Apixaban Lead-In Versus Lead-In Omission in Hospitalized Adults with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Safety Analysis.

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kelly Rice, Abigail Hoff, Molly Droege, Timothy Rice, Christopher A Droege, Paige Bradshaw, Lindsey Federle, Savannah Ruess, Carolyn D Philpott
{"title":"Apixaban Lead-In Versus Lead-In Omission in Hospitalized Adults with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Safety Analysis.","authors":"Kelly Rice, Abigail Hoff, Molly Droege, Timothy Rice, Christopher A Droege, Paige Bradshaw, Lindsey Federle, Savannah Ruess, Carolyn D Philpott","doi":"10.1177/00185787261476068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apixaban for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is dosed with an intensified 7-day lead-in to decrease recurrence. The optimal initiation dosing in hospitalized patients remains unknown. This study compares the safety and efficacy of apixaban maintenance versus lead-in dose initiation in hospitalized patients with acute VTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This IRB-approved, retrospective, single center, cohort study was conducted at a quaternary referral, academic medical center. Adult patients diagnosed with acute VTE who received ≥1 apixaban dose during hospitalization were eligible for inclusion. Patients initiated on apixaban ≥7 days from VTE or anticoagulated within 3 months prior to admission were excluded. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: (1) maintenance dose (MD) - no apixaban 10 mg dose and (2) lead-in dose (LD) - received ≥1 apixaban 10 mg dose. Outcomes were assessed for 3 months following apixaban initiation. The primary outcome compared a composite endpoint of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding (NMCRB) between groups. The secondary outcome compared a composite endpoint of recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality (VTE-M) between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 (28 MD, 172 LD) patients were included. Patients were 61 (48-72) years old and admitted 5 (2-12) days. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Parenteral anticoagulation was administered in 90% (25 [89%] MD, 156 [91%] LD) of patients prior to apixaban initiation. Time on parenteral anticoagulation was longer in MD (61 [37-88] hours] compared to LD (40 [18-65] hours) patients (<i>P</i> = .02). Composite major and NMCRB occurred in 6 (21.4%) MD and 21 (12.2%) LD patients (<i>P</i> = .19). Composite VTE-M occurred in 2 (7.1%) MD and 16 (9.3%) LD patients (<i>P</i> = .71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no difference in bleeding or VTE-M in hospitalized patients with acute VTE receiving apixaban MD versus LD. The high incidence of bleeding suggests caution is needed with apixaban initiation in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787261476068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13481519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787261476068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Apixaban for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is dosed with an intensified 7-day lead-in to decrease recurrence. The optimal initiation dosing in hospitalized patients remains unknown. This study compares the safety and efficacy of apixaban maintenance versus lead-in dose initiation in hospitalized patients with acute VTE.

Methods: This IRB-approved, retrospective, single center, cohort study was conducted at a quaternary referral, academic medical center. Adult patients diagnosed with acute VTE who received ≥1 apixaban dose during hospitalization were eligible for inclusion. Patients initiated on apixaban ≥7 days from VTE or anticoagulated within 3 months prior to admission were excluded. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: (1) maintenance dose (MD) - no apixaban 10 mg dose and (2) lead-in dose (LD) - received ≥1 apixaban 10 mg dose. Outcomes were assessed for 3 months following apixaban initiation. The primary outcome compared a composite endpoint of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding (NMCRB) between groups. The secondary outcome compared a composite endpoint of recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality (VTE-M) between groups.

Results: A total of 200 (28 MD, 172 LD) patients were included. Patients were 61 (48-72) years old and admitted 5 (2-12) days. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Parenteral anticoagulation was administered in 90% (25 [89%] MD, 156 [91%] LD) of patients prior to apixaban initiation. Time on parenteral anticoagulation was longer in MD (61 [37-88] hours] compared to LD (40 [18-65] hours) patients (P = .02). Composite major and NMCRB occurred in 6 (21.4%) MD and 21 (12.2%) LD patients (P = .19). Composite VTE-M occurred in 2 (7.1%) MD and 16 (9.3%) LD patients (P = .71).

Conclusion: This study found no difference in bleeding or VTE-M in hospitalized patients with acute VTE receiving apixaban MD versus LD. The high incidence of bleeding suggests caution is needed with apixaban initiation in this population.

住院成人急性静脉血栓栓塞患者引入阿哌沙班与不引入阿哌沙班:回顾性安全性分析
背景:阿哌沙班治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的7天用药时间加强,以减少复发。住院患者的最佳起始剂量仍然未知。本研究比较了急性静脉血栓栓塞住院患者阿哌沙班维持与引入剂量起始的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究经irb批准,在一家四级转诊学术医疗中心进行回顾性、单中心、队列研究。诊断为急性静脉血栓栓塞且住院期间接受阿哌沙班剂量≥1的成年患者符合纳入条件。排除静脉血栓栓塞后≥7天开始阿哌沙班治疗或入院前3个月内抗凝治疗的患者。患者分为2组:(1)维持剂量组(MD) -无阿哌沙班10mg剂量;(2)引入剂量组(LD) -接受≥1阿哌沙班10mg剂量。在阿哌沙班启动后3个月评估结果。主要终点比较了两组间主要和非主要临床相关出血(NMCRB)的复合终点。次要终点比较了两组间复发性静脉血栓栓塞和全因死亡率(VTE- m)的复合终点。结果:共纳入200例(MD 28例,LD 172例)。患者年龄61(48 ~ 72)岁,入院5(2 ~ 12)天。各组间基线特征相似。在阿哌沙班开始治疗前,90% (25 [89%]MD, 156 [91%] LD)的患者接受了肠外抗凝治疗。MD患者的肠外抗凝时间(61[37-88]小时)比LD患者(40[18-65]小时)更长(P = 0.02)。MD患者6例(21.4%),LD患者21例(12.2%)发生复合major和NMCRB (P = 0.19)。复合VTE-M发生在2例MD(7.1%)和16例LD (9.3%) (P = 0.71)。结论:本研究发现,急性静脉血栓栓塞住院患者接受阿哌沙班MD治疗与接受LD治疗在出血或VTE- m方面没有差异。出血的高发生率表明,在这一人群中,需要谨慎使用阿哌沙班。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书