Frequency, Rationale, and Doses for Opioid Switching in Advanced Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aaron K Wong, Adarsh Das, Dorothy Wang, Brian Le, Jennifer Philip
{"title":"Frequency, Rationale, and Doses for Opioid Switching in Advanced Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Aaron K Wong, Adarsh Das, Dorothy Wang, Brian Le, Jennifer Philip","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2026.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is common in advanced cancer, and many people require opioid switching to achieve adequate analgesia. However, longitudinal patterns of switching across the complete illness trajectory remain poorly characterized. This study describes the incidence, indications, dose thresholds, and prescribing patterns of opioid switching from advanced cancer diagnosis to death.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed opioid prescribing data for 200 adults with advanced cancer from diagnosis to death. Prescribing data were converted to standardized oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD). Switching frequency, dose thresholds, duration of opioid use, documented indications, and prescriber patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Opioid switching occurred in 58% of patients (n = 116), with some requiring up to four switches. Each successive switch occurred after substantial dose escalation during treatment on a given opioid, where starting doses of each successive switch approximately doubled: 20 mg oMEDD for the first opioid, 30 mg at first switch, 60 mg at second, and 180 mg at third switch. Median duration on each opioid progressively shortened with each switch: 39 days interquartile range (IQR 9-98), 25 days (IQR 6-103), and 18 days (IQR 5-53) for the first, second, and third switches, respectively. Inadequate analgesia was the predominant indication (58% of switches). Palliative care clinicians initiated an increasing proportion of switches (31% of first opioids; 89% of third).</p><p><strong>Conclusion/lessions learned: </strong>Opioid switching is common across the advanced cancer trajectory, characterized by progressive dose escalation and shortening duration of use with each successive switch. These findings highlight the importance of access to multiple opioid options and timely specialist palliative care involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2026.08.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is common in advanced cancer, and many people require opioid switching to achieve adequate analgesia. However, longitudinal patterns of switching across the complete illness trajectory remain poorly characterized. This study describes the incidence, indications, dose thresholds, and prescribing patterns of opioid switching from advanced cancer diagnosis to death.

Measures: This retrospective cohort study analyzed opioid prescribing data for 200 adults with advanced cancer from diagnosis to death. Prescribing data were converted to standardized oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD). Switching frequency, dose thresholds, duration of opioid use, documented indications, and prescriber patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Outcomes: Opioid switching occurred in 58% of patients (n = 116), with some requiring up to four switches. Each successive switch occurred after substantial dose escalation during treatment on a given opioid, where starting doses of each successive switch approximately doubled: 20 mg oMEDD for the first opioid, 30 mg at first switch, 60 mg at second, and 180 mg at third switch. Median duration on each opioid progressively shortened with each switch: 39 days interquartile range (IQR 9-98), 25 days (IQR 6-103), and 18 days (IQR 5-53) for the first, second, and third switches, respectively. Inadequate analgesia was the predominant indication (58% of switches). Palliative care clinicians initiated an increasing proportion of switches (31% of first opioids; 89% of third).

Conclusion/lessions learned: Opioid switching is common across the advanced cancer trajectory, characterized by progressive dose escalation and shortening duration of use with each successive switch. These findings highlight the importance of access to multiple opioid options and timely specialist palliative care involvement.

晚期癌症阿片类药物转换的频率、原理和剂量:一项纵向队列研究。
背景:疼痛在晚期癌症中很常见,许多人需要阿片类药物转换来获得足够的镇痛。然而,在整个疾病轨迹上转换的纵向模式仍然缺乏特征。本研究描述了阿片类药物从晚期癌症诊断到死亡转换的发生率、适应症、剂量阈值和处方模式。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了200例晚期癌症患者从诊断到死亡的阿片类药物处方数据。处方数据转换为标准口服吗啡当量日剂量(oMEDD)。使用描述性统计分析切换频率、剂量阈值、阿片类药物使用持续时间、记录的适应症和处方模式。结果:58%的患者(n=116)发生了阿片类药物转换,有些患者需要多达四次转换。每次连续切换发生在给定阿片类药物治疗期间剂量大幅增加之后,每次连续切换的起始剂量大约翻倍:第一种阿片类药物20mg oMEDD,第一次切换30mg,第二次切换60mg,第三次切换180mg。每种阿片类药物的中位持续时间随着每次切换逐渐缩短:第一,第二和第三次切换分别为39天(IQR 9-98), 25天(IQR 6-103)和18天(IQR 5-53)。镇痛不足是主要适应症(58%的切换)。姑息治疗临床医生发起的转换比例越来越高(31%的第一阿片类药物;89%的第三)。结论:阿片类药物转换在晚期癌症患者中很常见,其特点是剂量逐渐增加,每次连续转换时使用时间缩短。这些发现强调了获得多种阿片类药物选择和及时的专家姑息治疗参与的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书