Identifying Quality Indicators for Prehospital Care Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Focused Scoping Review.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Petrus Malherbe, Eric Bustos, Will Dunn, Lindsey Cella, Lara Rappaport
{"title":"Identifying Quality Indicators for Prehospital Care Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Focused Scoping Review.","authors":"Petrus Malherbe, Eric Bustos, Will Dunn, Lindsey Cella, Lara Rappaport","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2026.2719960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a high rate of mortality. While prehospital management of OHCA is well described, post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care in the prehospital setting is often based on in-hospital care and broadly lacks evidence-based prehospital-specific recommendations. Additionally, there are no formal standardized quality indicators to benchmark post-ROSC care in the prehospital setting. This study served to systematically identify and appraise post-ROSC documents to synthesize a set of potential quality indicators to inform the survey of a multi-stage Delphi consensus for national quality indicators for prehospital care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across various databases for quality indicators and recommendations for prehospital care for post-ROSC following OHCA. Two reviewers performed title and abstract screening, full-text review, and quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) independently and in duplicate. Identified quality indicators and recommendations were extracted as potential quality indicators and categorized into functional domains by the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 337 initial records, of which 87 underwent full-text review, and 46 studies met the <i>a priori</i> inclusion criteria. Studies from over 17 different countries were identified, of which the United States published the majority (<i>n</i> = 13). Randomized control trials represented the largest portion of the included studies (<i>n</i> = 18). The majority of study settings were in-hospital. Only five of the included studies made formal recommendations, and only two listed quality indicators. A total of 36 underwent appraisal with MMAT, of which the overall quality was generally high. A total of 16 potential quality indicators were extracted from the included studies and were grouped into five different domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This focused scoping review highlights a lack of specific prehospital post-ROSC benchmarks and quality indicators. The identified potential quality indicators provide a foundational framework for a Delphi process for expert consensus on specific and measurable quality indicators. These indicators aim to standardize prehospital post-ROSC care for OHCA for national datasets like the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2719960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a high rate of mortality. While prehospital management of OHCA is well described, post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care in the prehospital setting is often based on in-hospital care and broadly lacks evidence-based prehospital-specific recommendations. Additionally, there are no formal standardized quality indicators to benchmark post-ROSC care in the prehospital setting. This study served to systematically identify and appraise post-ROSC documents to synthesize a set of potential quality indicators to inform the survey of a multi-stage Delphi consensus for national quality indicators for prehospital care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across various databases for quality indicators and recommendations for prehospital care for post-ROSC following OHCA. Two reviewers performed title and abstract screening, full-text review, and quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) independently and in duplicate. Identified quality indicators and recommendations were extracted as potential quality indicators and categorized into functional domains by the research team.

Results: The search yielded 337 initial records, of which 87 underwent full-text review, and 46 studies met the a priori inclusion criteria. Studies from over 17 different countries were identified, of which the United States published the majority (n = 13). Randomized control trials represented the largest portion of the included studies (n = 18). The majority of study settings were in-hospital. Only five of the included studies made formal recommendations, and only two listed quality indicators. A total of 36 underwent appraisal with MMAT, of which the overall quality was generally high. A total of 16 potential quality indicators were extracted from the included studies and were grouped into five different domains.

Conclusions: This focused scoping review highlights a lack of specific prehospital post-ROSC benchmarks and quality indicators. The identified potential quality indicators provide a foundational framework for a Delphi process for expert consensus on specific and measurable quality indicators. These indicators aim to standardize prehospital post-ROSC care for OHCA for national datasets like the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival.

确定院外心脏骤停后院前护理的质量指标:一项重点范围审查。
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)死亡率高。虽然OHCA的院前管理得到了很好的描述,但院前环境中的自发循环恢复(ROSC)护理通常基于院内护理,普遍缺乏基于证据的院前特异性建议。此外,没有正式的标准化质量指标来衡量院前环境中的rosc后护理。本研究旨在系统地识别和评价rosc后的文件,以合成一套潜在的质量指标,为院外心脏骤停后院前护理国家质量指标的多阶段德尔菲共识调查提供信息。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,系统地检索了各种数据库,以获取OHCA后rosc后院前护理的质量指标和建议。两名审稿人使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)独立并一式两份进行标题和摘要筛选、全文审查和质量评估。研究小组将确定的质量指标和建议提取为潜在的质量指标,并将其分类为功能域。结果:检索得到337条初始记录,其中87条进行了全文审查,46项研究符合先验纳入标准。来自17个不同国家的研究被确定,其中美国发表的研究最多(n = 13)。随机对照试验占纳入研究的最大部分(n = 18)。大多数研究都是在医院进行的。在纳入的研究中,只有五项提出了正式建议,只有两项列出了质量指标。MMAT评估共36例,整体质量普遍较高。从纳入的研究中提取了16个潜在的质量指标,并将其分为5个不同的领域。结论:这一重点范围审查强调缺乏具体的院前rosc后基准和质量指标。确定的潜在质量指标为专家就具体和可衡量的质量指标达成共识的德尔菲过程提供了一个基础框架。这些指标旨在使心脏骤停登记处等国家数据集的OHCA院前rosc后护理标准化,以提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书