Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatric Patients: Current Software Tools and Bedside Guided Application.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Drugs Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s40272-026-00763-4
Abdullah Aljutayli, Emna Gaies, Mohammed S Alasmari, Zekra Kamel Aljehani, Abrar Samman, Sara Abudahab, Manal Abouelkheir, Abdullah Alsultan
{"title":"Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatric Patients: Current Software Tools and Bedside Guided Application.","authors":"Abdullah Aljutayli, Emna Gaies, Mohammed S Alasmari, Zekra Kamel Aljehani, Abrar Samman, Sara Abudahab, Manal Abouelkheir, Abdullah Alsultan","doi":"10.1007/s40272-026-00763-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized dosing is particularly important in pediatric patients, as age-related physiological maturation, developmental changes, and patient-specific factors contribute to substantial pharmacokinetic variability. Standard dosing approaches often fail to adequately account for this heterogeneity and may lead to subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic drug concentrations. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) addresses these limitations by integrating individual patient data with population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to optimize dosing at the individual level more accurately.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to (1) provide a structured overview of currently available bedside-compatible MIPD software applications for pediatric dosing, (2) systematically summarize published clinical studies evaluating their use in pediatric and neonatal populations, and (3) illustrate practical bedside application through a step-by-step tutorial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified MIPD software tools that incorporate Bayesian forecasting and at least one pediatric module through iterative literature searches using terms for MIPD and dosing software, and by developer verification. For eligible platforms, we reviewed PubMed-indexed clinical studies involving pediatric patients, summarizing key aspects including study design, population, drug, clinical decision support-related objectives, and findings. A representative tutorial was developed using NextDose for neonatal vancomycin dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 available MIPD software platforms, varying in deployment, model libraries, drug coverage, electronic health record integration, and regulatory status (e.g., CE-marked medical devices vs non-regulated clinical decision support). Review of 26 clinical studies enrolling more than 4000 pediatric and neonatal patients demonstrated that MIPD consistently outperformed conventional methods in predictive accuracy, precision, and pharmacokinetic target attainment, including significant improvements in target area under the curve attainment for key drugs like vancomycin. Benefits included a reduced sampling burden and faster therapeutic exposure, predominantly for antibiotics (vancomycin, tobramycin, gentamicin) and select chemotherapeutics (busulfan).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Model-informed precision dosing software tools offer substantial potential to improve precision dosing in pediatrics, with robust evidence of superior target attainment and operational advantages. Gaps remain in prospective randomized trials, direct patient-centered outcome data, cost-effectiveness analyses, non-antibiotic drug coverage, and clinician training.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"447-464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-026-00763-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personalized dosing is particularly important in pediatric patients, as age-related physiological maturation, developmental changes, and patient-specific factors contribute to substantial pharmacokinetic variability. Standard dosing approaches often fail to adequately account for this heterogeneity and may lead to subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic drug concentrations. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) addresses these limitations by integrating individual patient data with population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to optimize dosing at the individual level more accurately.

Objective: This review aimed to (1) provide a structured overview of currently available bedside-compatible MIPD software applications for pediatric dosing, (2) systematically summarize published clinical studies evaluating their use in pediatric and neonatal populations, and (3) illustrate practical bedside application through a step-by-step tutorial.

Methods: We identified MIPD software tools that incorporate Bayesian forecasting and at least one pediatric module through iterative literature searches using terms for MIPD and dosing software, and by developer verification. For eligible platforms, we reviewed PubMed-indexed clinical studies involving pediatric patients, summarizing key aspects including study design, population, drug, clinical decision support-related objectives, and findings. A representative tutorial was developed using NextDose for neonatal vancomycin dosing.

Results: We identified 11 available MIPD software platforms, varying in deployment, model libraries, drug coverage, electronic health record integration, and regulatory status (e.g., CE-marked medical devices vs non-regulated clinical decision support). Review of 26 clinical studies enrolling more than 4000 pediatric and neonatal patients demonstrated that MIPD consistently outperformed conventional methods in predictive accuracy, precision, and pharmacokinetic target attainment, including significant improvements in target area under the curve attainment for key drugs like vancomycin. Benefits included a reduced sampling burden and faster therapeutic exposure, predominantly for antibiotics (vancomycin, tobramycin, gentamicin) and select chemotherapeutics (busulfan).

Conclusions: Model-informed precision dosing software tools offer substantial potential to improve precision dosing in pediatrics, with robust evidence of superior target attainment and operational advantages. Gaps remain in prospective randomized trials, direct patient-centered outcome data, cost-effectiveness analyses, non-antibiotic drug coverage, and clinician training.

基于模型的儿科患者精确给药:当前的软件工具和床边指导应用。
背景:个性化给药对儿科患者尤为重要,因为与年龄相关的生理成熟、发育变化和患者特异性因素会导致实质性的药代动力学变异性。标准给药方法往往不能充分考虑这种异质性,并可能导致亚治疗或超治疗药物浓度。模型信息精确给药(MIPD)通过将个体患者数据与群体药代动力学/药效学模型相结合来解决这些局限性,从而更准确地优化个体水平的给药。目的:本综述旨在(1)提供目前可用的床边兼容的儿科给药MIPD软件应用的结构化概述,(2)系统总结已发表的临床研究,评估其在儿科和新生儿人群中的应用,以及(3)通过一步一步的教程说明实际的床边应用。方法:通过使用MIPD和给药软件的术语进行反复文献检索,并通过开发者验证,我们确定了包含贝叶斯预测和至少一个儿科模块的MIPD软件工具。对于符合条件的平台,我们回顾了pubmed索引的涉及儿科患者的临床研究,总结了包括研究设计、人群、药物、临床决策支持相关目标和研究结果在内的关键方面。使用NextDose制定了新生儿万古霉素剂量的代表性指南。结果:我们确定了11个可用的MIPD软件平台,在部署、模型库、药物覆盖范围、电子健康记录集成和监管状态(例如,ce标志的医疗器械与非监管的临床决策支持)方面各不相同。对纳入4000多名儿童和新生儿患者的26项临床研究的回顾表明,MIPD在预测准确性、精密度和药代动力学目标实现方面始终优于传统方法,包括万古霉素等关键药物在曲线下目标区域的实现方面有显著改善。好处包括减少采样负担和更快的治疗暴露,主要是抗生素(万古霉素,妥布霉素,庆大霉素)和选择化疗药物(布苏凡)。结论:基于模型的精确给药软件工具为提高儿科精确给药提供了巨大的潜力,有强有力的证据表明其具有卓越的目标实现和操作优势。在前瞻性随机试验、直接以患者为中心的结果数据、成本效益分析、非抗生素药物覆盖和临床医生培训方面仍存在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书