Chahyun Oh, Soomin Lee, Sujin Baek, Hyeyoung Choi, Man-Shik Shim, Sang-Jun Park, Yunseo Ku, Boohwi Hong, Yoon-Hee Kim
{"title":"Near-infrared spectroscopy for estimating mixed venous oxygen saturation and cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Chahyun Oh, Soomin Lee, Sujin Baek, Hyeyoung Choi, Man-Shik Shim, Sang-Jun Park, Yunseo Ku, Boohwi Hong, Yoon-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01477-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate whether jugular venous NIRS (rSjvO₂) and baseline-calibrated cerebral NIRS (cal-rScO₂) can serve as surrogates for mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂), and whether these inputs can support continuous cardiac output (CO) estimation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). In this prospective observational study, 25 adults undergoing elective OPCAB were enrolled at a single tertiary center. NIRS sensors were placed over the left internal jugular vein (IJV) under ultrasound guidance and over the bilateral forehead. Pulmonary artery catheter measurements served as the reference for SvO₂ and thermodilution CO (CO<sub>TD</sub>). Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis with linear mixed-effects modeling, and trending ability by error grid analysis. CO was estimated using a previously derived modified Fick equation. rSjvO₂ showed modest bias versus SvO₂ (2.0%) but wide limits of agreement (LoA, - 14.9 to 18.9%). Accuracy varied with jugular anatomy, with the lowest error at an IJV depth of 1.38 cm. Cal-rScO₂ showed better agreement (bias 0.8%; LoA, - 7.8 to 9.4%), excellent discrimination for SvO₂ <65% (AUC, 0.970), and good trending ability. In contrast, NIRS-based CO estimation showed significant proportional bias, 33.0% percentage error (95% CI, 27.4 to 41.5%), and poor trending ability. Cal-rScO₂ appears to be a useful surrogate for SvO₂ trending during OPCAB after simple one-point calibration. Jugular NIRS may be useful in selected patients, whereas NIRS-based CO estimation remained clinically insufficient.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0007918 November 18, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01477-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate whether jugular venous NIRS (rSjvO₂) and baseline-calibrated cerebral NIRS (cal-rScO₂) can serve as surrogates for mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂), and whether these inputs can support continuous cardiac output (CO) estimation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). In this prospective observational study, 25 adults undergoing elective OPCAB were enrolled at a single tertiary center. NIRS sensors were placed over the left internal jugular vein (IJV) under ultrasound guidance and over the bilateral forehead. Pulmonary artery catheter measurements served as the reference for SvO₂ and thermodilution CO (COTD). Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis with linear mixed-effects modeling, and trending ability by error grid analysis. CO was estimated using a previously derived modified Fick equation. rSjvO₂ showed modest bias versus SvO₂ (2.0%) but wide limits of agreement (LoA, - 14.9 to 18.9%). Accuracy varied with jugular anatomy, with the lowest error at an IJV depth of 1.38 cm. Cal-rScO₂ showed better agreement (bias 0.8%; LoA, - 7.8 to 9.4%), excellent discrimination for SvO₂ <65% (AUC, 0.970), and good trending ability. In contrast, NIRS-based CO estimation showed significant proportional bias, 33.0% percentage error (95% CI, 27.4 to 41.5%), and poor trending ability. Cal-rScO₂ appears to be a useful surrogate for SvO₂ trending during OPCAB after simple one-point calibration. Jugular NIRS may be useful in selected patients, whereas NIRS-based CO estimation remained clinically insufficient.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0007918 November 18, 2022).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.