Saudi expert consensus on the management of acute asthma and COPD exacerbations with algorithm of aerosol drug delivery device recommendations.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Zohair Al Aseri, Mohammed Zeitouni, Majdy Idrees, Imad Khojah, Waleed Al Sowayan, Badr Aldawood, Khaled Alawam, Thiagarajan Jaiganesh
{"title":"Saudi expert consensus on the management of acute asthma and COPD exacerbations with algorithm of aerosol drug delivery device recommendations.","authors":"Zohair Al Aseri, Mohammed Zeitouni, Majdy Idrees, Imad Khojah, Waleed Al Sowayan, Badr Aldawood, Khaled Alawam, Thiagarajan Jaiganesh","doi":"10.1186/s12245-026-01350-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a practical, expert consensus for the management of acute asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations in Saudi Arabia's Emergency Departments (EDs), addressing gaps in triage, diagnostic certainty, and aerosol delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified expert consensus process with Delphi elements was employed. Eight multidisciplinary experts in pulmonary medicine, emergency medicine, and respiratory therapy, three of whom were affiliated with the Saudi Society of Emergency Medicine (SASEM), two of whom are authors of the Saudi initiative for Asthma (SINA) Guidelines, and three of whom are authors of the Saudi COPD guidelines, reviewed evidence-based presentations and formulated structured discussion questions before the meeting. The advisory board session (Riyadh, November 19, 2025) served as the formal consensus round, addressing ten predefined clinical questions across two moderated debate sessions, with formal voting on two key device-selection statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel adopted a dual-phase severity classification: a binary \"Non-Severe vs. Severe\" model for rapid ED triage, followed by the four-tier SINA classification for clinical management. Pharmacological algorithms were standardized, prioritizing early corticosteroid therapy and optimizing bronchodilator dosing to mitigate toxicity. The panel reached a unanimous consensus that aerosol delivery device selection significantly influences treatment success; A-VMN was recommended at escalating strengths across severity levels (Class IIb-I) and as a preferred option for severe and ventilated patients, based on superior lung deposition, infection control advantages, and improved discharge rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This modified expert consensus aims to provide an up-to-date, organized, and action-oriented protocol for Saudi EDs. It advocates a stratified triage system and evidence-based selection of aerosol-delivery devices to improve patient outcomes, enhance safety, and optimize resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13491584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01350-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a practical, expert consensus for the management of acute asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations in Saudi Arabia's Emergency Departments (EDs), addressing gaps in triage, diagnostic certainty, and aerosol delivery.

Methods: A modified expert consensus process with Delphi elements was employed. Eight multidisciplinary experts in pulmonary medicine, emergency medicine, and respiratory therapy, three of whom were affiliated with the Saudi Society of Emergency Medicine (SASEM), two of whom are authors of the Saudi initiative for Asthma (SINA) Guidelines, and three of whom are authors of the Saudi COPD guidelines, reviewed evidence-based presentations and formulated structured discussion questions before the meeting. The advisory board session (Riyadh, November 19, 2025) served as the formal consensus round, addressing ten predefined clinical questions across two moderated debate sessions, with formal voting on two key device-selection statements.

Results: The panel adopted a dual-phase severity classification: a binary "Non-Severe vs. Severe" model for rapid ED triage, followed by the four-tier SINA classification for clinical management. Pharmacological algorithms were standardized, prioritizing early corticosteroid therapy and optimizing bronchodilator dosing to mitigate toxicity. The panel reached a unanimous consensus that aerosol delivery device selection significantly influences treatment success; A-VMN was recommended at escalating strengths across severity levels (Class IIb-I) and as a preferred option for severe and ventilated patients, based on superior lung deposition, infection control advantages, and improved discharge rates.

Conclusion: This modified expert consensus aims to provide an up-to-date, organized, and action-oriented protocol for Saudi EDs. It advocates a stratified triage system and evidence-based selection of aerosol-delivery devices to improve patient outcomes, enhance safety, and optimize resource utilization.

沙特专家共识管理急性哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病加重与算法的气溶胶给药装置的建议。
目的:为沙特阿拉伯急诊科(EDs)急性哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)恶化的管理制定实用的专家共识,解决分诊、诊断确定性和气溶胶输送方面的差距。方法:采用改进的德尔菲元素专家共识法。8位肺医学、急诊医学和呼吸治疗的多学科专家,其中3位隶属于沙特急诊医学学会(SASEM), 2位是沙特哮喘倡议(SINA)指南的作者,3位是沙特COPD指南的作者,他们在会议前审查了循证报告并制定了结构化的讨论问题。咨询委员会会议(2025年11月19日,利雅得)作为正式的共识轮,在两个主持的辩论会议中解决了十个预先确定的临床问题,并对两个关键设备选择声明进行了正式投票。结果:该小组采用了两阶段的严重程度分级:用于快速ED分诊的二元“非严重与严重”模型,其次是用于临床管理的四级SINA分级。药理学算法标准化,优先考虑早期皮质类固醇治疗,优化支气管扩张剂剂量以减轻毒性。专家组达成一致意见,气溶胶输送装置的选择显著影响治疗成功;基于优越的肺沉积、感染控制优势和提高的出院率,建议a - vmn在不同严重程度(IIb-I级)的强度不断增加,并作为重症和通气患者的首选。结论:这一修改后的专家共识旨在为沙特急诊科提供一个最新的、有组织的、以行动为导向的方案。它提倡分层分诊系统和基于证据的气溶胶输送装置选择,以改善患者预后,提高安全性,优化资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书