In vitro approaches to assess respiratory toxicity from volatile organic compounds: an in-depth review.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Olivia C G Lampe, Eva C M Vitucci, Carolyn L Cannon, Kyle Holland, Margaret J Foster, Natalie M Johnson
{"title":"In vitro approaches to assess respiratory toxicity from volatile organic compounds: an in-depth review.","authors":"Olivia C G Lampe, Eva C M Vitucci, Carolyn L Cannon, Kyle Holland, Margaret J Foster, Natalie M Johnson","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfag110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are ubiquitous inhaled pollutants. This review showcases current literature utilizing in vitro models of the human respiratory system to characterize the toxicity of VOCs. To map the existing evidence base, we conducted a scoping review following systematic search and screening procedures. Comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and CENTRAL identified 3,052 records. After screening, 144 original studies evaluating VOC exposures in human lung epithelial models met inclusion criteria. Overall, the current literature reflects substantial heterogeneity in cell models, exposure systems, and endpoints. Among 105 unique VOCs evaluated, acrolein, formaldehyde, toluene diisocyanate, and benzene were most frequently studied. Most investigations used submerged culture systems with liquid-phase VOC application, whereas fewer employed air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures that better mimic inhalation. Cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, proinflammatory signaling, and apoptosis were the most commonly measured endpoints, with oxidative stress frequently identified as an upstream driver of inflammatory and cytotoxic responses. However, mechanistic depth varied, and studies examining metabolism, barrier function, morphology, or transcriptomic regulation were relatively uncommon. Notably, chronic or repeated exposures were rarely conducted. Overall, this review highlights the variety of VOC exposure methods and commonly assessed biological endpoints, as well as the critical lack of more detailed mechanistic studies and somewhat limited VOC/mixture evaluation. The field is expansive but methodologically fragmented, underscoring the need for broader use of human respiratory cell models, more physiologically relevant exposure systems, improved dose characterization, and greater mechanistic resolution to advance understanding and throughput for VOC-induced pulmonary toxicity studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfag110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are ubiquitous inhaled pollutants. This review showcases current literature utilizing in vitro models of the human respiratory system to characterize the toxicity of VOCs. To map the existing evidence base, we conducted a scoping review following systematic search and screening procedures. Comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and CENTRAL identified 3,052 records. After screening, 144 original studies evaluating VOC exposures in human lung epithelial models met inclusion criteria. Overall, the current literature reflects substantial heterogeneity in cell models, exposure systems, and endpoints. Among 105 unique VOCs evaluated, acrolein, formaldehyde, toluene diisocyanate, and benzene were most frequently studied. Most investigations used submerged culture systems with liquid-phase VOC application, whereas fewer employed air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures that better mimic inhalation. Cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, proinflammatory signaling, and apoptosis were the most commonly measured endpoints, with oxidative stress frequently identified as an upstream driver of inflammatory and cytotoxic responses. However, mechanistic depth varied, and studies examining metabolism, barrier function, morphology, or transcriptomic regulation were relatively uncommon. Notably, chronic or repeated exposures were rarely conducted. Overall, this review highlights the variety of VOC exposure methods and commonly assessed biological endpoints, as well as the critical lack of more detailed mechanistic studies and somewhat limited VOC/mixture evaluation. The field is expansive but methodologically fragmented, underscoring the need for broader use of human respiratory cell models, more physiologically relevant exposure systems, improved dose characterization, and greater mechanistic resolution to advance understanding and throughput for VOC-induced pulmonary toxicity studies.

挥发性有机化合物呼吸毒性体外评估方法综述
挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是普遍存在的吸入污染物。这篇综述展示了目前利用人体呼吸系统体外模型来表征VOCs毒性的文献。为了绘制现有的证据库,我们根据系统的搜索和筛选程序进行了范围审查。综合搜索MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed和CENTRAL确定了3052条记录。经过筛选,144项评估人体肺上皮模型中VOC暴露的原始研究符合纳入标准。总的来说,目前的文献反映了细胞模型、暴露系统和终点的实质性异质性。在评估的105种独特的挥发性有机化合物中,丙烯醛、甲醛、甲苯二异氰酸酯和苯是研究最多的。大多数研究使用液相挥发性有机化合物的深层培养系统,而较少使用气液界面(ALI)暴露,更好地模拟吸入。细胞毒性、氧化应激、促炎信号和细胞凋亡是最常见的测量终点,氧化应激经常被认为是炎症和细胞毒性反应的上游驱动因素。然而,机制的深度各不相同,对代谢、屏障功能、形态学或转录组调控的研究相对较少。值得注意的是,很少进行长期或反复暴露。总的来说,这篇综述强调了挥发性有机化合物暴露方法的多样性和通常评估的生物终点,以及缺乏更详细的机制研究和有限的挥发性有机化合物/混合物评估。该领域范围广泛,但方法上零散,强调需要更广泛地使用人体呼吸细胞模型,更多与生理相关的暴露系统,改进剂量表征,提高机制分辨率,以促进对voc诱导的肺毒性研究的理解和通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书