Sexual Activity, Sexual Well-Being, and Associated Factors Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Aysu Yildiz Karaahmet, Shahla Shafaati Laleh
{"title":"Sexual Activity, Sexual Well-Being, and Associated Factors Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aysu Yildiz Karaahmet, Shahla Shafaati Laleh","doi":"10.1080/0092623X.2026.2716863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize quantitative evidence on sexuality-related outcomes, including sexual activity, behavior, function, and well-being, among older adults and to examine differences according to gender and social context. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review included quantitative observational studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the pooled estimates. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Older men had significantly higher sexual behavior-related scores than older women (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.14; <i>p</i> = 0.002), while older adults living with someone had higher sexual behavior-related scores than those living alone (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI 0.50-1.36; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was found in sexual function-related scores between sexually active and sexually passive older adults (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI -3.05 to 2.90; <i>p</i> = 0.96), although substantial heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation. Overall, sexuality-related outcomes in older adults appear to differ according to gender and social context, but the observed associations should be interpreted cautiously because of considerable between-study heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2026.2716863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize quantitative evidence on sexuality-related outcomes, including sexual activity, behavior, function, and well-being, among older adults and to examine differences according to gender and social context. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review included quantitative observational studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the pooled estimates. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Older men had significantly higher sexual behavior-related scores than older women (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.14; p = 0.002), while older adults living with someone had higher sexual behavior-related scores than those living alone (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI 0.50-1.36; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in sexual function-related scores between sexually active and sexually passive older adults (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI -3.05 to 2.90; p = 0.96), although substantial heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation. Overall, sexuality-related outcomes in older adults appear to differ according to gender and social context, but the observed associations should be interpreted cautiously because of considerable between-study heterogeneity.

老年人的性活动、性幸福感和相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是综合有关老年人性行为相关结果的定量证据,包括性活动、行为、功能和幸福感,并根据性别和社会背景检查差异。该综述按照PRISMA 2020指南进行,包括定量观察性研究。进行随机效应荟萃分析,使用I2统计量评估异质性,并进行留一敏感性分析评估汇总估计的稳健性。12项研究符合纳入标准。老年男性的性行为相关得分明显高于老年女性(SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.65至-0.14;p = 0.002),而与人同居的老年人的性行为相关得分高于独居的老年人(SMD = 0.93, 95% CI 0.50-1.36; p = 0.96),尽管大量异质性值得谨慎解释。总体而言,老年人的性行为相关结果似乎因性别和社会背景而异,但观察到的关联应谨慎解释,因为研究之间存在相当大的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy is one of the top independent journals in the field. Under the prestigious leadership of R. Taylor Seagraves, M.D. - one of the world" foremost experts in sex and marital therapy -- JSMT is an active and contemporary forum reflecting the most viable developments emanating from the U.S. and abroad. JSMT continues to break new ground with innovative research and clinical writing, and the editor is committed to showcasing the most far-reaching traditional and contemporary thinking from all sources. You will read about therapeutic techniques, outcome, special clinical and medical problems, and the theoretical parameters of sexual functioning, and marital relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书