Effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) original vaccines to prevent COVID-19-related hospitalisations among Alaska Native peoples, January 2021-October 2022.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ian Blake, Rosalyn Singleton, Dana Bruden, Jacob Gray, Marc Fischer, James Keck
{"title":"Effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) original vaccines to prevent COVID-19-related hospitalisations among Alaska Native peoples, January 2021-October 2022.","authors":"Ian Blake, Rosalyn Singleton, Dana Bruden, Jacob Gray, Marc Fischer, James Keck","doi":"10.1080/22423982.2026.2706888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples experienced some of the highest rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease in the United States. However, there are limited data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in this population. We performed a test-negative case‒control study using electronic health record data to evaluate the effectiveness of the original three FDA-authorised vaccines to prevent COVID-19-associated hospitalisations among AI/AN adults during 2021-2022. COVID-19 vaccines were effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and death in this population. However, vaccine effectiveness waned over time and during the post-Omicron variant time period. Booster vaccination proved effective during a period when the Omicron variant was circulating. Waning effectiveness with time and the introduction of new variants supports the need to stay up-to-date with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Evaluating vaccine effectiveness using electronic health records proved to be a useful tool during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","volume":"85 1","pages":"2706888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13501746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2026.2706888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples experienced some of the highest rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease in the United States. However, there are limited data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in this population. We performed a test-negative case‒control study using electronic health record data to evaluate the effectiveness of the original three FDA-authorised vaccines to prevent COVID-19-associated hospitalisations among AI/AN adults during 2021-2022. COVID-19 vaccines were effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and death in this population. However, vaccine effectiveness waned over time and during the post-Omicron variant time period. Booster vaccination proved effective during a period when the Omicron variant was circulating. Waning effectiveness with time and the introduction of new variants supports the need to stay up-to-date with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Evaluating vaccine effectiveness using electronic health records proved to be a useful tool during a pandemic.

2021年1月至2022年10月,预防阿拉斯加原住民因COVID-19相关疾病住院的原疫苗有效性
美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)在美国经历了2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疾病的最高发病率。然而,关于COVID-19疫苗在这一人群中的有效性的数据有限。我们使用电子健康记录数据进行了一项检测阴性病例对照研究,以评估fda最初批准的三种疫苗在2021-2022年期间预防AI/AN成人与covid -19相关住院的有效性。COVID-19疫苗在预防该人群与COVID-19相关的住院、重症监护病房入住、机械通气和死亡方面是有效的。然而,疫苗的有效性随着时间的推移而减弱,并在欧米克隆变异后的时间段内减弱。在欧米克隆变异流行期间,加强疫苗接种被证明是有效的。随着时间的推移,效力逐渐减弱,新变种的出现,这支持了保持最新的SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的必要性。事实证明,在大流行期间,利用电子健康记录评估疫苗有效性是一种有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Circumpolar Health
International Journal of Circumpolar Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Circumpolar Health is published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Circumpolar Health Research Network [CircHNet]. The journal follows the tradition initiated by its predecessor, Arctic Medical Research. The journal specializes in circumpolar health. It provides a forum for many disciplines, including the biomedical sciences, social sciences, and humanities as they relate to human health in high latitude environments. The journal has a particular interest in the health of indigenous peoples. It is a vehicle for dissemination and exchange of knowledge among researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and those they serve. International Journal of Circumpolar Health welcomes Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications, Book Reviews, Dissertation Summaries, History and Biography, Clinical Case Reports, Public Health Practice, Conference and Workshop Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书