Therapeutic apartheid: a cross-sectional assessment of estimated cost, accessibility, affordability, and availability among psychotropic medications across 25 regions.
Javier A Flores-Cohaila, Luis Arturo Vílchez Salcedo, Carlos Alexis Salgado Valenzuela, Cesar Li Amenero, Jose Carlos Bojórquez-De la Torre, Ana Maria Zamalloa-Torres, Brayan Miranda-Chavez, Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria, Cesar Copaja-Corzo
{"title":"Therapeutic apartheid: a cross-sectional assessment of estimated cost, accessibility, affordability, and availability among psychotropic medications across 25 regions.","authors":"Javier A Flores-Cohaila, Luis Arturo Vílchez Salcedo, Carlos Alexis Salgado Valenzuela, Cesar Li Amenero, Jose Carlos Bojórquez-De la Torre, Ana Maria Zamalloa-Torres, Brayan Miranda-Chavez, Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria, Cesar Copaja-Corzo","doi":"10.1177/20451253261440374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental disorders affect approximately 20% of the global population and remain a leading cause of disability and premature mortality. Despite pharmacotherapy being central to treatment, access to psychotropic medicines is highly unequal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In South America, comprehensive national evaluations integrating availability, price, affordability, and geographic accessibility are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the availability, cost, affordability, and geographic accessibility of psychotropic medicines across public and private sectors in all regions of Peru.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary cross-sectional analytical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use open-access data from the Peruvian Observatory of Pharmaceutical Products between May 20 and 25, 2025. A total of 54 psychotropic medicines were included based on the WHO and national essential medicine lists and expert consensus. Outcomes included median unit cost (interquartile range), availability (% of facilities), affordability (days of minimum wage for a 30-day treatment), and regional accessibility. Public-private cost differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Cliff's Delta.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 22.2% of psychotropics were classified as essential by both WHO and national criteria. Median costs were substantially higher in the private sector, with price differences ranging from 2- to 140-fold (e.g., risperidone 2 mg: $1.41 private vs $0.01 public; Cliff's Delta = 0.99). While essential medicines were generally affordable in the public sector (<1 day of minimum wage), newer and long-acting formulations required up to 276 days of labor. Public-sector availability was limited, and geographic accessibility showed marked centralization: several Amazonian and highland regions lacked access to key psychotropics, whereas private-sector availability was near-universal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychotropic medication access in Peru is characterized by profound economic and geographic inequities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20451253261440374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13478660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253261440374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Mental disorders affect approximately 20% of the global population and remain a leading cause of disability and premature mortality. Despite pharmacotherapy being central to treatment, access to psychotropic medicines is highly unequal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In South America, comprehensive national evaluations integrating availability, price, affordability, and geographic accessibility are scarce.
Objective: To assess the availability, cost, affordability, and geographic accessibility of psychotropic medicines across public and private sectors in all regions of Peru.
Design: A secondary cross-sectional analytical study.
Methods: We use open-access data from the Peruvian Observatory of Pharmaceutical Products between May 20 and 25, 2025. A total of 54 psychotropic medicines were included based on the WHO and national essential medicine lists and expert consensus. Outcomes included median unit cost (interquartile range), availability (% of facilities), affordability (days of minimum wage for a 30-day treatment), and regional accessibility. Public-private cost differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Cliff's Delta.
Results: Only 22.2% of psychotropics were classified as essential by both WHO and national criteria. Median costs were substantially higher in the private sector, with price differences ranging from 2- to 140-fold (e.g., risperidone 2 mg: $1.41 private vs $0.01 public; Cliff's Delta = 0.99). While essential medicines were generally affordable in the public sector (<1 day of minimum wage), newer and long-acting formulations required up to 276 days of labor. Public-sector availability was limited, and geographic accessibility showed marked centralization: several Amazonian and highland regions lacked access to key psychotropics, whereas private-sector availability was near-universal.
Conclusion: Psychotropic medication access in Peru is characterized by profound economic and geographic inequities.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.