Psychometric Evaluation of the EVCA in Digital Health Settings Using Rasch Analysis Among Patients with Chronic Diseases.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Population Health Management Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-19 DOI:10.1177/19427891261468437
Jing Liu, Tingting Yang, Ruoxin Xu, Jinhua Wan, XiaoJiao Zhu
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the EVCA in Digital Health Settings Using Rasch Analysis Among Patients with Chronic Diseases.","authors":"Jing Liu, Tingting Yang, Ruoxin Xu, Jinhua Wan, XiaoJiao Zhu","doi":"10.1177/19427891261468437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the expansion of internet-based health care, value co-creation behaviors of patients with chronic diseases have become increasingly important. However, appropriate instruments for assessing such behaviors among community-dwelling patients in digital health contexts remain limited. This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the effort in value cocreation activities (EVCA) questionnaire using the Rasch model to establish a valid and reliable measure of patient engagement in value cocreation in digital health. A Chinese version of the EVCA questionnaire, developed following standard procedures for translation and cultural adaptation, was administered to a sample of 417 community-dwelling patients with chronic diseases. Rasch analysis was applied to examine unidimensionality, local dependency, category functioning, item fit, reliability and separation, differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and age, the item-person map, and the score conversion table. The final EVCA showed unidimensionality and no local dependency, with all items demonstrating acceptable fit, satisfactory person and item separation, no significant DIF by gender or age, and greater efficiency of the 4-point than the original 7-point structure. Patients considered the easiest item to complete as item 8, \"Healthy diet,\" while the most difficult items were item 10, \"Seeking information,\" and item 3, \"Proactive involvement in decision making.\" The EVCA exhibits a good fit to the Rasch model and robust psychometric properties, supporting its reliability and validity for assessing patient engagement in value co-creation in digital health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"368-375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891261468437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the expansion of internet-based health care, value co-creation behaviors of patients with chronic diseases have become increasingly important. However, appropriate instruments for assessing such behaviors among community-dwelling patients in digital health contexts remain limited. This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the effort in value cocreation activities (EVCA) questionnaire using the Rasch model to establish a valid and reliable measure of patient engagement in value cocreation in digital health. A Chinese version of the EVCA questionnaire, developed following standard procedures for translation and cultural adaptation, was administered to a sample of 417 community-dwelling patients with chronic diseases. Rasch analysis was applied to examine unidimensionality, local dependency, category functioning, item fit, reliability and separation, differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and age, the item-person map, and the score conversion table. The final EVCA showed unidimensionality and no local dependency, with all items demonstrating acceptable fit, satisfactory person and item separation, no significant DIF by gender or age, and greater efficiency of the 4-point than the original 7-point structure. Patients considered the easiest item to complete as item 8, "Healthy diet," while the most difficult items were item 10, "Seeking information," and item 3, "Proactive involvement in decision making." The EVCA exhibits a good fit to the Rasch model and robust psychometric properties, supporting its reliability and validity for assessing patient engagement in value co-creation in digital health settings.

使用皮疹分析对慢性疾病患者在数字健康环境中的EVCA进行心理测量评估
随着互联网医疗的普及,慢性病患者的价值共创行为变得越来越重要。然而,在数字卫生环境下评估社区居住患者这种行为的适当工具仍然有限。本研究旨在使用Rasch模型对价值共同创造活动(EVCA)问卷中的努力进行心理测量学评估,以建立一种有效可靠的数字医疗中患者参与价值共同创造的测量方法。根据翻译和文化适应的标准程序编制了EVCA问卷的中文版,对417名社区居住的慢性病患者进行了调查。采用Rasch分析对量表的单维性、局部依赖性、类别功能、项目契合度、信度和分离度、性别和年龄差异项目功能、项目-人图和得分转换表进行检验。最终的EVCA表现出单维性和无局部依赖性,所有项目都表现出可接受的契合度,满意的人与项目分离,性别和年龄没有显著的DIF, 4点结构比原来的7点结构效率更高。患者认为最容易完成的项目是第8项“健康饮食”,而最难完成的项目是第10项“寻求信息”和第3项“积极参与决策”。EVCA表现出与Rasch模型的良好契合性和强大的心理测量特性,支持其在评估数字健康环境中患者参与价值共同创造方面的可靠性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书