, Cesar Copaja-Corzo","doi":"10.1177/20451253261440374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental disorders affect approximately 20% of the global population and remain a leading cause of disability and premature mortality. Despite pharmacotherapy being central to treatment, access to psychotropic medicines is highly unequal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In South America, comprehensive national evaluations integrating availability, price, affordability, and geographic accessibility are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the availability, cost, affordability, and geographic accessibility of psychotropic medicines across public and private sectors in all regions of Peru.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary cross-sectional analytical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use open-access data from the Peruvian Observatory of Pharmaceutical Products between May 20 and 25, 2025. A total of 54 psychotropic medicines were included based on the WHO and national essential medicine lists and expert consensus. Outcomes included median unit cost (interquartile range), availability (% of facilities), affordability (days of minimum wage for a 30-day treatment), and regional accessibility. Public-private cost differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Cliff's Delta.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 22.2% of psychotropics were classified as essential by both WHO and national criteria. Median costs were substantially higher in the private sector, with price differences ranging from 2- to 140-fold (e.g., risperidone 2 mg: $1.41 private vs $0.01 public; Cliff's Delta = 0.99). While essential medicines were generally affordable in the public sector (<1 day of minimum wage), newer and long-acting formulations required up to 276 days of labor. Public-sector availability was limited, and geographic accessibility showed marked centralization: several Amazonian and highland regions lacked access to key psychotropics, whereas private-sector availability was near-universal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychotropic medication access in Peru is characterized by profound economic and geographic inequities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20451253261440374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13478660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253261440374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mental disorders affect approximately 20% of the global population and remain a leading cause of disability and premature mortality. Despite pharmacotherapy being central to treatment, access to psychotropic medicines is highly unequal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In South America, comprehensive national evaluations integrating availability, price, affordability, and geographic accessibility are scarce.

Objective: To assess the availability, cost, affordability, and geographic accessibility of psychotropic medicines across public and private sectors in all regions of Peru.

Design: A secondary cross-sectional analytical study.

Methods: We use open-access data from the Peruvian Observatory of Pharmaceutical Products between May 20 and 25, 2025. A total of 54 psychotropic medicines were included based on the WHO and national essential medicine lists and expert consensus. Outcomes included median unit cost (interquartile range), availability (% of facilities), affordability (days of minimum wage for a 30-day treatment), and regional accessibility. Public-private cost differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Cliff's Delta.

Results: Only 22.2% of psychotropics were classified as essential by both WHO and national criteria. Median costs were substantially higher in the private sector, with price differences ranging from 2- to 140-fold (e.g., risperidone 2 mg: $1.41 private vs $0.01 public; Cliff's Delta = 0.99). While essential medicines were generally affordable in the public sector (<1 day of minimum wage), newer and long-acting formulations required up to 276 days of labor. Public-sector availability was limited, and geographic accessibility showed marked centralization: several Amazonian and highland regions lacked access to key psychotropics, whereas private-sector availability was near-universal.

Conclusion: Psychotropic medication access in Peru is characterized by profound economic and geographic inequities.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

治疗隔离:25个地区精神药物估计成本、可及性、可负担性和可得性的横断面评估。
导言:精神障碍影响着全球约20%的人口,并且仍然是导致残疾和过早死亡的主要原因。尽管药物治疗是治疗的核心,但获得精神药物的情况非常不平等,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。在南美洲,综合可得性、价格、可负担性和地理可及性的综合国家评价很少。目的:评估秘鲁所有地区公共和私营部门精神药物的可得性、成本、可负担性和地理可及性。设计:二次横断面分析研究。方法:我们使用秘鲁药品观察站2025年5月20日至25日的开放获取数据。根据世卫组织和国家基本药物清单以及专家共识,共纳入54种精神药物。结果包括单位成本中位数(四分位数范围)、可获得性(设施的百分比)、可负担性(30天治疗的最低工资天数)和区域可及性。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Cliff’s Delta评估公私成本差异。结果:仅有22.2%的精神药物被WHO和国家标准列为必需药物。私营部门的中位数成本要高得多,价格差异从2倍到140倍不等(例如,利培酮2毫克:私营部门1.41美元,公共部门0.01美元;克里夫δ = 0.99)。虽然基本药物在公共部门普遍负担得起(结论:秘鲁的精神药物获取存在严重的经济和地理不平等现象。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书