A randomized trial evaluating pregabalin vs gabapentin on reducing opioid usage in patients with acute trauma injuries.

Q3 Medicine
Nancy M Duvall, Wesley Kafka, Chisom L Maduakonam, Nancy Payne, Damayanti Samanta
{"title":"A randomized trial evaluating pregabalin vs gabapentin on reducing opioid usage in patients with acute trauma injuries.","authors":"Nancy M Duvall, Wesley Kafka, Chisom L Maduakonam, Nancy Payne, Damayanti Samanta","doi":"10.5055/jom.0979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pregabalin and gabapentin have shown efficacy in reducing pain and opioid use, but limited data exist on their effectiveness in acute trauma patients. This study aimed to evaluate their impact on pain relief and opioid consumption in this population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, unblinded, randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a tertiary, academic Level I trauma center located in the southeastern region of the United States between 2021 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 101 patients were included in the study and randomized into three groups: pregabalin, gabapentin, and a control group.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The pregabalin group received 50 mg of pregabalin, the gabapentin group received 300 mg of gabapentin, and the control group received neither. Drugs were administered every 8 or 12 hours, based on patients' creatinine -clearance.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Patients' daily opioid intake during enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total opioid and nonopioid analgesic use was similar across all groups. Median total opioid use was 69.5 morphine milligram equivalent (MME), 81.0 MME, and 66.3 MME, and nonopioid use was 5,362.5 mg, 6,600.0 mg, and 7,225.0 mg in the pregabalin, gabapentin, and neither groups, respectively. Likewise, average daily use of both opioid and nonopioid analgesics was comparable across groups. Median average daily pain scores ranged from 6.2 to 6.4, with no significant differences observed among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal pain management in hospitalized trauma patients needs to be considered, especially in areas known for opioid misuse. Nonopioid analgesics aside from gabapentinoids may serve as an appropriate approach to manage pain in these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"22 3","pages":"241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pregabalin and gabapentin have shown efficacy in reducing pain and opioid use, but limited data exist on their effectiveness in acute trauma patients. This study aimed to evaluate their impact on pain relief and opioid consumption in this population.

Design: A prospective, unblinded, randomized trial.

Setting: This study was conducted at a tertiary, academic Level I trauma center located in the southeastern region of the United States between 2021 and 2024.

Patients: A total of 101 patients were included in the study and randomized into three groups: pregabalin, gabapentin, and a control group.

Interventions: The pregabalin group received 50 mg of pregabalin, the gabapentin group received 300 mg of gabapentin, and the control group received neither. Drugs were administered every 8 or 12 hours, based on patients' creatinine -clearance.

Main outcome measure: Patients' daily opioid intake during enrollment.

Results: Total opioid and nonopioid analgesic use was similar across all groups. Median total opioid use was 69.5 morphine milligram equivalent (MME), 81.0 MME, and 66.3 MME, and nonopioid use was 5,362.5 mg, 6,600.0 mg, and 7,225.0 mg in the pregabalin, gabapentin, and neither groups, respectively. Likewise, average daily use of both opioid and nonopioid analgesics was comparable across groups. Median average daily pain scores ranged from 6.2 to 6.4, with no significant differences observed among the groups.

Conclusions: Multimodal pain management in hospitalized trauma patients needs to be considered, especially in areas known for opioid misuse. Nonopioid analgesics aside from gabapentinoids may serve as an appropriate approach to manage pain in these individuals.

一项评估普瑞巴林与加巴喷丁在减少急性创伤损伤患者阿片类药物使用方面的随机试验。
目的:普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁已显示出减轻疼痛和阿片类药物使用的疗效,但关于其在急性创伤患者中的有效性的数据有限。本研究旨在评估它们对该人群疼痛缓解和阿片类药物消费的影响。设计:前瞻性、非盲法、随机试验。背景:本研究于2021年至2024年间在位于美国东南部地区的一个三级学术I级创伤中心进行。患者:研究共纳入101例患者,随机分为三组:普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁和对照组。干预措施:普瑞巴林组给予普瑞巴林50 mg,加巴喷丁组给予加巴喷丁300 mg,对照组均不给予。根据患者的肌酐清除率,每8或12小时给药一次。主要结局指标:入组期间患者每日阿片类药物摄入量。结果:阿片类药物和非阿片类药物的总使用在所有组中相似。在普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁和两组中,阿片类药物总使用量中位数分别为69.5、81.0和66.3吗啡毫克当量,非阿片类药物使用量分别为5362.5 mg、6600.0 mg和7225.0 mg。同样,各组间阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药的平均每日使用量也具有可比性。平均每日疼痛评分中位数从6.2到6.4不等,各组间无显著差异。结论:住院创伤患者的多模式疼痛管理需要考虑,特别是在已知的阿片类药物滥用地区。除了加巴喷丁类药物外,非阿片类镇痛药可能是治疗这些个体疼痛的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书