Exercise Interventions for Adults With Chronic Conditions Living in Rural Areas-A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sam Beacroft, Riley C C Brown, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Nicola W Burton, Alexis Hure, Emily R Cox
{"title":"Exercise Interventions for Adults With Chronic Conditions Living in Rural Areas-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sam Beacroft, Riley C C Brown, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Nicola W Burton, Alexis Hure, Emily R Cox","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2026-0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is essential for chronic disease management, but intervention implementation in rural populations remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesize the characteristics and impact of exercise interventions delivered to adults living with chronic conditions in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Scopus, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to September 2025 for interventional studies evaluating exercise training interventions of ≥2 weeks among adults with chronic conditions living in rural areas across all countries. Data were extracted on study characteristics, exercise prescription, delivery methods, engagement strategies, and effectiveness outcomes related to physical activity and physical function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies (n = 2846 participants; 13 randomized controlled trials [RCT], 14 non-RCT) were included. The most common condition groups were musculoskeletal, cancer (acute or survivorship), respiratory, and metabolic/endocrine. Interventions were predominantly supervised and delivered in person (37%) or via telehealth (33%), most often by exercise professionals (37%). Combined aerobic and resistance (48%), aerobic only (22%), and resistance only (15%) training were commonly prescribed. Most studies prescribed 2 to 3 weekly sessions (57%), lasting 30 to 60 minutes (67%). Rural adaptations included telehealth delivery, upskilling nonexercise professionals, minimal or no equipment use, and delivery in existing healthcare settings. Evidence for intervention effectiveness was mixed; positive effects were observed for physical function outcomes (2 RCT and 5 non-RCT), while evidence for improvements in physical activity behavior (4 RCT and 1 non-RCT) and aerobic fitness (2 RCT and 6 non-RCT) were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions were generally supervised and incorporated rural adaptations. While physical function outcomes showed promising improvements, evidence for increasing physical activity and aerobic fitness remains inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2026-0313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise is essential for chronic disease management, but intervention implementation in rural populations remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesize the characteristics and impact of exercise interventions delivered to adults living with chronic conditions in rural areas.

Methods: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Scopus, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to September 2025 for interventional studies evaluating exercise training interventions of ≥2 weeks among adults with chronic conditions living in rural areas across all countries. Data were extracted on study characteristics, exercise prescription, delivery methods, engagement strategies, and effectiveness outcomes related to physical activity and physical function.

Results: Twenty-seven studies (n = 2846 participants; 13 randomized controlled trials [RCT], 14 non-RCT) were included. The most common condition groups were musculoskeletal, cancer (acute or survivorship), respiratory, and metabolic/endocrine. Interventions were predominantly supervised and delivered in person (37%) or via telehealth (33%), most often by exercise professionals (37%). Combined aerobic and resistance (48%), aerobic only (22%), and resistance only (15%) training were commonly prescribed. Most studies prescribed 2 to 3 weekly sessions (57%), lasting 30 to 60 minutes (67%). Rural adaptations included telehealth delivery, upskilling nonexercise professionals, minimal or no equipment use, and delivery in existing healthcare settings. Evidence for intervention effectiveness was mixed; positive effects were observed for physical function outcomes (2 RCT and 5 non-RCT), while evidence for improvements in physical activity behavior (4 RCT and 1 non-RCT) and aerobic fitness (2 RCT and 6 non-RCT) were inconsistent.

Conclusions: Interventions were generally supervised and incorporated rural adaptations. While physical function outcomes showed promising improvements, evidence for increasing physical activity and aerobic fitness remains inconclusive.

运动干预对生活在农村地区的成人慢性疾病的系统评价。
背景:运动对慢性疾病的管理至关重要,但在农村人群中的干预实施仍不清楚。本综述旨在综合运动干预对农村地区成人慢性病患者的特点和影响。方法:检索六个数据库(MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Scopus, CINAHL和SPORTDiscus),从成立到2025年9月,以评估所有国家农村地区慢性疾病成人≥2周运动训练干预的干预研究。提取研究特征、运动处方、递送方法、参与策略以及与身体活动和身体功能相关的有效性结果的数据。结果:纳入27项研究(n = 2846名受试者;13项随机对照试验[RCT], 14项非RCT)。最常见的疾病组是肌肉骨骼、癌症(急性或生存期)、呼吸和代谢/内分泌。干预措施主要是亲自监督和提供(37%)或通过远程医疗(33%),最常见的是由运动专业人员监督和提供(37%)。有氧和阻力联合训练(48%)、仅有氧(22%)和仅阻力(15%)是常用的训练方法。大多数研究规定每周2到3次(57%),持续30到60分钟(67%)。农村适应措施包括远程医疗服务,提高非运动专业人员的技能,尽量减少或不使用设备,以及在现有医疗保健环境中提供服务。干预有效性的证据好坏参半;在身体功能结果(2项随机对照试验和5项非随机对照试验)方面观察到积极的影响,而在身体活动行为(4项随机对照试验和1项非随机对照试验)和有氧健身(2项随机对照试验和6项非随机对照试验)方面的改善证据不一致。结论:干预措施普遍受到监督,并纳入农村适应措施。虽然身体机能的结果显示出有希望的改善,但增加身体活动和有氧健身的证据仍然没有定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书