Short-to Medium-term Results of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Less than 50 Years of Age Undergoing Repair: Comparison of Open vs. Closed Reduction.
Cory Collinge, Henry Wong, Joseph Patterson, Andrea Finlay, Michael Gardner, George F Lebus, Saam Morshed, Andres Rodriguez-Buitrago, Michael J Beltran, Phillip Mitchell, Jack Will, John Ketz, Paul Tornetta
{"title":"Short-to Medium-term Results of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Less than 50 Years of Age Undergoing Repair: Comparison of Open vs. Closed Reduction.","authors":"Cory Collinge, Henry Wong, Joseph Patterson, Andrea Finlay, Michael Gardner, George F Lebus, Saam Morshed, Andres Rodriguez-Buitrago, Michael J Beltran, Phillip Mitchell, Jack Will, John Ketz, Paul Tornetta","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of open vs. closed reduction methods for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients treated with fracture repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-six North American Level 1 trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Skeletally mature patients aged <50 years with displaced FNFs (OTA/AO type 31B) undergoing surgical repair and having minimum follow-up >6 months, except in cases where major complications occurred earlier.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Open vs. closed fracture reduction.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>The primary outcome of \"major complication\" was defined as nonunion/failed fixation, osteonecrosis, malunion (vertical or femoral neck shortening of ≥15 mm) and/or subsequent major reconstructive surgery was compared by reduction method using chi-squared tests and risk-adjusted binary mixed effects regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 290 patients with FNFs were included in the study, 107 treated with closed reduction (average follow-up 27.1 months [range, 4.1 to 159.5 months]) and 183 treated with open reduction and (average follow-up 22.4 months [range, 3.7 to 141.3 months], P=0.105). Sex distribution showed no difference between the groups, with 25.5% of the closed group, and 29.0% of the open cohort being female (P=0.615). Patients who received open reduction were younger than patients who received closed reductions (mean age 35.6±8.8 vs. 39.5±8.0 years, P<0.001) and had fewer cases of cases of diabetes mellitus (2.2% vs. 8.6%, P=0.027). Overall, adverse events were observed following 57.0% of closed reduction reductions vs. 54.1% of open reductions (P=0.890). No differences were seen in the frequency of defined failure modes, including failed fixation/nonunion (33.6% closed vs. 35.0% open, P=0.919), osteonecrosis (21.5% closed vs. 14.2% open, P=0.151), malunion (17.8% closed vs. 14.8% open, P=0.611), or major reconstructive surgery (33.6% closed vs. 36.6% open, P=0.702).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open and closed reductions of FNFs in patients <50 years old were associated with similar rates of repair failure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of open vs. closed reduction methods for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients treated with fracture repair.
Setting: Twenty-six North American Level 1 trauma centers.
Patient selection criteria: Skeletally mature patients aged <50 years with displaced FNFs (OTA/AO type 31B) undergoing surgical repair and having minimum follow-up >6 months, except in cases where major complications occurred earlier.
Intervention: Open vs. closed fracture reduction.
Main outcome measurements: The primary outcome of "major complication" was defined as nonunion/failed fixation, osteonecrosis, malunion (vertical or femoral neck shortening of ≥15 mm) and/or subsequent major reconstructive surgery was compared by reduction method using chi-squared tests and risk-adjusted binary mixed effects regression models.
Results: A total of 290 patients with FNFs were included in the study, 107 treated with closed reduction (average follow-up 27.1 months [range, 4.1 to 159.5 months]) and 183 treated with open reduction and (average follow-up 22.4 months [range, 3.7 to 141.3 months], P=0.105). Sex distribution showed no difference between the groups, with 25.5% of the closed group, and 29.0% of the open cohort being female (P=0.615). Patients who received open reduction were younger than patients who received closed reductions (mean age 35.6±8.8 vs. 39.5±8.0 years, P<0.001) and had fewer cases of cases of diabetes mellitus (2.2% vs. 8.6%, P=0.027). Overall, adverse events were observed following 57.0% of closed reduction reductions vs. 54.1% of open reductions (P=0.890). No differences were seen in the frequency of defined failure modes, including failed fixation/nonunion (33.6% closed vs. 35.0% open, P=0.919), osteonecrosis (21.5% closed vs. 14.2% open, P=0.151), malunion (17.8% closed vs. 14.8% open, P=0.611), or major reconstructive surgery (33.6% closed vs. 36.6% open, P=0.702).
Conclusions: Open and closed reductions of FNFs in patients <50 years old were associated with similar rates of repair failure.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
