Case Report: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Treatment Failure for Venous Thromboembolism in the Setting of Multiple Thrombophilic Conditions.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dominick Panzera, Evan Sasson
{"title":"Case Report: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Treatment Failure for Venous Thromboembolism in the Setting of Multiple Thrombophilic Conditions.","authors":"Dominick Panzera, Evan Sasson","doi":"10.1177/08971900261479657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes the treatment failure of two direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a patient with multiple thrombophilic conditions, including triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation. A 69-year-old male with a history of recurrent venous thromboembolism developed a deep vein thrombosis while receiving rivaroxaban, followed by an acute ischemic stroke while on dabigatran. Due to recurrent thrombosis despite therapeutic DOAC therapy, the patient was transitioned to warfarin with low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. After achieving a therapeutic INR, the patient remained stable without further thromboembolic or bleeding events during follow-up in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.Current guidelines, including the 2020 ISTH Scientific and Standardization Committee guidance, recommend vitamin K antagonists over DOACs in high-risk APS, particularly in patients with triple-positive antibodies, due to the increased risk of recurrent thrombosis with DOAC therapy. This recommendation is supported by the TRAPS trial, which demonstrated a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic events with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in triple-positive APS patients.This case supports existing guideline recommendations and highlights the limitations of targeted anticoagulation, including both factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors, in patients with complex thrombophilia. In patients with high-risk APS or multiple thrombophilic conditions, warfarin has been shown to be more reliable anticoagulation compared with DOACs. The sequential failure of two mechanistically distinct DOACs in this case further underscores the importance of guideline-concordant anticoagulant selection and the role of pharmacists in identifying high-risk patients at the point of prescribing and dispensing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900261479657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900261479657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case report describes the treatment failure of two direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a patient with multiple thrombophilic conditions, including triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation. A 69-year-old male with a history of recurrent venous thromboembolism developed a deep vein thrombosis while receiving rivaroxaban, followed by an acute ischemic stroke while on dabigatran. Due to recurrent thrombosis despite therapeutic DOAC therapy, the patient was transitioned to warfarin with low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. After achieving a therapeutic INR, the patient remained stable without further thromboembolic or bleeding events during follow-up in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.Current guidelines, including the 2020 ISTH Scientific and Standardization Committee guidance, recommend vitamin K antagonists over DOACs in high-risk APS, particularly in patients with triple-positive antibodies, due to the increased risk of recurrent thrombosis with DOAC therapy. This recommendation is supported by the TRAPS trial, which demonstrated a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic events with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in triple-positive APS patients.This case supports existing guideline recommendations and highlights the limitations of targeted anticoagulation, including both factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors, in patients with complex thrombophilia. In patients with high-risk APS or multiple thrombophilic conditions, warfarin has been shown to be more reliable anticoagulation compared with DOACs. The sequential failure of two mechanistically distinct DOACs in this case further underscores the importance of guideline-concordant anticoagulant selection and the role of pharmacists in identifying high-risk patients at the point of prescribing and dispensing.

病例报告:直接口服抗凝药物治疗静脉血栓栓塞在多重血栓性疾病的设置失败。
本病例报告描述了两种直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)治疗多种血栓性疾病患者的失败,包括三阳性抗磷脂综合征(APS)和杂合因子V Leiden突变。一名69岁男性,有静脉血栓栓塞复发史,在接受利伐沙班治疗期间发生深静脉血栓形成,随后在使用达比加群治疗期间发生急性缺血性中风。尽管进行了DOAC治疗,但由于血栓复发,患者改用华法林和低分子肝素桥接。在达到治疗性INR后,在药剂师管理的抗凝诊所随访期间,患者保持稳定,没有进一步的血栓栓塞或出血事件。目前的指南,包括2020年ISTH科学和标准化委员会指南,推荐在高风险APS中使用维生素K拮抗剂而不是DOAC,特别是在三阳性抗体患者中,因为DOAC治疗增加了复发性血栓形成的风险。这一建议得到了TRAPS试验的支持,该试验表明,在三阳性APS患者中,利伐沙班的血栓栓塞事件发生率明显高于华法林。该病例支持现有的指南建议,并强调了靶向抗凝治疗的局限性,包括Xa因子抑制剂和直接凝血酶抑制剂,用于复杂血栓患者。在高危APS或多发性血栓形成患者中,与DOACs相比,华法林具有更可靠的抗凝作用。在这种情况下,两个机制不同的doac的连续失败进一步强调了指南一致的抗凝剂选择的重要性,以及药剂师在处方和配药时识别高危患者的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书