Geographic variation in certified headache subspecialty availability in the United States.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1111/head.70197
Bradley Ong, Nicolas Thompson, Heidi Mueller, Amaal J Starling, Nan Cheng
{"title":"Geographic variation in certified headache subspecialty availability in the United States.","authors":"Bradley Ong, Nicolas Thompson, Heidi Mueller, Amaal J Starling, Nan Cheng","doi":"10.1111/head.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Our objectives were to characterize the geographic distribution and local availability of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists across US counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and to examine associations with socioeconomic deprivation, social vulnerability, and urbanicity. Headache disorders are highly prevalent and disabling, yet local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in the United States remains uneven. Although prior studies have described national and state-level distributions of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, important gaps remain in understanding county-level availability and disparities in access. Prior state-level summaries may mask within-state differences in access to United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial workforce analysis of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists in the United States as of January 7, 2026. Practice locations were mapped to counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and compared with general neurologist supply from the National Provider Identifier registry. Estimated population need was calculated by applying a national migraine prevalence to adult population denominators. We examined associations between specialist distribution and county-level socioeconomic vulnerability, urbanicity, and region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3144 US counties, 2870 (91.3%) had no United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, and 2085 (66.3%) had no neurologists. Headache specialists were entirely absent from counties without neurologists. Median county-level headache specialist density was 0 per 100,000 adults, reflecting the absence of local subspecialty care in most US counties. Accounting for county adult population, neurologist density, urbanicity, and region, higher Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with lower headache specialist rates. Each 10-point increase in Area Deprivation Index was associated with lower expected headache specialist rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-0.93), and each 0.1-unit increase in Social Vulnerability Index was also associated with lower expected rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.90-0.98). Headache specialist availability relative to estimated population need varied markedly across counties, with substantial estimated local differences between migraine burden and certified subspecialty supply that were not apparent in state-level summaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists are unevenly distributed across the United States, with limited local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and nonmetropolitan counties. County-level analyses identified substantial local gaps in certified headache subspecialty availability that were not apparent in state-level summaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"2006-2019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives/background: Our objectives were to characterize the geographic distribution and local availability of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists across US counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and to examine associations with socioeconomic deprivation, social vulnerability, and urbanicity. Headache disorders are highly prevalent and disabling, yet local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in the United States remains uneven. Although prior studies have described national and state-level distributions of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, important gaps remain in understanding county-level availability and disparities in access. Prior state-level summaries may mask within-state differences in access to United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial workforce analysis of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists in the United States as of January 7, 2026. Practice locations were mapped to counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and compared with general neurologist supply from the National Provider Identifier registry. Estimated population need was calculated by applying a national migraine prevalence to adult population denominators. We examined associations between specialist distribution and county-level socioeconomic vulnerability, urbanicity, and region.

Results: Among 3144 US counties, 2870 (91.3%) had no United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, and 2085 (66.3%) had no neurologists. Headache specialists were entirely absent from counties without neurologists. Median county-level headache specialist density was 0 per 100,000 adults, reflecting the absence of local subspecialty care in most US counties. Accounting for county adult population, neurologist density, urbanicity, and region, higher Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with lower headache specialist rates. Each 10-point increase in Area Deprivation Index was associated with lower expected headache specialist rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-0.93), and each 0.1-unit increase in Social Vulnerability Index was also associated with lower expected rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.90-0.98). Headache specialist availability relative to estimated population need varied markedly across counties, with substantial estimated local differences between migraine burden and certified subspecialty supply that were not apparent in state-level summaries.

Conclusion: United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists are unevenly distributed across the United States, with limited local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and nonmetropolitan counties. County-level analyses identified substantial local gaps in certified headache subspecialty availability that were not apparent in state-level summaries.

美国经认证的头痛亚专科可用性的地理差异。
目的/背景:我们的目的是表征美国各县、医院转诊地区和州的美国神经病学亚专科委员会认证的头痛专家的地理分布和当地可获得性,并研究与社会经济剥夺、社会脆弱性和城市化的关系。头痛疾病是非常普遍和致残的,但在美国,当地认证的头痛亚专科护理的可用性仍然不平衡。尽管先前的研究描述了美国神经病学亚专科委员会认证的头痛专家在全国和州一级的分布情况,但在了解县级可获得性和可获得性的差异方面仍然存在重要差距。先前的州级总结可能会掩盖在获得美国神经病学亚专科委员会认证的头痛专家方面的州内差异。方法:截至2026年1月7日,我们对美国神经病学亚专科委员会认证的头痛专家进行了横断面地理空间劳动力分析。实践地点被映射到县、医院转诊地区和州,并与来自国家提供者标识注册的普通神经科医生供应进行比较。估计的人口需求是通过将国家偏头痛患病率应用于成人人口分母来计算的。我们研究了专家分布与县级社会经济脆弱性、城市化和区域之间的关系。结果:在美国3144个县中,2870个县(91.3%)没有美国神经病学分会认证的头痛专家,2085个县(66.3%)没有神经科医生。在没有神经科医生的县,头痛专家完全缺席。县级头痛专家密度中位数为0 / 10万成年人,反映了美国大多数县缺乏当地亚专科护理。考虑到县成人人口、神经科医生密度、城市化程度和地区,较高的地区剥夺指数和社会脆弱性指数得分与较低的头痛专科发病率相关。区域剥夺指数每增加10个点,预期头痛专科率就会降低(调整发生率比= 0.87,95%可信区间= 0.82-0.93);社会脆弱性指数每增加0.1个单位,预期头痛专科率也会降低(调整发生率比= 0.94,95%可信区间= 0.90-0.98)。相对于估计的人口需求,头痛专家的可用性在各个县之间存在显著差异,偏头痛负担和经认证的亚专科供应之间存在实质性的地方差异,这在州级总结中并不明显。结论:美国神经系统亚专科委员会认证的头痛专科医生在美国分布不均,在社会经济条件差和非大都市县,当地获得认证的头痛亚专科护理的机会有限。县级分析确定了在认证的头痛亚专科可获得性方面存在巨大的地方差距,而这在州级总结中并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书