Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Pathogenic Variants in Young-Onset Atrial Fibrillation

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2026-10-13 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1111/jce.70483
Nicholas D'Elia, Mariana Dragas, Frank Bevacqua, Dylan Jape, Kenneth Cho, Rose Crowley, Jeremy William, Romaniya Fernando, Sachin Iyer, Sandeep Prabhu, Stacey Peters, Mark Perrin, Tina Thompson, Hitesh Patel, Kunal Verma, Lucinda Salmon, Megan Cotter, Jonathan Kalman, Peter Kistler, Aleksandr Voskoboinik
{"title":"Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Pathogenic Variants in Young-Onset Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Nicholas D'Elia,&nbsp;Mariana Dragas,&nbsp;Frank Bevacqua,&nbsp;Dylan Jape,&nbsp;Kenneth Cho,&nbsp;Rose Crowley,&nbsp;Jeremy William,&nbsp;Romaniya Fernando,&nbsp;Sachin Iyer,&nbsp;Sandeep Prabhu,&nbsp;Stacey Peters,&nbsp;Mark Perrin,&nbsp;Tina Thompson,&nbsp;Hitesh Patel,&nbsp;Kunal Verma,&nbsp;Lucinda Salmon,&nbsp;Megan Cotter,&nbsp;Jonathan Kalman,&nbsp;Peter Kistler,&nbsp;Aleksandr Voskoboinik","doi":"10.1111/jce.70483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Young-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly recognized as a clinically distinct entity and heritable mechanisms may contribute to disease onset. Although pathogenic monogenic variants are increasingly identified in this population, their clinical phenotype and prognostic significance remain incompletely defined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to characterize the spectrum of genetic variants in patients with young-onset AF diagnosed at age 45 years or younger, identify clinical predictors of pathogenic variants, and evaluate their association with long-term clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicentre retrospective cohort study included adults with AF first diagnosed at age 45 years or younger who underwent clinical genetic testing across three tertiary centers in Melbourne, Australia. Variants were re-assessed using contemporary American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology criteria and classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) or negative/variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Baseline clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, cardiac imaging, and long-term outcomes were compared between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 58 patients who underwent genetic testing, 30 (52%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic monogenic variant. The most frequent variants involved <i>TTN</i> (<i>n</i> = 8, 13.8%) and <i>LMNA</i> (<i>n</i> = 6, 10.3%), followed by <i>MYBPC3</i> and <i>MYH7</i> (each <i>n</i> = 3, 5.2%). Family history of AF or cardiomyopathy was more common in the P/LP than the negative/VUS group (76.7% vs. 46.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.030) and was independently associated with a pathogenic variant (OR 3.90; 95% CI 1.28–13.0; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Patients with pathogenic variants more frequently had first-degree atrioventricular block (20.0% vs. 0.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.024). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was more frequent in P/LP patients (53.6% vs. 25.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.05), whereas mortality, stroke, post-ablation AF recurrence, and pacemaker implantation were similar.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this highly selected young-onset AF cohort referred for genetic testing, pathogenic monogenic variants were common. There was a significant proportion of patients suffering adverse long-term events.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"37 10","pages":"2280-2288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.70483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Young-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly recognized as a clinically distinct entity and heritable mechanisms may contribute to disease onset. Although pathogenic monogenic variants are increasingly identified in this population, their clinical phenotype and prognostic significance remain incompletely defined.

Aims

We sought to characterize the spectrum of genetic variants in patients with young-onset AF diagnosed at age 45 years or younger, identify clinical predictors of pathogenic variants, and evaluate their association with long-term clinical outcomes.

Methods

This multicentre retrospective cohort study included adults with AF first diagnosed at age 45 years or younger who underwent clinical genetic testing across three tertiary centers in Melbourne, Australia. Variants were re-assessed using contemporary American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology criteria and classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) or negative/variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Baseline clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, cardiac imaging, and long-term outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

Among 58 patients who underwent genetic testing, 30 (52%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic monogenic variant. The most frequent variants involved TTN (n = 8, 13.8%) and LMNA (n = 6, 10.3%), followed by MYBPC3 and MYH7 (each n = 3, 5.2%). Family history of AF or cardiomyopathy was more common in the P/LP than the negative/VUS group (76.7% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.030) and was independently associated with a pathogenic variant (OR 3.90; 95% CI 1.28–13.0; p = 0.020). Patients with pathogenic variants more frequently had first-degree atrioventricular block (20.0% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.024). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was more frequent in P/LP patients (53.6% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.05), whereas mortality, stroke, post-ablation AF recurrence, and pacemaker implantation were similar.

Conclusions

In this highly selected young-onset AF cohort referred for genetic testing, pathogenic monogenic variants were common. There was a significant proportion of patients suffering adverse long-term events.

年轻起病心房颤动致病变异的临床表现和预后。
简介:早发性心房颤动(AF)越来越被认为是一种临床独特的实体,遗传机制可能有助于疾病的发病。尽管致病性单基因变异在这一人群中越来越多地被发现,但其临床表型和预后意义仍然不完全明确。目的:我们试图描述45岁或以下诊断为年轻发病的房颤患者的遗传变异谱,确定致病变异的临床预测因素,并评估其与长期临床结果的关系。方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究包括首次诊断为房颤的年龄在45岁或以下的成年人,他们在澳大利亚墨尔本的三个三级中心接受了临床基因检测。使用当代美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院/分子病理学协会标准重新评估变异,并将其分类为致病/可能致病(P/LP)或阴性/不确定意义变异(VUS)。比较两组患者的基线临床特征、心电图表现、心脏影像学和长期预后。结果:在58例接受基因检测的患者中,30例(52%)有致病性或可能致病性单基因变异。最常见的变异包括TTN (n = 8, 13.8%)和LMNA (n = 6, 10.3%),其次是MYBPC3和MYH7(各n = 3, 5.2%)。房颤或心肌病家族史在P/LP组比阴性/VUS组更常见(76.7% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.030),且与致病变异独立相关(or 3.90; 95% CI 1.28-13.0; P = 0.020)。致病变异的患者更常发生一级房室传导阻滞(20.0% vs 0.0%; p = 0.024)。植入式心律转复除颤器植入在P/LP患者中更为常见(53.6%比25.0%,P = 0.05),而死亡率、卒中、消融后房颤复发和起搏器植入相似。结论:在这个高度选择性的年轻发病房颤队列中,进行基因检测,致病性单基因变异是常见的。有相当比例的患者出现不良的长期事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书