Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Induction Compliance Checklist in Children Undergoing Mask Anesthesia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-19 DOI:10.1002/pan.70290
Yesim Andiran Senayli, Nida Kiyici, Sevgi Ulusoy Tangul, Cevdet Yardimci, Mehmet Kara, Atilla Senayli, Zeev N Kain
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Induction Compliance Checklist in Children Undergoing Mask Anesthesia.","authors":"Yesim Andiran Senayli, Nida Kiyici, Sevgi Ulusoy Tangul, Cevdet Yardimci, Mehmet Kara, Atilla Senayli, Zeev N Kain","doi":"10.1002/pan.70290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many children undergoing anesthesia commonly exhibit distress behaviors such as anxiety, crying, and physical resistance. Assessment of this behavior is important as it could lead to postoperative behavioral changes and delayed recovery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-observer reliability of the Turkish version of the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC), which was developed to assess compliance behaviors in children during anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was planned as a prospective observational study. Following translation of the original ICC, content validity was examined using the Davis technique with the opinions of 10 experts. Next, Turkish ICC was applied simultaneously and independently by three independent observers during mask induction to 184 children (ASA I-III) aged 1-7 years undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Inter-observer reliability was evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss Kappa/Gwet's AC1; internal consistency with KR-20 and McDonald's omega; and construct validity with single-factor confirmatory factor analysis (WLSMV). Item analysis was performed with a tetrachoric correlation matrix, floor and ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was excellent (I-CVI 0.90-1.00, S-CVI≈0.99). Inter-observer reliability for the total score was excellent: InCC (1, 2) = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94), InCC (2, 3) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). At the item level, Gwet's AC1 values ranged from 0.81 to 0.97, while Kappa values were generally 0.75-0.90 except for M11. Internal consistency was at an acceptable level with KR-20 0.49-0.52 and McDonald's omega 0.66-0.82. These results are low due to the floor effect caused by premedication. Confirmatory factor analysis moderately supported the single-factor structure (best fit in Observer Surgeon: CFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.907). High floor effect was prominent especially in rarely observed severe behaviors (M7-M11); strong correlation was observed between M9-M10 (0.89-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following rigorous analysis, we found that the Turkish ICC is a reliable and valid tool that can assess children's compliance behaviors during pediatric anesthesia induction. Excellent inter-observer agreement and high content validity support its suitability for clinical and research use. The Turkish Induction Compliance Checklist is a reliable and valid measurement tool in the Turkish pediatric population. It can contribute to standardized evaluation of child behaviors during anesthesia induction and help improve the quality of perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"1458-1466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13639224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan.70290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many children undergoing anesthesia commonly exhibit distress behaviors such as anxiety, crying, and physical resistance. Assessment of this behavior is important as it could lead to postoperative behavioral changes and delayed recovery.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-observer reliability of the Turkish version of the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC), which was developed to assess compliance behaviors in children during anesthesia induction.

Methods: The study was planned as a prospective observational study. Following translation of the original ICC, content validity was examined using the Davis technique with the opinions of 10 experts. Next, Turkish ICC was applied simultaneously and independently by three independent observers during mask induction to 184 children (ASA I-III) aged 1-7 years undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Inter-observer reliability was evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss Kappa/Gwet's AC1; internal consistency with KR-20 and McDonald's omega; and construct validity with single-factor confirmatory factor analysis (WLSMV). Item analysis was performed with a tetrachoric correlation matrix, floor and ceiling effects.

Results: Content validity was excellent (I-CVI 0.90-1.00, S-CVI≈0.99). Inter-observer reliability for the total score was excellent: InCC (1, 2) = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94), InCC (2, 3) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). At the item level, Gwet's AC1 values ranged from 0.81 to 0.97, while Kappa values were generally 0.75-0.90 except for M11. Internal consistency was at an acceptable level with KR-20 0.49-0.52 and McDonald's omega 0.66-0.82. These results are low due to the floor effect caused by premedication. Confirmatory factor analysis moderately supported the single-factor structure (best fit in Observer Surgeon: CFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.907). High floor effect was prominent especially in rarely observed severe behaviors (M7-M11); strong correlation was observed between M9-M10 (0.89-0.94).

Conclusions: Following rigorous analysis, we found that the Turkish ICC is a reliable and valid tool that can assess children's compliance behaviors during pediatric anesthesia induction. Excellent inter-observer agreement and high content validity support its suitability for clinical and research use. The Turkish Induction Compliance Checklist is a reliable and valid measurement tool in the Turkish pediatric population. It can contribute to standardized evaluation of child behaviors during anesthesia induction and help improve the quality of perioperative care.

土耳其版儿童面罩麻醉诱导依从性检查表的心理测量学评价。
背景:许多接受麻醉的儿童通常表现出焦虑、哭泣和身体抵抗等痛苦行为。对这种行为的评估很重要,因为它可能导致术后行为改变和延迟恢复。目的:本研究的目的是评估土耳其版诱导依从性检查表(ICC)的内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性和观察者间信度,该检查表用于评估麻醉诱导过程中儿童的依从性行为。方法:本研究为前瞻性观察性研究。在翻译了原始ICC后,使用戴维斯技术和10位专家的意见对内容效度进行了检查。接下来,在184名接受麻醉和手术的1-7岁儿童(ASA I-III)的面罩诱导过程中,由三名独立观察员同时独立地应用土耳其ICC。采用类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)和Fleiss Kappa/Gwet’s AC1评价观察者间信度;内部与KR-20和麦当劳欧米茄的一致性;并采用单因素验证性因子分析(WLSMV)构建效度。项目分析采用四分频相关矩阵,地板和天花板效应。结果:内容效度极好(I-CVI 0.90 ~ 1.00, S-CVI≈0.99)。总体评分的观察者间信度非常好:InCC (1,2) = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94), InCC (2,3) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98)。在项目水平上,Gwet的AC1值在0.81 ~ 0.97之间,Kappa值除M11外普遍在0.75 ~ 0.90之间。内部一致性处于可接受的水平,其中KR-20为0.49-0.52,麦当劳为0.66-0.82。由于预用药引起的底效应,这些结果较低。验证性因素分析适度支持单因素结构(观察外科医生的最佳拟合:CFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.907)。高底效应在极少观测到的严重行为(M7-M11)中尤为突出;M9-M10之间存在较强的相关性(0.89-0.94)。结论:经过严格的分析,我们发现土耳其ICC是一种可靠有效的工具,可以评估儿童麻醉诱导期间的依从性行为。优秀的观察者间协议和高内容效度支持其适合临床和研究使用。土耳其诱导依从性检查表是一个可靠和有效的测量工具,在土耳其儿科人口。有助于对麻醉诱导过程中患儿行为的规范化评价,有助于提高围手术期护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书